StuffNNonsense

Writing about stuff I find ridiculous or irksome

[StuffNNonsense @StuffNNonense]

It tells me I should leave the country because so many of the people running it don’t understand the most basic things about how British law and politics actually work.

[Steph Richards: (She/her) - Say NO to hate. @PompeySteph]

101 MPs have now signed EDM 240 - as a norm, most EDM's get a handful of signatures.

On average, just one EDM in 75 reaches 100 signatories.

That should tell you something @bphillipsonMP @Keir_Starmer @UKLabour @EHRC

https://t.co/v3phgj26Me

[StuffNNonsense @StuffNNonense]

@SamanthaNiblet4 You are not the good person you think you are.

Your lack of critical thinking and real engagement with opposing ideas indicate an ideological stance, not a moral one.

[StuffNNonsense @StuffNNonense]

@datadriven_tdoc If he was decent human being worthy of respect he’d know he shouldn’t be taking sports from female athletes.

[StuffNNonsense @StuffNNonense]

@cityoflondon This is, quite literally, an illegal policy.

I am, frankly astonished you have not had better legal advice.

Morons.

[StuffNNonsense @StuffNNonense]

Arguing about the wrong law, arguing that women should not be allowed to congregate without interference from
men, denying the reality of same sex attraction.

Sexist, homophobic, stupid.

The union movement is a lost cause and certainly not the friend of working class women.

[Unison London LGBT+ @unisonldnlgbt]

Opposing the EHRC guidance:
Over the next 30 days, UNISON is trying to convince as many MPs as possible to oppose the guidance on single sex spaces. The union wants examples of how the guidance is unworkable in your workplace.

Please send examples to [email protected]

[StuffNNonsense @StuffNNonense]

@soniasodha So many women. Traitors to their sex, all of them.

And the public demonstration of stupidity at the lowest level is quite breathtaking taking.

[StuffNNonsense @StuffNNonense]

@TVAddictStill @soniasodha The SC is the highest court in the land, and its decisions are final. Supreme Court… clue is in the name.

Only new legislation specifically aimed at removing women’s right to assemble freely without interference from men will change it.

Good luck with that.

[StuffNNonsense @StuffNNonense]

@GenderRealistNZ Get them to explain their position as clearly and loudly as possible in the most public way possible..

Get them to explain clearly that women must allow men in their private spaces and lesbians must accept male sexual partners.

The truth will expose them.

[StuffNNonsense @StuffNNonense]

@PulaRJS How about this. We make it socially unacceptable for men, even the ones that don’t want to be seen as men, to go into women’s spaces.

Then, there will be no need for policing because everyone will adhere to the social contract that men stay out of women’s spaces.

Easy.

[StuffNNonsense @StuffNNonense]

@KirstieMAllsopp Not facts or biology ? So how do they know who to enslave?

Really Kirstie. Brain engaged please.

[StuffNNonsense @StuffNNonense]

@JustinBonomo Israel is a democracy with proportional representation.

20% of the citizen population are arabs, with other ethnicities represented. At least 10 seats in parliament are not Jewish parties, 1000’s of non Jews serve in the army.

What exactly will this different state look like?

[StuffNNonsense @StuffNNonense]

@LordWalney It is not women’s job to deal with the problems men have because some of them have issues. That is men’s problem and they should deal with it without forcing women to make any compromises on their safety or privacy.

Leave women out of this. It’s not their problem to solve.

[StuffNNonsense @StuffNNonense]

@LoganLevkoff How many hoops are enough ?

How do you not see you are encouraging vulnerable people to take the step of radical surgical interventions.

What if they don’t? Have they jumped thru enough hoops?

I urge you to take some time to really think hard about this.

[StuffNNonsense @StuffNNonense]

@JuoPosts No. That just simply is not true.

If you allow any male at all into a space, you must allow all males into that space otherwise you risk direct discrimination on the basis of sex.

[StuffNNonsense @StuffNNonense]

@GyllKing @speakoutsister If only you could see how utterly ridiculous that statement is.

As I said, people like you are insufferable.

I’m done here. Don’t expect further response.

[StuffNNonsense @StuffNNonense]

@GyllKing @speakoutsister Do you or do you not think Sal should be able to exclude males from her app?

[StuffNNonsense @StuffNNonense]

@GyllKing @speakoutsister It is however your job to back up what you claim to be the truth.

[StuffNNonsense @StuffNNonense]

@GyllKing @speakoutsister How is it you think that’s not exactly what you’re doing ?

[StuffNNonsense @StuffNNonense]

@GyllKing @speakoutsister What I am is someone who thinks shaming lesbians for not wanting to date or engage with males in physical relationships is not on the side of good or virtuous.

And btw I’d like a source for that number, and the question asked.

[StuffNNonsense @StuffNNonense]

@akuareindorf @ForWomenScot Are not 2.36 and 2.39 in the new ehrc guidance completely contradictory . How do you change attributes of sex without medical intervention of some sort ?