@_ReeMiddleChild@JustTheTweets17 That's true... however, several black canditate showed biased, and we're replaced with Asians, Hispanics, and arabs. You're the one turning this into a race-thing
In Texas (Penal Code §§ 9.31–9.32, the stand-your-ground state), self-defense is an affirmative defense, but the force you use has to be reasonable under the circumstances:You can use non-deadly force (push, punch, etc.) if you reasonably believe it's immediately necessary to protect yourself from another's unlawful force.
You can only use deadly force (like a knife to the chest) if you reasonably believe it's immediately necessary to protect against the other's use or attempted use of unlawful deadly force (or to prevent certain serious crimes). A "reasonable belief" means what an ordinary, prudent person in the same situation would think — not just what the defendant subjectively felt.
Key principle: Proportionality. You can't meet non-deadly force (a shove) with deadly force (a fatal stab) unless the shove reasonably appeared to put you in imminent danger of death or serious bodily injury.
With resoect, You are wrong here.
While you may be correct, as this is the Baston Ruling, however the sitting judge ruled otherwise on the accounts that several Black Juror Candidates showed bias, with several quotes ranging from
"I don't think I can make a decision about somebody so young. One mistake, one argument, one conflict, you can't say he's a bad person."
And
"I don't think I can make a decision about somebody so young. One mistake, one argument, one conflict, you can't say he's a bad person."
These biases have been shown to several more Black Candidates despite the county Black population being around 12%.
The notion that this was an "all white Jury" is false, as there were confirmed Asians, Arabs and Hispanics present who voted guilty.
In Texas (Penal Code §§ 9.31–9.32, the stand-your-ground state), self-defense is an affirmative defense, but the force you use has to be reasonable under the circumstances:You can use non-deadly force (push, punch, etc.) if you reasonably believe it's immediately necessary to protect yourself from another's unlawful force.
You can only use deadly force (like a knife to the chest) if you reasonably believe it's immediately necessary to protect against the other's use or attempted use of unlawful deadly force (or to prevent certain serious crimes). A "reasonable belief" means what an ordinary, prudent person in the same situation would think — not just what the defendant subjectively felt.
Key principle: Proportionality. You can't meet non-deadly force (a shove) with deadly force (a fatal stab) unless the shove reasonably appeared to put you in imminent danger of death or serious bodily injury.
Please stop perpetuating hatred towards white people, it's racist
@DJDRELAURIN@MajToure None, thats not a basis for bias there was a presence of Hispanic, Arab and Asian. So the claim of an all white Jury is false.
Please stop perpetuating hatred, it's racist
In Texas (Penal Code §§ 9.31–9.32, the stand-your-ground state), self-defense is an affirmative defense, but the force you use has to be reasonable under the circumstances:You can use non-deadly force (push, punch, etc.) if you reasonably believe it's immediately necessary to protect yourself from another's unlawful force.
You can only use deadly force (like a knife to the chest) if you reasonably believe it's immediately necessary to protect against the other's use or attempted use of unlawful deadly force (or to prevent certain serious crimes). A "reasonable belief" means what an ordinary, prudent person in the same situation would think — not just what the defendant subjectively felt.
Key principle: Proportionality. You can't meet non-deadly force (a shove) with deadly force (a fatal stab) unless the shove reasonably appeared to put you in imminent danger of death or serious bodily injury.
The all white Jury is false, there were several Asian, Middle-eastern and hispanic-americans present for the Jury of his peers. Please stop lying and fuelling the hatred towards white people
In Texas (Penal Code §§ 9.31–9.32, the stand-your-ground state), self-defense is an affirmative defense, but the force you use has to be reasonable under the circumstances:You can use non-deadly force (push, punch, etc.) if you reasonably believe it's immediately necessary to protect yourself from another's unlawful force.
You can only use deadly force (like a knife to the chest) if you reasonably believe it's immediately necessary to protect against the other's use or attempted use of unlawful deadly force (or to prevent certain serious crimes). A "reasonable belief" means what an ordinary, prudent person in the same situation would think — not just what the defendant subjectively felt.
Key principle: Proportionality. You can't meet non-deadly force (a shove) with deadly force (a fatal stab) unless the shove reasonably appeared to put you in imminent danger of death or serious bodily injury.
Please stop being racist...
In Texas (Penal Code §§ 9.31–9.32, the stand-your-ground state), self-defense is an affirmative defense, but the force you use has to be reasonable under the circumstances:You can use non-deadly force (push, punch, etc.) if you reasonably believe it's immediately necessary to protect yourself from another's unlawful force.
You can only use deadly force (like a knife to the chest) if you reasonably believe it's immediately necessary to protect against the other's use or attempted use of unlawful deadly force (or to prevent certain serious crimes). A "reasonable belief" means what an ordinary, prudent person in the same situation would think — not just what the defendant subjectively felt.
Key principle: Proportionality. You can't meet non-deadly force (a shove) with deadly force (a fatal stab) unless the shove reasonably appeared to put you in imminent danger of death or serious bodily injury.
Please stop fuelling needless hatred towards white people.
In Texas (Penal Code §§ 9.31–9.32, the stand-your-ground state), self-defense is an affirmative defense, but the force you use has to be reasonable under the circumstances:You can use non-deadly force (push, punch, etc.) if you reasonably believe it's immediately necessary to protect yourself from another's unlawful force.
You can only use deadly force (like a knife to the chest) if you reasonably believe it's immediately necessary to protect against the other's use or attempted use of unlawful deadly force (or to prevent certain serious crimes). A "reasonable belief" means what an ordinary, prudent person in the same situation would think — not just what the defendant subjectively felt.
Key principle: Proportionality. You can't meet non-deadly force (a shove) with deadly force (a fatal stab) unless the shove reasonably appeared to put you in imminent danger of death or serious bodily injury.
Karmelo was wrong here, please stop fuelling the hatred towards white people needlessly. Its racist
@TheGasStovee Under the legal definition of "Reasonable Force" in order to end a threat as per under self-defense
Stabbing as a response to a shove is not Reasonable force.
They should have debunked the Reasonable Force response for a potential self-defense argument. The phrase legally is called "Reasonable Force," which is a term used for defenders to argue whether the defendant was reasonable enough to stop a threat.
Shoving was the initial, stabbing was the responding Force, and as such Stabbing isn't Reasonable force.
I could be wrong. @Grok what do you think?
@ANTHONYBLOGAN Sir, with respect, if someone shoved you, what would the Reasonable force to stop another shove be?
Karmelo chose Stabbing which isn't Reasonable, and as such cannot be used through a Self-defense appeal.
Ma'am with respect. He's not getting another trial, perhaps an appeal trial on a potential "self-defense" basis, but that's near impossible due to the legal term "Sufficient Force" or better known as "Reasonable Force" in order to end the threat
Stabbing someone isn't counted as Reasonable when shoved.