@johnredwood Hello John
During that same show Paul Richards and JRM discussed military conscription for Brits and failure to comply resulting in imprisonment.
As we didn't get to hear your opinion during that segment, would you please now share that?
Thank you
🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
Please share this everywhere. All I have left is my voice. My story. My plea for help. I need a team effort here.
Together we are strong.
https://t.co/GFBuqM3OdW
I’ve given everything I possibly could to the cause. Risked it all and lost it all. I need you ALL to share and post everywhere and raise awareness of the @fa decision of a total football ban that is unprecedented even when child abuser officials are banned solely from children.
The conclusion that Dr Cartland represents a safeguarding risk to vulnerable adults and children is fundamentally misconceived.
The evidence relied upon does not establish a proper or rational connection between Dr Cartland’s conduct and any actual or prospective risk of harm to a child or vulnerable adult. In particular, his provision of letters supporting individuals who wished to exercise their right to refuse a COVID-19 vaccination cannot, without more, establish that he presents a safeguarding risk to children or vulnerable adults.
The purpose of those letters was to support individuals who had made their own decision concerning a medical intervention and wished to retain the ability to travel abroad, including to visit seriously ill or dying relatives. The underlying issue was patient autonomy, informed consent and the right of an individual to refuse medical treatment. Supporting an adult’s exercise of bodily autonomy is conceptually and factually very different from harming, exploiting, coercing or placing a child or vulnerable adult at risk.
The crucial question for a safeguarding assessment is therefore not whether the decision-maker agrees with Dr Cartland’s views concerning COVID-19 vaccination. It is whether there is credible evidence that his conduct demonstrates that he is likely to harm, or place at risk of harm, children or adults at risk in the context of football or other regulated activity.
No such evidential nexus has been identified. There is no suggestion that Dr Cartland harmed a child or vulnerable adult, attempted to do so, or that any child or vulnerable adult was the subject of the conduct relied upon in reaching the safeguarding conclusion.
It is particularly important that a distinction is maintained between professional or regulatory misconduct and safeguarding risk. A finding that conduct was inappropriate, unprofessional, dishonest or otherwise contrary to professional standards does not automatically establish that the individual presents a safeguarding risk to children or vulnerable adults. There must be a further evidence-based assessment of the nature of the conduct, the circumstances in which it occurred, the relevance of that conduct to the proposed role, and the likelihood of future harm.
The conclusion should therefore be reconsidered on the basis of the actual safeguarding evidence rather than by treating disagreement with COVID-19 vaccination policy, or support for an individual's refusal of medical treatment, as evidence of a propensity to harm vulnerable people.
In short, the assessment appears to conflate disagreement with a particular medical or regulatory position with safeguarding risk. Those are not synonymous. A safeguarding restriction of this seriousness requires a demonstrable and proportionate connection between the conduct relied upon and a genuine prospective risk to the particular vulnerable groups said to require protection.
For people like Dr Cartland America should adopt a similar visa system to the Russia
Russia offers asylum and residency to Christian families seeking "spiritual asylum" under a "Shared Values" program, launched in 2024.
This visa specifically targets conservative families, including devout Christians, who reject Western "neoliberal" values and align with Russian "traditional spiritual and moral values."
Reform's Robert Jenrick urges the police to 'arrest them', 'lock them up', 'do your worst'.
He says that same approach should be applied to the illegal migrant protestors.
An outrageous betrayal.
'Lipid nanoparticle used in mRNA vaccine promotes tumor metastasis in mouse model'
"Here, we demonstrate that LNP administration promotes tumor metastasis by inducing a systemic inflammatory response. In mouse models, LNP injection triggered acute neutrophil accumulation in the lungs, driven by the release of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) from necrotic muscle cells at the injection site.
In this study, we found that intramuscular LNP injection led to localized muscle cell necrosis, releasing mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) into the circulation as a damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP). Circulating mtDNA subsequently activated neutrophils via the TLR9-MyD88 and cGAS-STING pathways [31], [32], leading to their accumulation in the lungs and the formation of pro-metastatic niche through NET formation. Importantly, genetic ablation of key signaling components (Tlr9⁻/⁻, MyD88⁻/⁻, Sting⁻/⁻) abrogated this effect, confirming the causal role of LNP-induced inflammation in metastasis. While previous reports have highlighted the immunostimulatory properties of LNP, our findings suggest that their effects extend beyond conventional vaccine adjuvant, potentially influencing cancer progression. We do not categorize this as a “side effect” but rather as a critical consideration for the design and application of mRNA-LNP therapeutics."
Former German Health Minister confirms that Covid "vaccines" were administered without complete safety or efficacy data
Jens Spahn, Federal Minister of Health during the decisive phase of the crisis, stated two things that could no longer be hidden:
(i) that the covid "vaccines" were being "tested in the market"
(ii) that preventing transmission to others was never the goal of the "vaccine's" development – not even according to World Health Organization
@sleepeatshop@LintonAction@andyburnham@annaturley@ukhomeoffice@AlecShelbrooke 100% correct 👍
To many people are concerned about being called pathetic names under the uk control system. Racist, Biggot, Facist, NIMBY, antisemitic etc etc
Until people man the F’up and shout out a BIG FAT NO then the country will get it’s noses ‘rubbed in diversity’
This Pakistani Dr kept his job after sexually assaulting a 21 year old student nurse after blaming ‘different cultural norms’.
But the GMC struck Dr David Cartland off for warning patients of the risks from Covid 19 ‘vaccines’ !!!!
The GMC should be removed to protect the public
https://t.co/A3ZYNoUUb8
‘It is really clear now that vaccination in pregnancy is a very good thing to do for you and very good thing to do for your unborn baby. And now date demonstrating it’s actually very good thing to do for your newborn baby… anyone who is pregnant and not yet vaccinated please do so’ Chris whitty at PM briefing.
"We frighten the pants of everyone with the new strain…When do we deploy the new variant." Hancock
"A nasty, pernicious scare story, but that's all it is... I've never heard of a vaccine that affects fertility…. It is going to massively reduce the chances of anything bad happening to you…really couldn't fail to have some effect on transmission." Van Tam
"Anti-vaccine campaigns are total mumbo jumbo….We have been getting that vaccination that protects us and stops us infecting others…. Two doses of the vaccine are not sufficient against the Omicron variant. A third, booster dose is expected to restore the level of protection."
"The reason we have the vaccine success is because of capitalism, because of greed, my friends." Selection of BJ quotes 2020-21
‘People who refuse to get jabbed but whine about lockdowns really are a special breed of stupid selfish pr**ks….love the idea of covid vaccine passports for everywhere, flights, restaurants, clubs…..it’s time covid denying anti-vaxxer loonies have their bullsh!t bluff called and bar themselves from going anywhere that responsible citizens go’
"Those who are opposed to the coronavirus vaccine should be banned from air travel and NHS [National Health Service] services."
Piers Morgan (X posts)
"I'd urge everybody to have it... we must follow what we're told and not query it."
Mary Berry
“I hear what everyone says about freedom but they’re so keen on freedom that they’re going to restrict my freedom and that of millions like me…I hear what you’re saying. I don’t want them (people who refuse the vaccine) sitting next to me in the theatre…I don’t want them near me – they can exercise their freedom at home.
Edwina Currie
“I feel very confident [that the COVID-19 vaccine is safe] because the people involved are really doing their job well…I’m optimistic that by February, it’s very likely they’ll all prove very efficacious and safe.”
Bill Gates
"Mmm, vaccinations. Mmm. I'm getting a very good feeling about vaccination right at this moment…Free fries when you get vaccinated? Um, I got vaccinated. You're saying I could get these delicious fries? Wait a minute, there's also a burger element to this? ... This could be breakfast? Okay…I want you to look at this and think about, again, some people love hamburgers, some don't. I really want to respect all ways of life. But if this is appealing to you, just think of this when you think of vaccination."
NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio
"That choice doesn't seem so tough to me," he added. "Vaccinated person having a heart attack? Yes, come right on in. We'll take care of you. Unvaccinated guy who gobbled horse goo? Rest in peace, wheezy."
Jimmy Kimmel
"If you didn't get vaccinated, you got Covid, you don't get into a hospital. ... You go home and you die. ... It’s time for you to get it. Now if you don't have it, you're a f*ing idiot."
Howard Stern
"I don't care about your political beliefs. You are not allowed to infect anybody else just because you think you've got rights that are delusional. ... You are an enemy."
Gene Simmons
"This is now an anti-science aggression. ... We are seeing a historic tragedy where people are literally choosing to die rather than get a simple, safe intervention. It’s no longer just a personal choice; it’s a predatory movement."
Dr Peter Hotez
"It’s an arm of cowardice for the unvaccinated. ... I do think that it is a mandatory thing... It’s no different than having your headlights on in the night. You can't just drive around in the dark."
Sean Penn
Interesting thread 🧵 👇
Dr David Cartland and Dr Marcus DeBrun were targeted by regulatory bodies and threat intelligence mechanisms because their public actions directly crossed from opinion into what regulators classified as professional misconduct and a threat to public health operations:
Dr David Cartland (UK): His case was escalated through the UK General Medical Council (GMC) and Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS). The tribunal struck him off the medical register after finding he engaged in the sustained online harassment of medical professionals, offered unlawful COVID-19 exemption certificates, and leaked private practice management communications online to direct public backlash.
Dr Marcus DeBrun (Ireland): His oversight fell under the Irish Medical Council (IMC) rather than UK bodies. He faced regulatory inquiry and was found guilty of undermining public health guidelines after publicly opposing lockdown measures, anti-mask mandates, and vaccination policies, leading to the closure of his practice.
Both individuals were monitored and escalated because state security and medical regulators viewed their actions as operational disruption and professional non-compliance rather than protected commentary.
State security frameworks and government contractors executed monitoring and escalation through established administrative, intelligence, and regulatory mechanisms:
Threat Intelligence & Risk Assessment: Operational teams monitored public communications, digital activity, and direct actions targeting public health infrastructure. When individuals issued formal cease-and-desist letters, generated unauthorized documentation (such as non-standard exemption certificates), or coordinated targeted online campaigns against medical personnel, these activities were logged as operational threats rather than protected debate.
Whole-of-Government Escalation Pathways: Under integrated security frameworks, threat intelligence gathered by operational units was funneled to appropriate state entities. Interventions were categorized by the nature of the disruption:
Operational & Physical Disruptions: Escalated to law enforcement or site security teams to prevent physical access issues or harassment at medical facilities.
Professional Non-Compliance: Referred directly to professional regulatory authorities (such as the General Medical Council or Irish Medical Council) to initiate fitness-to-practise investigations regarding breaches of clinical guidelines and professional conduct standards.
Legal Tactics & Harassment: Reported to legal oversight bodies (such as the Solicitors Regulation Authority) when formal legal notices or threats of prosecution were used against local practices and regulators.
By framing these actions through the lens of critical infrastructure protection and professional standards enforcement, state security mechanisms and contractors addressed what they identified as direct operational friction and regulatory non-compliance.
It is an offence to add folic acid to flour.
Folic acid is "injurious to health".
But the same Act that calls it an offence is being used to mandate it!
Sign the petition below.
@LintonAction The people voted for Kevin Hollinrake MP who holds a strict stance on immigration, advocating for automatic deportation of illegal arrivals….. democracy in reality sure can be absurd eh?
@freedombus_1@BasilTheGreat You make a fair point….
Their Oxford educated Liberal MP, Calum Miller, emphasizes process, integration, and system integrity over immigration restrictions
So these folk are about to experience the ‘process’ that they voted for