Patrick Wood

Verified account

@StopTechnocracy

Economic & market forecaster, speaker, author of Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation, Technocracy: The Hard Road to World Order

Southwest US

Joined September 2009

2.5K Following

26.7K Followers

8.1K Posts

Pinned Tweet

@StopTechnocracy

over 7 years ago

Do you know someone who needs to know about Technocracy? Give them the give of knowledge! #StopTechnocracy https://t.co/Fu7hyDjD3l

101

840

581

90

0

StopTechnocracy retweeted

Courtenay Turner

@CourtenayTurner

about 4 hours ago

🔴 LIVE TONIGHT — 9:30 PM CT I'm returning to Caravan to Midnight with @JohnBWellsCTM Join me and Patrick @StopTechnocracy for "If You Can Keep It" — 250 years after the founding, we're talking the ratification debates, the Digital Bill of Rights for the States, and whether constitutional self-government can survive digital governance. Tune in 👇

1

9

5

1

804

@StopTechnocracy

about 9 hours ago

Christians in the underground church China and in America share a common view that Technocracy is morphing into the “beast system” that is seen in Revelation chapter 13. This is likely the real bone of contention in the Technocrat mind. https://t.co/j0NRVemOQv

1

14

7

2

842

@StopTechnocracy

3 days ago

https://t.co/LU3Mvg6rVM

0

10

5

3

1K

Who to follow

Verified account

Contributing editor of https://t.co/i6XvCQ62PW, author of One Nation Under Blackmail. Sign up for my newsletter here https://t.co/Lex7h5JmGE

Verified account

The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts

Verified account

Catherine Austin Fitts, once a Wall Street exec and HUD official, helps you navigate opportunities and risks in today's global financial & political landscape.

@StopTechnocracy

3 days ago

https://t.co/lFOHWm44W5

1

18

11

1

966

@StopTechnocracy

3 days ago

https://t.co/ur7DAvVY6c

0

15

6

2

922

StopTechnocracy retweeted

Courtenay Turner

@CourtenayTurner

5 days ago

My response to this comment regarding “holes” in our Digital Bill of Rights: I think this is a fantastic opportunity for us to understand how the legal and civic system operates and the importance of the metaphysical firewall underneath the legal and political system! “Article XIII is the enforcement architecture — it’s titled “Digital Due Process and Remedies” for exactly this reason. It creates a private right of action against violators, public and private; provides for injunctive and declaratory relief, actual and liquidated damages, and attorneys’ fees; waives the state’s sovereign immunity; confers standing as a matter of state constitutional right; and authorizes escalating consequences for systemic violators, including revocation of licenses, disqualification from public contracts, and court-ordered structural remedies. Section 2 adds an exclusionary rule: evidence obtained in violation of the Bill is inadmissible. Section 4 protects whistleblowers and journalists. Article XIV then establishes independent oversight bodies with audit and investigative power. As for who sets the specific penalty schedule: the courts do, and the implementing legislature does — and that’s by design, not omission. This is a constitutional amendment, not a regulatory statute. A constitution declares rights, remedies, jurisdiction, and limits on power. It does not usually function as a full administrative code. Article III, Section 2 and Article XV, Section 6 expressly direct implementing legislation, which is where detailed penalty schedules belong. The Fourth Amendment doesn’t enumerate a schedule of fines either. It establishes the right, and courts, statutes, exclusionary rules, civil remedies, and enforcement doctrines give it teeth. Hard-coding every penalty into constitutional text would make the instrument brittle and quickly obsolete, especially in a technological field where the mechanisms of violation will change. And I’d gently add — this isn’t a knock on you. The distinction between a constitutional instrument and a regulatory statute, and the metaphysics underneath why rights are declared rather than granted, aren’t things most of us were ever taught. Civic formation at that level mostly stopped being transmitted many generations ago. Closing that gap is precisely what I’m working toward with the writing and the podcast — so questions like yours are exactly the right ones to be asking out loud. Working through them in public is how the understanding gets rebuilt. 🙏🏼 So thank you!” ~Courtenay Turner https://t.co/2bMokuOMOa https://t.co/iZ561brKws

CourtenayTurner's tweet photo. My response to this comment regarding “holes” in our Digital Bill of Rights:

I think this is a fantastic opportunity for us to understand how the legal and civic system operates and the importance of the metaphysical firewall underneath the legal and political system!

“Article XIII is the enforcement architecture — it’s titled “Digital Due Process and Remedies” for exactly this reason.

It creates a private right of action against violators, public and private; provides for injunctive and declaratory relief, actual and liquidated damages, and attorneys’ fees; waives the state’s sovereign immunity; confers standing as a matter of state constitutional right; and authorizes escalating consequences for systemic violators, including revocation of licenses, disqualification from public contracts, and court-ordered structural remedies.

Section 2 adds an exclusionary rule: evidence obtained in violation of the Bill is inadmissible. Section 4 protects whistleblowers and journalists. Article XIV then establishes independent oversight bodies with audit and investigative power.

As for who sets the specific penalty schedule: the courts do, and the implementing legislature does — and that’s by design, not omission.

This is a constitutional amendment, not a regulatory statute. A constitution declares rights, remedies, jurisdiction, and limits on power. It does not usually function as a full administrative code. Article III, Section 2 and Article XV, Section 6 expressly direct implementing legislation, which is where detailed penalty schedules belong.

The Fourth Amendment doesn’t enumerate a schedule of fines either. It establishes the right, and courts, statutes, exclusionary rules, civil remedies, and enforcement doctrines give it teeth. Hard-coding every penalty into constitutional text would make the instrument brittle and quickly obsolete, especially in a technological field where the mechanisms of violation will change.

And I’d gently add — this isn’t a knock on you. The distinction between a constitutional instrument and a regulatory statute, and the metaphysics underneath why rights are declared rather than granted, aren’t things most of us were ever taught. Civic formation at that level mostly stopped being transmitted many generations ago. Closing that gap is precisely what I’m working toward with the writing and the podcast — so questions like yours are exactly the right ones to be asking out loud. Working through them in public is how the understanding gets rebuilt. 🙏🏼 So thank you!” ~Courtenay Turner

https://t.co/2bMokuOMOa

https://t.co/iZ561brKws

CourtenayTurner's tweet photo. My response to this comment regarding “holes” in our Digital Bill of Rights:

I think this is a fantastic opportunity for us to understand how the legal and civic system operates and the importance of the metaphysical firewall underneath the legal and political system!

“Article XIII is the enforcement architecture — it’s titled “Digital Due Process and Remedies” for exactly this reason.

It creates a private right of action against violators, public and private; provides for injunctive and declaratory relief, actual and liquidated damages, and attorneys’ fees; waives the state’s sovereign immunity; confers standing as a matter of state constitutional right; and authorizes escalating consequences for systemic violators, including revocation of licenses, disqualification from public contracts, and court-ordered structural remedies.

Section 2 adds an exclusionary rule: evidence obtained in violation of the Bill is inadmissible. Section 4 protects whistleblowers and journalists. Article XIV then establishes independent oversight bodies with audit and investigative power.

As for who sets the specific penalty schedule: the courts do, and the implementing legislature does — and that’s by design, not omission.

This is a constitutional amendment, not a regulatory statute. A constitution declares rights, remedies, jurisdiction, and limits on power. It does not usually function as a full administrative code. Article III, Section 2 and Article XV, Section 6 expressly direct implementing legislation, which is where detailed penalty schedules belong.

The Fourth Amendment doesn’t enumerate a schedule of fines either. It establishes the right, and courts, statutes, exclusionary rules, civil remedies, and enforcement doctrines give it teeth. Hard-coding every penalty into constitutional text would make the instrument brittle and quickly obsolete, especially in a technological field where the mechanisms of violation will change.

And I’d gently add — this isn’t a knock on you. The distinction between a constitutional instrument and a regulatory statute, and the metaphysics underneath why rights are declared rather than granted, aren’t things most of us were ever taught. Civic formation at that level mostly stopped being transmitted many generations ago. Closing that gap is precisely what I’m working toward with the writing and the podcast — so questions like yours are exactly the right ones to be asking out loud. Working through them in public is how the understanding gets rebuilt. 🙏🏼 So thank you!” ~Courtenay Turner

https://t.co/2bMokuOMOa

https://t.co/iZ561brKws

CourtenayTurner's tweet photo. My response to this comment regarding “holes” in our Digital Bill of Rights:

I think this is a fantastic opportunity for us to understand how the legal and civic system operates and the importance of the metaphysical firewall underneath the legal and political system!

“Article XIII is the enforcement architecture — it’s titled “Digital Due Process and Remedies” for exactly this reason.

It creates a private right of action against violators, public and private; provides for injunctive and declaratory relief, actual and liquidated damages, and attorneys’ fees; waives the state’s sovereign immunity; confers standing as a matter of state constitutional right; and authorizes escalating consequences for systemic violators, including revocation of licenses, disqualification from public contracts, and court-ordered structural remedies.

Section 2 adds an exclusionary rule: evidence obtained in violation of the Bill is inadmissible. Section 4 protects whistleblowers and journalists. Article XIV then establishes independent oversight bodies with audit and investigative power.

As for who sets the specific penalty schedule: the courts do, and the implementing legislature does — and that’s by design, not omission.

This is a constitutional amendment, not a regulatory statute. A constitution declares rights, remedies, jurisdiction, and limits on power. It does not usually function as a full administrative code. Article III, Section 2 and Article XV, Section 6 expressly direct implementing legislation, which is where detailed penalty schedules belong.

The Fourth Amendment doesn’t enumerate a schedule of fines either. It establishes the right, and courts, statutes, exclusionary rules, civil remedies, and enforcement doctrines give it teeth. Hard-coding every penalty into constitutional text would make the instrument brittle and quickly obsolete, especially in a technological field where the mechanisms of violation will change.

And I’d gently add — this isn’t a knock on you. The distinction between a constitutional instrument and a regulatory statute, and the metaphysics underneath why rights are declared rather than granted, aren’t things most of us were ever taught. Civic formation at that level mostly stopped being transmitted many generations ago. Closing that gap is precisely what I’m working toward with the writing and the podcast — so questions like yours are exactly the right ones to be asking out loud. Working through them in public is how the understanding gets rebuilt. 🙏🏼 So thank you!” ~Courtenay Turner

https://t.co/2bMokuOMOa

https://t.co/iZ561brKws

CourtenayTurner's tweet photo. My response to this comment regarding “holes” in our Digital Bill of Rights:

I think this is a fantastic opportunity for us to understand how the legal and civic system operates and the importance of the metaphysical firewall underneath the legal and political system!

“Article XIII is the enforcement architecture — it’s titled “Digital Due Process and Remedies” for exactly this reason.

It creates a private right of action against violators, public and private; provides for injunctive and declaratory relief, actual and liquidated damages, and attorneys’ fees; waives the state’s sovereign immunity; confers standing as a matter of state constitutional right; and authorizes escalating consequences for systemic violators, including revocation of licenses, disqualification from public contracts, and court-ordered structural remedies.

Section 2 adds an exclusionary rule: evidence obtained in violation of the Bill is inadmissible. Section 4 protects whistleblowers and journalists. Article XIV then establishes independent oversight bodies with audit and investigative power.

As for who sets the specific penalty schedule: the courts do, and the implementing legislature does — and that’s by design, not omission.

This is a constitutional amendment, not a regulatory statute. A constitution declares rights, remedies, jurisdiction, and limits on power. It does not usually function as a full administrative code. Article III, Section 2 and Article XV, Section 6 expressly direct implementing legislation, which is where detailed penalty schedules belong.

The Fourth Amendment doesn’t enumerate a schedule of fines either. It establishes the right, and courts, statutes, exclusionary rules, civil remedies, and enforcement doctrines give it teeth. Hard-coding every penalty into constitutional text would make the instrument brittle and quickly obsolete, especially in a technological field where the mechanisms of violation will change.

And I’d gently add — this isn’t a knock on you. The distinction between a constitutional instrument and a regulatory statute, and the metaphysics underneath why rights are declared rather than granted, aren’t things most of us were ever taught. Civic formation at that level mostly stopped being transmitted many generations ago. Closing that gap is precisely what I’m working toward with the writing and the podcast — so questions like yours are exactly the right ones to be asking out loud. Working through them in public is how the understanding gets rebuilt. 🙏🏼 So thank you!” ~Courtenay Turner

https://t.co/2bMokuOMOa

https://t.co/iZ561brKws

1

16

11

4

869

@StopTechnocracy

4 days ago

A Musical Drama: The End of Tyranny https://t.co/5MhooP5UXH

0

2

0

1

511

StopTechnocracy retweeted

Courtenay Turner

@CourtenayTurner

4 days ago

@CowboySkater @ShannonJoyRadio @StopTechnocracy They are technocrats. Thank you for calling them out appropriately. “Technofascists” plays into the dialectic and helps advance technocracy.

1

14

6

1

403

@StopTechnocracy

5 days ago

https://t.co/dFLkkMJXAG

1

29

12

2

1K

@StopTechnocracy

8 days ago

https://t.co/lf4PmuBHqD

1

11

5

4

911

@StopTechnocracy

10 days ago

Message From Patrick Wood on Independence Day https://t.co/IQPrC5d1Dh via @YouTube

2

24

9

4

1K

@StopTechnocracy

10 days ago

https://t.co/0sFyhFO4T1

0

7

4

0

828

@StopTechnocracy

10 days ago

Technocracy’s Digital ID Is Being Smuggled In On The Backs Of Children https://t.co/SaF9pqhmyM

3

31

18

8

1K

@StopTechnocracy

12 days ago

https://t.co/ttMvtHhYgg

0

14

7

5

1K

@StopTechnocracy

12 days ago

https://t.co/bTxxlYmITa

0

27

8

3

1K

@StopTechnocracy

14 days ago

https://t.co/kuT0Ysn3kM

0

8

7

3

984

@StopTechnocracy

17 days ago

https://t.co/gtfEv4lbvs

0

18

13

5

1K

@StopTechnocracy

18 days ago

How Trump’s New Quantum EO Locks Technocracy Into Place https://t.co/FDaqBv2im4

2

21

17

6

972

@StopTechnocracy

18 days ago

https://t.co/ZP7uUpF9zQ

0

13

9

1

1K

@StopTechnocracy

21 days ago

https://t.co/B3tPqJi6DT

1

28

13

4

1K

Last Seen Users on Sotwe

Trends for you

Most Popular Users