@realMrTruthBomb@NotOpCue@NewsTreason @justicecometh @Tracingjustice @netflix
Anyone can make a Q Drop!
Q DROP #123 11/6/2017
“Nothing is random.
Everything has meaning.
Q”
Netflix drops Lizzie Borden on 9/17.
Lizzie Borden.
17.
An AXE.
Story/ 1892 back in the spotlight
@realMrTruthBomb “Happy Q Day”what specifically are we celebrating as confirmed? Give me one Q “proof” from those 26–50 that was documented before the event, specific enough to be falsifiable, and independently verified afterward. No timestamps/numbers that only look meaningful in hindsight.
@OgAn0n661 If every outcome can become a Q proof afterward, what would actually prove the theory wrong? AI succeeds—it was planned. AI causes chaos—it was a “show me.” Trump gets opposition—it’s “think mirror.” At some point, there needs to be a falsifiable prediction.
@thestoicplumber Okay, but “Assange is back” is exactly what I’m asking about. Back how? What specifically happened today that was predicted beforehand for September 17? Give me the concrete event—not another connection after the fact.
@WillyWonka589@MatrixQdeBreakr@JulianAssange Okay, but “Assange is back” is exactly what I’m asking about. Back how? What specifically happened today that was predicted beforehand for September 17? Give me the concrete event—not another connection after the fact.
@TraderGirlQ Interesting connections, but coincidence isn’t causation. No comet impact, no bridge falling, no Rapture or DNA upgrade today (or on the earlier dates either). Numerology + movie references ≠ prophecy.
@OgAn0n661 Okay, but ‘Sessions was on deck’ was posted in 2018. It’s been 8 years—what specific, verifiable event are we still waiting for that would prove this interpretation was actually correct?
@thestoicplumber “Watching cuz mood” 😂 Okay, but what exactly are we watching for? What specific, verifiable event would make you say, “Yep, this is what the post was pointing to”?
@lioness_5c “Potential seismic activity” is pretty broad. Is there a specific location, magnitude, and time window being predicted here? That would give us something concrete to check afterward.
@BrandoIncognito Okay, but what’s the actual method here? If changing ‘218’ to ‘two eighteen,’ ‘two one eight,’ or ‘two hundred eighteen’ gives completely different numbers, how do you decide which version is the ‘correct’ one before seeing the result you want?
This page is simple: PROVE IT. 🔎
If you make a prediction, I’ll save it.
If you give a date, I’ll check it.
If you say something happened, I’ll look for the evidence.
No decoding it differently afterward.
No “it happened behind the scenes.”
No moving the date.
@SurfinPatriot What exactly is the 9/17 delta proving here? The 2018 Q post just linked a White House tweet and said ‘WWG1WGA.’ What specific, verifiable event was predicted then that actually happened today? I’m genuinely trying to separate a prediction from matching dates after the fact.
@OgAn0n661 Two months until what, exactly? What’s one specific, verifiable thing you expect to happen by then? I’m genuinely curious what would count as ‘telling the tale.’
@TRKShady Okay, but what’s the actual prediction here? What specifically is supposed to happen on the 21st–23rd that we can come back and fact-check afterward? 👀
@Kimberlyrja8 Can anyone point to the specific Executive Order that supposedly changed who owns or controls the Federal Reserve? Not a Q drop or interpretation—the actual EO number and wording. Because the Fed itself says the Board of Governors is a federal agency accountable.
@WOLVERINE4w ‘Soon’ and ‘behind the scenes’ are doing a lot of heavy lifting here. What’s one specific, publicly verifiable thing that has actually happened that proves this network is being dismantled?
@LeighAnnEskew Okay, but what exactly does Trump wearing a red tie and raising his fist prove? He’s worn that combination plenty of times. What makes this specific instance evidence of Q rather than matching an old post after the fact?
@17Grasshopper Okay, but what exactly is being ‘decoded’ here? Obama’s family dog passed away, and now that’s being treated as secret comms because Q mentioned ‘Hussein’ and ‘dog’ years ago? What’s the specific, verifiable connection beyond matching words after the fact?