Hi @jamescham - here is the first video clip (3min) from that session - @m_sendhil and @SuthaKamal - exploring the ability of AIs to impart a form of scientific understanding that each of us yearns - an understanding of ourselves
@creativedlab
https://t.co/TlfiVr9U3a
@rezendi@pkedrosky@stevemagness Twight’s breathing ladders are great for teaching this… you’ve got only N breaths before your next set, so you learn to slow the them down to consume as much air however you can while trying to let your heart rate recover under load.
@ThorTorrens@zooko lol
Saying you “respectfully disagree”, isn’t an argument.
there’s no way to square absolute privacy with AML/KYC, and either you and @zooko know it and you’re frauds, or you don’t…
Lol, also zCash admits it can’t prove it hasn’t been exploited. https://t.co/kMpGO1Gwsv
@jlax I think App Store is fair. They invested billions in a platform… why don’t they get to decide price of access? Maybe agree re Books and Music.
The ad tech market is a cesspool. I agree re your characterization, I don’t feel bad for those who got kneecapped.
@jlax Again agree. But TSX Venture companies are entities subject to laws, with individuals who can hold personal liability. Again, highly imperfect (it’s not like we didn’t have fraud before crypto)… but the backstop of the courts isn’t worth nothing.
@jlax Re white papers being obfuscatory and code malleable, yes, I agree. It wasn’t for Coinbase to regulate. That doesn’t imply the correctness of jumping in without regs.
Re Apple: I think whomever invests in building a platform has the right to make security design decisions.
@jlax Because those risky stocks are still regulated and have some legal requirements around disclosure. It’s imperfect as hell, but I’m waiting to see crypto’s better answer.
What if the biggest consequence of (open-source) AI is that it makes each human infinitely more interesting, aware, creative and productive; and so the cost of coercing any human asymptotes to infinity?