@ravyvroom You have to provide evidence that the penalty was wrongly given. If your evidence isn't good enough to have it over turned, you have to serve the penalty at the next race and risk another penalty for not serving in the original race. This is not going to see some new precedent.
@JaelandoTweets@Manu_p74@MatthwDayton That's because you view gay as strictly sexual. You don't see how same sex couples could be as in love as any hetero couple. It's not JUST about sex the same way hetero couples aren't only interested in each other for sex.
@papayastri17@fia This only works if you have evidence the penalty was wrongly given. You can't avoid the penalty and appeal unless you have the evidence that proves otherwise. Appealing a track limits penalty only to show video of them going off track will get you another penalty for not serving
@unbowedheretic@rohanwontsleep Does it really matter? Either way, both benefit. The landlord needs it maintained, the renter wants it maintained and is willing to do it. It also saves the landlord money by them doing it. Then the landlord took something that benefited him and made it cost the person doing it.
@matchadoll_69@Pandorus__ What does it have to do with anything? As long as kids aren't being neglected, who cares who they hook up with (as long as they both agree and it stays within their agreed upon rules)?
@Mthandeni975@CweBophi Well thank gosh at least one of them was smart! She protected herself, him, and any other partners she may (or may not) have had. Too bad he couldn't do the same for himself or his partner.