@zkky324 公有制的“社会公平”逻辑 vs 私有制的“资本增值”逻辑。
展开为四个维度的精准对比:
所有制:生产资料公有 vs 私有制。
驱动力:满足人民需求(计划+市场,民生导向) vs 追求利润最大化(市场自发,资本导向)。
分配方式:按劳分配(终极目标按需分配) vs 按资本、土地、劳动等市场要素贡献分配。
@Joel_P_Atkinson Even though there wasn't a single Chinese participant in the whole meeting?Smearing China with a dubious paper, this politician overlooks the cost to his country.That's not a decent way to behave
@KareemRifai Happy education robs them of your ability to think。You take some random piece of paper from nowhere and dare to claim it came from the Chinese government? Could I just grab any paper and say it's the property deed for your home?
@AlexHollings52 You take some random piece of paper from nowhere and dare to claim it came from the Chinese government? Could I just grab any paper and say it's the property deed for your home?
@pangzikuaikan Even though there wasn't a single Chinese participant in the whole meeting?Smearing China with a dubious paper, this politician overlooks the cost to his country.That's not a decent way to behave
@Dr_M_Davis Even though there wasn't a single Chinese participant in the whole meeting?Smearing China with a dubious paper, this politician overlooks the cost to his country.That's not a decent way to behave
@ASPertierra Even though there wasn't a single Chinese participant in the whole meeting?Smearing China with a dubious paper, this politician overlooks the cost to his country.That's not a decent way to behave