@Quadsh0tz@btbsoco So let's say you get the atheist to believe but they don't know where to go after. Do you say, "look up Jay Dyer debate with anyone"?
@DrainBammag@camhigby @FearlessDebates @ReawakenUSA Random strangers, as in law makers, have the right to decide whether you have th right to unjustly kill other human persons or not. Random strangers don't have the right to decide whether you should be killed on-demand or not.
Pretty simple.
Hope that helps.
They'll call a child conceived in rape rape a "rapist's spawn."
They'll call an unborn human being a "parasite."
They'll call deliberately killing someone "health care."
This isn't medicine. It's propaganda to justify the killing of millions of innocent human beings.
@VivashwanSingh@Nishant28790904@taah_zzzz@theliverdoc You did miss the point. He never suggested that the outcome in this case did not matter. He already said it was good the baby survived. His point wasn't to prioritize protocol over saving the baby at all.
@TheOutsiderHum1@Darrandre@darwintojesus The demonstration is already in your face, you dope. That's the point. The demonstration has gone right over your head. Your power level is too low for this.
@kepilar77@Darrandre@darwintojesus A person with a bit of common sense would have no problem understanding that he did, in fact, answer the question by demonstrating how self-defeating the other guy's position is.
Pretty astonishing to see the lack of intellectual capacity with some of you guys. ๐
@TheOutsiderHum1@Darrandre@darwintojesus You're not more likely to understand a point if you can't even understand a straight forward demonstration of your own position in your face. ๐๐คฆโโ๏ธ
Anyway, this is a waste of time. Keep being clueless.
@TheOutsiderHum1@Darrandre@darwintojesus Yes I know that you can't see it. The irony is completely lost on you. If you can't see it, I don't think you'll understand much of anything even if we explain it to you.