Claude Code automatically adds itself to the commit metadata "Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus <[email protected]>".
I strongly disagree with crediting Claude as a commit co-author. It is a tool I'm paying for, not a copyright holder, not an author. We don't credit Visual Studio.
Dear Government of Malawi,
We need to speak honestly. That statement you issued about 661 Malawian nationals, including women and children, fleeing "xenophobic attacks" in South Africa is a lie. And you know it. There were no attacks. No violence. No xenophobia, your people were the violent ones against our law enforcement officers . There was only South Africa enforcing its borders something you refuse to do in your own country.
The 661 Malawians did not flee violence. They fled poverty. They fled your failure. They fled a government that has sat on its hands while its people starve. They crossed borders illegally, seeking what you should have provided at home jobs, healthcare, schools, dignity. And when South Africa said "enough," you are blaming us. You are calling us xenophobic. You deflected. Because admitting the truth would mean admitting you have failed.
You have failed your people. You have failed your duty as leaders. You have subjected Malawians to poverty, unemployment, and despair while you sit comfortably, collecting salaries, flying abroad, and issuing press releases. You have asked South Africa to carry the burden of your incompetence. And we are tired.
We do not hate Malawians or any African person . We are not xenophobic. We are frustrated, frustrated that our clinics are flooded, our schools overcrowded, our jobs taken, while your people are not counted, not budgeted for, not accounted for. Where is the money to support them? Where is the planning? Where is the accountability?
You need to look in the mirror. Ask yourself, why do Malawians leave? Why do they risk death to reach South Africa? Because you have given them nothing. You have built nothing. You have promised everything and delivered nothing.
We blame you. And we are done carrying your burden. Fix your country. Ask us how we did it, how we built clinics, roads, schools and do the same. But stop blaming us for your failure. That is not leadership. That is cowardice. And we have had enough.
@Teboho_McCoy The question is a bit too broad. Like the one reply mentioned.. build and you'll eventually pick up what's important. Read, a lot.
Some thing wont make sense at first but I like these two websites.
https://t.co/Ko1l0gGVrS
and
https://t.co/PtG8AiUppv
Good day Dr Nyakabawu, hope this response finds you well. I respectfully submit to you that to invoke Derrida’s concept of absolute hospitality as a justification for allowing illegal immigrants to remain without condition is to overlook the critiques that hospitality, when detached from sovereignty, becomes incoherent. Indeed, while the stranger must not be treated as an enemy, the host retains the sovereign prerogative to refuse entry or revoke any permit of admission. I invite you to consider the work of scholars such as Julia Kristeva, Jean-Luc Nancy, and Etienne Balibar, who have each highlighted the limits of Derrida’s formulation and the necessity of grounding hospitality within legal and political frameworks. Thanks for engaging.🇿🇦🙏🏽
@SedikoR You have patience, long lasting patience. If the views of the Dr were genuine I think they'd got by the second post. They are simply replying to reply.
Dr Dube, I trust you had a fulfilling day. In South Africa, June 16 is commemorated as a public holiday (Youth day), remembering the youth of this country who fought against apartheid laws. Coincidentally, it is also my birthday, which made the day particularly memorable.🎂🎉
My good Dr, your proposition that “An African can never be a foreigner in Africa” is rhetorically compelling but analytically unsustainable when examined through the frameworks of international law, political sovereignty, and socio-economic realities. While your claim resonates within Pan-Africanist thought, which rejects colonial divisions, it falters under the current weight of institutional and legal structures that regulate interstate relations across the continent.
I respectfully submit that from the perspective of idealism, your statement reflects a normative aspiration for continental unity, where identity transcends national boundaries. This aligns with the writings of thinkers such as Immanuel Kant, Woodrow Wilson, and Alfred Zimmern, who emphasised the transformative potential of law, morality, and institutions in overcoming divisions. However, realism provides a sobering counterpoint by emphasising sovereignty, national interest, and the enforcement of territorial boundaries. As it stands African states are constitutionally sovereign, each with defined borders and citizenship regimes. Scholars such as Thucydides, Machiavelli, and Hans Morgenthau remind us that power and state survival remain decisive in shaping interstate relations.
My good Dr, I am of the view that you are fully aware of the institutional presence of immigration departments, visa systems, and deportation procedures across all African states. Alongside the African Union’s Protocol on Free Movement of Persons (2018), these institutions confirm that “foreignness” is not just rhetoric but a legal category actively recognised and enforced by all African states.
On a lighter note, just try entering any African country without legal documentation to test your “An African can never be a foreigner in Africa” sermon. You may find yourself given until the 30th of June to voluntarily deport yourself, or else be frog-marched out of that country.
Thanks for engaging.🇿🇦🙏🏽
The problem with a "native" language programming language isn't whether we need one or not.. our language hasn't developed with the times and programming borrows concepts from other disciplines..
Just directly translating "function" to "sebenza" doesn't link the same concept to the meaning or the definition of f(x) for example. The way we write programs is for us to reason about them, to computers it's all symbols.
You’ve seen #ThePolygamist and saw how Jonasi went out… just know, that is not just TV drama, it is real life consequences.
Multiple partners without protection increase your risk of STIs and HIV. Ignoring treatment does not make it go away, it makes it worse.
Knowing your status is power. Using protection is responsibility. Taking your treatment is survival.
If you stopped treatment, come back, reinitiate and stay on it to achieve an undetectable viral load. This means living a healthier life with zero risk of passing HIV on to others.
Remember, prevention options such as PrEP and Lenacapavir can help protect against HIV, but condoms are still essential to protect against STIs like gonorrhoea, syphilis, herpes, chlamydia and more, as well as unwanted pregnancies.
Credit: Clip from The Polygamist on @NetflixSA
#AsibeHealthyGP #EndAIDS #STIAwareness
Bingo.
This is exactly why you don’t care, because you are privileged.
For those whose fathers were not presidents, whose fathers had to compete for low-paying informal jobs, they could only wish it was their father who got that Wimpy job, and not an illegal Zimbabwean.
Is it a coincidence that SA 🇿🇦 and Ireland 🇮🇪 have at almost the same exact time gone to the streets for the same issue?
I wonder what they’ve done recently to piss off a small country that’s just IS not REAL..
Great breakdown by the way…