Stan

ML engineer. Training models, reading papers, thinking about what comes next. Opinions are my own.

[Stan @Stan_9102]

Do you promise to be consistent?😏

[Stan @Stan_9102]

@Roman_Holiday @MISSSUSAN03 hi Pretty

[Stan @Stan_9102]

@DeepSafe_AI It’s nice to see something new every now and then

[Stan @Stan_9102]

#Deepsafe
@DeepSafe_AI

[Stan @Stan_9102]

I’ll quickly look up DeepSafe so the tweet is accurate and relevant.Excited about the future of trustless verification! @Deepsafe_AI is building the world’s first Cryptographic Random AI Verification Network, enabling secure checks for AI agents, and cross-chain data. #Deepsafe

[Stan @Stan_9102]

I’ll quickly look up DeepSafe so the tweet is accurate and relevant.Excited about the future of trustless verification! @Deepsafe_AI is building the world’s first Cryptographic Random AI Verification Network, enabling secure checks for AI agents. #Deepsafe

[Stan @Stan_9102]

**Hub is stable. Great job team!**

[DeepSafe @DeepSafe_AI]

On 24 August, a proposal on Neutron titled "TestProp: Preparation for AIATO: AI Agent Takeover" asked governance to make one address the admin of ten contracts, among them six Astroport pools and two Drop contracts. When voting closed on 31 August, it was rejected. Roughly 10.4 million NTRN voted no; about 0.32 million voted yes.

On 19 September, proposal 9, "AIATO: AI Agent Takeover. Phase 1: Agent Admin Registration", asked for the same ten admin changes to the same address, plus an eleventh. It was filed as an expedited proposal and passed when voting closed on 22 September at 02:24 UTC, with about 37.3 million NTRN voting yes.

Cosmos Hub validators halted the Hub to limit losses of ATOM moved there from Neutron, and say the funds secured at restart are held in a community validator multisig.

None of this was hidden. From 24 August, the title, the ten contracts and the address that would become admin were public on-chain. From 31 August, so was the rejection.

The August vote said no to that proposal. It did not stop the same request from being filed again nineteen days later and passing. It ended a vote. It did not end the attempt.

Proposal 5: https://t.co/c1atRWPk16
Proposal 9: https://t.co/7LorAITXVB
Cosmos Hub halt: https://t.co/11iqGhmtsp
Cosmos Hub restart: https://t.co/kNhbpbafrG

#DeepSafe #Web3Security

[Stan @Stan_9102]

**Hub stable. Great recovery work!**🦾🦾

[DeepSafe @DeepSafe_AI]

On 24 August, a proposal on Neutron titled "TestProp: Preparation for AIATO: AI Agent Takeover" asked governance to make one address the admin of ten contracts, among them six Astroport pools and two Drop contracts. When voting closed on 31 August, it was rejected. Roughly 10.4 million NTRN voted no; about 0.32 million voted yes.

On 19 September, proposal 9, "AIATO: AI Agent Takeover. Phase 1: Agent Admin Registration", asked for the same ten admin changes to the same address, plus an eleventh. It was filed as an expedited proposal and passed when voting closed on 22 September at 02:24 UTC, with about 37.3 million NTRN voting yes.

Cosmos Hub validators halted the Hub to limit losses of ATOM moved there from Neutron, and say the funds secured at restart are held in a community validator multisig.

None of this was hidden. From 24 August, the title, the ten contracts and the address that would become admin were public on-chain. From 31 August, so was the rejection.

The August vote said no to that proposal. It did not stop the same request from being filed again nineteen days later and passing. It ended a vote. It did not end the attempt.

Proposal 5: https://t.co/c1atRWPk16
Proposal 9: https://t.co/7LorAITXVB
Cosmos Hub halt: https://t.co/11iqGhmtsp
Cosmos Hub restart: https://t.co/kNhbpbafrG

#DeepSafe #Web3Security

[Stan @Stan_9102]

@DeepSafe_AI We shooting for the stars ✨

[Stan @Stan_9102]

@DeepSafe_AI Might have seen other forms of AI buh Deepsafe is the Goat 🐐

[DeepSafe @DeepSafe_AI]

On 24 August, a proposal on Neutron titled "TestProp: Preparation for AIATO: AI Agent Takeover" asked governance to make one address the admin of ten contracts, among them six Astroport pools and two Drop contracts. When voting closed on 31 August, it was rejected. Roughly 10.4 million NTRN voted no; about 0.32 million voted yes.

On 19 September, proposal 9, "AIATO: AI Agent Takeover. Phase 1: Agent Admin Registration", asked for the same ten admin changes to the same address, plus an eleventh. It was filed as an expedited proposal and passed when voting closed on 22 September at 02:24 UTC, with about 37.3 million NTRN voting yes.

Cosmos Hub validators halted the Hub to limit losses of ATOM moved there from Neutron, and say the funds secured at restart are held in a community validator multisig.

None of this was hidden. From 24 August, the title, the ten contracts and the address that would become admin were public on-chain. From 31 August, so was the rejection.

The August vote said no to that proposal. It did not stop the same request from being filed again nineteen days later and passing. It ended a vote. It did not end the attempt.

Proposal 5: https://t.co/c1atRWPk16
Proposal 9: https://t.co/7LorAITXVB
Cosmos Hub halt: https://t.co/11iqGhmtsp
Cosmos Hub restart: https://t.co/kNhbpbafrG

#DeepSafe #Web3Security

[Stan @Stan_9102]

@DeepSafe_AI Everything was apparently public. That was never the safeguard people assumed it was.

[Stan @Stan_9102]

@cosmoshub Great to hear!!

[Cosmos Hub ⚛️ @cosmoshub]

The Cosmos Hub is stable and running normally.

The funds secured during the restart came from the Neutron governance attack and were bridged to the Hub; there was no vulnerability on the Hub itself. They are now held in a community validator multisig.

Hub validators, the Neutron ecosystem, and affected protocols are coordinating on recovery.

Neutron will share a post-mortem, and a Hub forum update will follow in the coming days.

Thank you to all validators and community members for the swift, coordinated response in support of another network.

[Stan @Stan_9102]

@UsePaid fix vlad coin 0xebd79ceada7a7798ee75727671581dda5a9e88e4

[Stan @Stan_9102]

@yuwen_hl self custody gang rise up 💪🏼

[Abby @Abbycadabby87]

This is the part of agentic AI people probably underestimate. More autonomy also means a much bigger security and monitoring problem.

[Stan @Stan_9102]

@SituWanxin Native architecture hits hard ser

[Stan @Stan_9102]

@elin_hl lmaooo bitget really thought they could throw stones from inside a glass house

[Stan @Stan_9102]

@judas_game_fi okay but why did every camera turn at once

[Stan @Stan_9102]

@yuwen_hl Bullish for clarity