Anyone considering legal action should first preserve everything: bank transfers, wallet transactions and TX hashes, addresses, screenshots of balances and withdrawals, emails, chats and any communication with Aurum/Neyro. Then report it through the proper authorities in your own country, police, prosecutors or the relevant financial authorities.
Personally, I’m giving them a little more time. The end of September is a reasonable deadline for me. By then I expect something concrete: real withdrawals, an identifiable audit, proof of reserves and a clear repayment plan.
If none of that exists by then, I’ll stop treating this as a “recovery process” and start treating it as a loss that requires formal action.
No threats, no hunting anyone down. Document everything and let the authorities follow the money.
AURUM continues holding seminars to attract new customers while existing investors still cannot access their own principal.
At the same time, they are organizing a Bali event for up to 250 promoters and leaders, with flights, accommodation, food and event costs potentially running into hundreds of thousands of dollars — possibly more.
They are announcing new products, new partner bonuses, new financing opportunities and international events while our money remains locked and there is still no clear date for the return of our principal.
So the question is simple:
If there is money for seminars, expansion, promoters and Bali, why is there no money to return what already belongs to us?
Stop selling the future.
Release our principal. Publish the audit. Show the reserves.
@GunterFehlinger By that logic, Europe should also have one mandatory salary. Same pay for everyone, right?
The world is changing before our eyes, geopolitically, economically, technologically and irreversibly. And this is what you choose to spend your energy on making everyone drive 100 km/h?
I hope you’re wrong, but at this point I can’t dismiss that scenario either. The longer withdrawals remain blocked while we get roadmaps, new products and “recovery” language instead of hard numbers, the harder it is to believe this is simply a technical problem.
What matters now is evidence. If this is a genuine recovery, show the reserves, explain the fund movements, publish the forensic findings and start paying users. If that doesn’t happen, then people absolutely should stop waiting quietly and take the evidence to law enforcement.
Blockchain records don’t disappear just because a project changes the narrative.
At this point, “recovery” feels less like recovery and more like narrative control.
Withdrawals are blocked, millions in fund flows remain unexplained, partnership posts are disappearing, and users are being told to be patient while a new roadmap and new products are promoted.
Maybe there is a legitimate explanation. Fine — then prove it.
Show the reserves.
Show the wallet trail.
Name the auditor.
Explain the missing funds.
Restore withdrawals.
Until then, “recovery plan” is just a label.
Blockchain, AI and the new internet consume enormous amounts of energy, water and infrastructure. Yet for the average person, the most visible benefit so far is often just faster access to information and more automation. At the same time, jobs are becoming less secure, wars and geopolitical instability are increasing, while climate change is putting growing pressure on people, animals and nature.
So the real question is no longer whether technology can advance, but who that advancement is actually for. If productivity, computing power and wealth keep increasing while ordinary people become less secure and the planet pays the bill, then we may be building a more advanced system but not necessarily a better society.
That’s exactly why I’m asking him directly. I don’t know what compensation he received from Neyro, so I’m not going to invent that part. But once you publicly lend your name and credibility to a project as a brand ambassador, you also inherit a responsibility to address your audience when things go wrong.
And what you described is exactly the pattern people have seen with many failed crypto projects before: when the money stops flowing, the exit story often becomes a hack, a legal freeze, an internal theft, a rogue employee, a “security incident” or some other event that supposedly explains why withdrawals suddenly stop. Sometimes those explanations are genuine, sometimes they aren’t. That’s why evidence matters.
People here can’t withdraw funds and serious questions remain unanswered. Show the reserves, show the trading records, show the forensic evidence and explain where the money went. Until then, silence from people who helped promote Neyro matters more than whatever deal brought them into the project in the first place.
Interesting , you’re willing to publicly show your own trades, entry prices and portfolio results. That’s exactly the kind of transparency Neyro users have been asking for.
So why the silence about the project you joined as a brand ambassador? Show us the Neyro trades, the reserves, the recovery numbers and tell your community clearly whether you still stand behind it.
Transparency shouldn’t stop when the questions become uncomfortable.
This is where Grok/xAI has a chance to be fundamentally different. “Free speech” means little if employees can’t raise uncomfortable security concerns internally. Build a culture where people are rewarded, not punished, for challenging leadership on security, espionage and systemic risk.
I’m looking at it from pretty much the same angle as you. Right now, the Ponzi explanation fits a lot of what we’re seeing.
What I don’t see is how this simply ends with everyone walking away, no explanation, no accountability and no refunds. Too much money is involved, too many people are affected, and the blockchain trail is public.
So yes, I understand your conclusion and I’m close to it myself — but I still think this has to end with either a credible explanation and real repayments, or a serious investigation into where the money went.