Clydachjack

G33k and Swansea City fan. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 Cwmtawe Comprehensive IT Dep🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿

[Hennie Inglis 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 🇳🇱 💚🤍💜 @HennieInglis]

This is fraud @hmrc @DWPgovuk @PoliceScotland

These men raised over £6k from donations for their "Walk for Heather", saying it was going to Herbert's surgery as it wasn't being done on the NHS

Herbert is up in court next month for his comments about the death of Ann Widdecombe

[Hennie Inglis 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 🇳🇱 💚🤍💜 @HennieInglis]

I am being told by followers MY post 👇 here is being flagged as 'automated' and spam.

No. Its me @x

The polycule and their mates want it shut down because they've taken nearly £8k from people, when Herbert's operation was scheduled and carried out on the NHS.

@support

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

Congratulations! 🥂 🎉👏

[Clydachjack @Swanseajack71]

@NormanBrennan SWP are pretty corrupt, just look at the Clydach murders, we all know it was their own people who did it. Then there were the Cardiff 5, and the brothers in Swansea.

[Paul Thomas @NeathJack1]

Well that's absolutely killed the South Wales Derby atmosphere. Graveyard slot.

[Wales-Women’s Rights Network 💜🤍💚🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 @WRNWales]

BREAKING NEWS: @FAWales has FINALLY capitulated - abandoning the unlawful policies that failed to protect the women's and girls' game.

After years of campaigning and top-level talks to end these failures on safety and fairness, WRNWales has received confirmation from @NoelMooney13 that FAW has taken - with immediate effect -measures to comply with the law.
We're pleased that FAW ultimately took on board our safeguarding concerns and has responded appropriately.
More to follow!
@wsusportsunion @sharrond62 @TracyEdwardsMBE @oliverbrown_tel

https://t.co/egnkEIcNj9

#SaveWomensSport

[Graham Linehan @Glinner]

This is a man pretending to be a woman. He has no qualifications in being a woman. Don't confuse his male entitlement for anything else.

[⚢ Nyssa ANGRYffindyke ⚢ @iowntheterf]

It would be sad if people reported the gofundme for the "toxic kidney".

Litcherally sad. Heartbreaking.

Please refrain from sharing and raising awareness. @gofundme might be forcing him to refund the money to the donors who thought they supported someone health-wise.

[Clydachjack @Swanseajack71]

@MuseumCommodore Trailblazer!

[cavakaggyreborn @cavakaggyreborn]

Fraudulent

[costahammer @costahammer]

@BBCBreaking @streethawk0 Of course it won’t 🙄… a bit like with this guy! … Two tier policing in plain sight 🤔… @metpoliceuk are not even hiding it 🤷‍♂️

[Nigel Farage @Nigel_Farage]

Polanski must face the consequences of his appalling decisions.

He has not even apologised.

[Clydachjack @Swanseajack71]

@WillyWoofter @gofundme @GoFundMeUK Done

[Willy Woofter @WillyWoofter]

Scat fetishist and boyfriend of scat fetishist and celebrator of Ann Widdecombe's mvrder, Euan Sprinkles and Herbert Heather, have admitted they grifted money and will now use it for other unmentioned things. Get reporting this to @gofundme @GoFundMeUK

https://t.co/AvvTkZj38R

[Just Jayne♀️(Finch) @canthelpmenow7]

And there it is. Money raised but not used for the purpose it was claimed it would be

[cavakaggyreborn @cavakaggyreborn]

@Safety
Account: @cavakaggyreborn (ID 1794806800467820544)
I am requesting an urgent manual review of the adult-content label currently applied to my account and the associated suspension/removal from Creator Revenue Sharing.
Key facts:
I have never posted adult, sexually explicit, graphic violence, or gore content. My posts include political opinions, cat videos, and general commentary. Even recent cat posts have been restricted under the adult-content label.
Followers and others are messaging me that they cannot see my posts. Visibility is severely limited.
This label and revenue restriction appear to be the direct result of sustained, coordinated mass-reporting and targeted harassment by the following accounts (and associated activity):
@TristanGinger (ID 485371560)
@tristanginger66 (ID 1590593060345454592)
@GingerTris62927 (ID 1967595096519421952)
Documented public calls for mass reporting and ongoing targeting (examples):
15–18 Nov 2024 (@TristanGinger): Multiple posts urging people to report the account, including “Let’s see if we can get this account of your’s banned too” and “please keep reporting @cavakaggyreborn”.
24 Jan 2025 (@TristanGinger): Explicit instructions — “Please keep reporting @cavakaggyreborn and do so by going through her replies. We got her first account shut…” and “Please keep reporting the account—even if her Twitter is locked down, you can still report the account itself… Sever it.”
15 Apr 2026 (@tristanginger66): “Karen Evans aka @cavakaggyreborn… I call on everyone to report her account, and that the account be permanently removed from this platform.” Followed by “You can report this one. Go through her replies.”
Ongoing 2025–2026 posts from both main accounts: repeated public naming of the account as a “hate account,” monitoring of alleged lockouts/suppression/monetization status, claims about alts, and framing of reporting as legitimate action against the account.
This pattern spans more than 20 months and includes direct encouragement of mass reporting, instructions on how to report even locked accounts, and continuous public targeting.
I have requested manual review multiple times and received only automated responses. I am a Premium subscriber and have not violated X’s terms regarding adult content, graphic violence, or any other policy that would justify the current label or revenue removal.
Please escalate this for a full human review of:
The adult-content label and any associated restrictions.
Visibility/searchability of my posts.
Creator Revenue Sharing eligibility.
Whether coordinated mass-reporting activity from the accounts listed above has contributed to these automated actions.
I am happy to provide additional post IDs, screenshots of the label, or further details. Thank you for your attention.
@nikitabier @elonmusk @premium

[Wings Over Scotland @WingsScotland]

This is plain and simple criminal embezzlement. Having obtained money for a specific purpose, for which it was subsequently not required - even if it was raised in good faith at the time - your only option is to return it to donors. It is not yours to dispose of as you see fit.

[Stuart Macintosh @stueymaco]

So not privately, then? What’s happening with the nearly £8k in the fundraiser? Paying for solicitors?

[Stuart Macintosh @stueymaco]

Nothing more endearing than an English benefit claimant, despite being told not to by every woman in the land and the Supreme Court, continuing to use female spaces to feed his perverted fetish.

[James Dreyfus @DreyfusJames]

Helen certainly not putting up with Morris’s silly, tired lazy little games…

Brava, Helen…💪🏻❤️