Stanford Law Review

A legal publication run by @StanfordLaw students since 1948, providing expert legal scholarship, analysis, and commentary. Tweets and RTs are not endorsements.

[Stanford Law Review @StanLRev]

Volume 78 is now complete! Read our complete Volume at https://t.co/WyGjGzJE5Q. Congratulations to the 52 outstanding Authors across Volume 78’s print and online journals, and thank you to Volume 78’s exceptional editors for their incredible dedication to the Stanford Law Review.

[Stanford Law Review @StanLRev]

Read Caldera's Note here: https://t.co/Q4rUq40bOm

[Stanford Law Review @StanLRev]

Volume 78’s final issue—Issue 6—is now live on our website! The Issue’s theme is APA at 80: What’s Next for Administrative Law?

[Stanford Law Review @StanLRev]

In a Note, Sophia Caldera advances a novel interpretation of the APA's judicial review provision as instructing courts to sever regulations where possible, arguing this preference for severability is a critical step as agency actions become vulnerable to judicial second-guessing.

[Stanford Law Review @StanLRev]

Read Rassieur's Note here: https://t.co/kalhTuRKw1

[Stanford Law Review @StanLRev]

Volume 78, Issue 5 is now live on our website!

[Stanford Law Review @StanLRev]

In a Note, Leo Rassieur calls for a recentering of Section 1988 in constitutional torts, arguing that the Supreme Court's actual importation of common-law elements into Section 1983 leaves constitutional violations unanswered and victims uncompensated.