People are coping and saying it's because of bad lighting or something. Here's a simple shot of some practical clones from Andor. All they have to do is stay in one place for one simple shot and stand in formation, but they still all look like a bunch of cheap, awkward, differently sized and proportioned cosplayers. And this was probably the BEST take.
Even the CGI clones in Episode II look and perform better in all the ways that actually matter. They look like competent, cloned soldiers wearing sturdy, durable armor. Yet they can also move in a swift and coordinated manner, and perform actions requiring physical strength, precision, and agility.
Importantly, every clone in every shot can be carefully adjusted by the animators, whereas in live action (as we've seen) it's a struggle to get a shot where every clone looks credible and consistent, even after multiple takes.
Lucas going all-CGI with the clones was a controversial decision even within ILM, some of whose artists tried repeatedly to talk him out of it. But Lucas knew from hard experience exactly what the limitations of practical troopers would be. He made an excellent call, maybe one of the most important calls he made on those films from a visual standpoint, and he's been vindicated on this matter as he has been on so many others.
Dunno if this is a hot take but clone troopers look leagues better in CGI than live action.
The fact a 20+ year old movie looks better than a modern show with a similar production budget is crazy