Star X

[Star X @StarChen24]

#PP22 The whole purpose of marriage can be achieved with or without the government, the government cannot deprive a man and a woman of the right to achieve marriage, they can only decide when disputes arise between them.

[Star X @StarChen24]

#PP22 The society of husband and wife is actually similar to the society between parents and children. In this society, they are formed through a voluntary contract between men and women. The main purpose between them is the continuation of the race.

[Star X @StarChen24]

#PP22 Locke's believes that people in the state of nature are based on reason, they do not need someone to judge, everyone has all the rights given to them by natural law.

[Star X @StarChen24]

#PP22 Locke's political society takes the "state of freedom" as its logical starting point, and he believes that the state of freedom is complete state of freedom.

[Star X @StarChen24]

#PP22 I think Locke' theory about the emergence of political society is too ideal because not all of the people trust this kind of political society.

[Star X @StarChen24]

#PP22 People established contracts, confirmed private property rights through public consent. This point of view verifies the origin of the emphasis on private rights in the modern and contemporary British and American legal systems.

[Star X @StarChen24]

#PP22 Locker has his own limitations when he believes that per capita resources are also sufficient and effective in the state of contract society.

[Star X @StarChen24]

#PP22 Locke's labor theory of property right really made sense because property right were specifically related to labor for the first time, which set a precedent for the later classical economics and Marxist labor theory of value.

[Star X @StarChen24]

#PP22 The reason why "shared" does not work is because resources will always be scarce. This also meet the basic assumption of economics. Thus, it is impossible to meet everyone's needs.

[Star X @StarChen24]

#PP22 I think Locke does not fundamentally answer why "shared" is not good, and "private" is good. It is unconvincing from the aspect of "convenience" and "benefits" of human beings.

[Star X @StarChen24]

#PP22 Therefore, Locke does not need to describe from a historical point of view, because Locke's task is to construct a new theoretical system that is in line with the bourgeoisie's struggle for power and maintenance of power at that time.

[Star X @StarChen24]

#PP22 However, Locke's theory made sense because he was a political philosopher, not a historian, so the state of nature, the state of war, and the law of nature were all based on logical reasoning, not historical analysis.

[Star X @StarChen24]

#PP22 This is not a social or historical fact for the establishment of a nation because the vast majority of nations were built through violence and conquest, not consent.

[Star X @StarChen24]

#PP22 Humans may have been in a certain social state before they evolved into human beings, and there would not be a perfect natural state of freedom and equality that Locke said, so the state of the country cannot be based on consent.

[Star X @StarChen24]

#PP22 I think Locke's theory is too ideal because whether in history or in nature, we have difficulty finding what Locke called a "state of nature".

[Star X @StarChen24]

#PP22 Locke's "natural state" theory considers it to be a complete state, which is based on a "good nature theory ", that is, the well-known "human nature is inherently good at the beginning."I personally have reservations about this because it is limited for some cases.