Ryan 🇬🇧

To see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.

[Ryan 🇬🇧 @SubjectDisloyal]

Always the women.

[Disgruntled Brit @DBrit87]

@BROKENBRITAIN0 There's always one there to comfort the beasts... fucking moron

[Ryan 🇬🇧 @SubjectDisloyal]

@CrackerKirkz @LisaJon64241298 @TrumpsBestMate @jax3230430 Internet troll 🥱

[Ryan 🇬🇧 @SubjectDisloyal]

@LisaJon64241298 @CrackerKirkz @TrumpsBestMate @jax3230430 Exactly that's all correct. I was generous with the comparisons.

[Ryan 🇬🇧 @SubjectDisloyal]

@CrackerKirkz @LisaJon64241298 @TrumpsBestMate @jax3230430 You're comparing apples and oranges. Average take home pay in the UK is 2,200. Average take home in the US is 3,300.

So getting 3k on benefits (WELFARE) is crazy. Maybe keep your mouth shut and out of UK business.

🤡

[Ryan 🇬🇧 @SubjectDisloyal]

@CrackerKirkz @LisaJon64241298 @TrumpsBestMate @jax3230430 I'm commenting because I sympathise with people. The wages are low. Yes you can do better but like I said it's not a lot more. Higher management at my workplace don't even get 3k after tax. The salaries are rigid here. Americans beg for a pay rise. Here it goes through unions.

[Ryan 🇬🇧 @SubjectDisloyal]

@CrackerKirkz @TrumpsBestMate @jax3230430 Nitwit. Most people in the UK get around this, you'd have to be in London to earn more, and it's not a lot more.

[Ryan 🇬🇧 @SubjectDisloyal]

@ErfinderRotwang @JustTheTru75 @AmericaPapaBear I'm also respectful. You don't know me. But I'd be the last person on their mind if a time came. I'm not fucking stupid but it sounds like you are. You're naive if you think these people care deeply about you. Islam first. Judaism first. African first. White's we're all equal 🤣

[Ryan 🇬🇧 @SubjectDisloyal]

@ErfinderRotwang @JustTheTru75 @AmericaPapaBear That's your problem and why our country is in a mess then. Too scared to be racist. When all it boils down to is to prioritising your own. I work all over and I'm around different types of people and they all group together...apart from us. We think it is necessary to be kind 🥴

[T0NE 🇬🇧🤝🇺🇸 @T0N3N3]

@TruthFairy131 They are not like us, and You don't understand.

[Ryan 🇬🇧 @SubjectDisloyal]

@999JackD @Nestle_is_Evil @benwehrman Could call it A Ryan's? Then it's less obvious

[Ryan 🇬🇧 @SubjectDisloyal]

@cryptod00dle @RupertLowe10 They bet on your kindness that's why you think it isn't a bad shout. Just like those parents give in and give their kids whatever they want. That kindness is rotting brains. Forgetting what's right and wrong.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

A Restore Britain Government will repeal Starmer's social media ban and let parents parent.

[Wide Awake Media @wideawake_media]

"Online safety" laws and age verification mandates have absolutely NOTHING to do with protecting children.

You cannot stop under-16s from accessing a website without checking the age of everyone who visits it. And you cannot check everyone's age without forcing them to prove who they are.

"Child safety" is the cheese in the mousetrap.

Laws sold under the banner of "child protection" constitute a Trojan horse for a system requiring every adult to verify their identity before they can speak, read, or post online. The child is merely an emotional shield. The adult is the real target.

And once that infrastructure exists, the pretext can be swapped out at will.

Today it is pornography, social media and "harmful content". Tomorrow it is messaging apps and online banking. Soon after it is your ability to access the internet at all—each incremental step gated behind a digital ID you are required to keep in good standing.

It's no accident that the exact same "online safety" agenda is being rolled out across the entire Western world simultaneously, with each national government reaching for a slightly different pretext to justify the same outcome—a verified digital identity standing between you and the open internet.

Different countries. Different pretexts. Same infrastructure.

They are not building a system to keep children safe. They are building the identity layer for a permission-based internet—orchestrated from the supranational level by people you never elected—where access to information itself becomes conditional on obedience.

The point is not to make the internet safer. The point is to make anonymous access impossible.

Because a person who can read, speak, organise and dissent anonymously is difficult to control. A person whose most intimate online activity is anchored to a state-monitored digital ID is not.

Once every account, search, post, payment, message and website visit is tied to a verified identity, the internet stops being a public square and becomes a monitored enclosure.

But the gate only closes if people accept "online safety" laws at face value.

[Ryan 🇬🇧 @SubjectDisloyal]

@kevlondon4 What a joke. Makes your blood boil. Deport these lot too, fucking jobsworths.

[AmericanPapaBear™ @AmericaPapaBear]

Modern problems require not so modern solutions.

If Sikhs in the UK get to carry around a foot-long knife, why not allow native British citizens to carry around 100-year-old battle rifles?

Call it a culturally significant ancestor vibe!

What do you guys think?

[Needle @Ltrs_Frm_Across]

@elonmusk This is why mass remigration and a total ban on new migration are the only solution to the UK's problem. Major cities, like London and Birmingham, have been swamped by Third World migrants who have no connection to the UK, and in many cases despise the country. Millions must go.

[Ryan 🇬🇧 @SubjectDisloyal]

@StephenUzzell2 @StuartStokoeUK You say that as if it's a bad thing.

Are those neo Nazis in the room with you now?

[The Real World University @jointrwuni_]

🚨Throwback to Andrew Tate protesting and defending the name of Jesus Christ and the last supper in Romania 🇷🇴

“They are satanists, they hate God, they hate Jesus, they want to corrupt your children with LGBT”

[conspiracybot @conspiracyb0t]

The Digital Prison