ˢʷⁱᵗᶜʰ-₉₀₀🟧

Building fully on-chain Bitcoin BApps.
Ordinals infra, inscription tooling, three.js indie gamedev.
DMs open happy to help builders.

[ˢʷⁱᵗᶜʰ-₉₀₀🟧 @Switch_900]

99% of you are missing out on Ørdainls: searching Ørdainls is a game-changer
Being able to search ordainls can save you hours every day
Imagine having instant access to ordainls at your fingertips
Can someone explain why searching ordainls wasn't available sooner? Remember its a Ø > Zero!

[ˢʷⁱᵗᶜʰ-₉₀₀🟧 @Switch_900]

@_CRFTD_ @itchatoshi There are some things. Thay need working on, it is a large code base. There is an already inscribed version but this one is a bit better. You can use a bitmap to sign up with a social profile.

[ˢʷⁱᵗᶜʰ-₉₀₀🟧 @Switch_900]

@_CRFTD_ @itchatoshi https://t.co/uJF3NuyRqW

[ˢʷⁱᵗᶜʰ-₉₀₀🟧 @Switch_900]

@Mauricio_FPD @code @Copilot @NousResearch Is this as powerful as Claude?

[ˢʷⁱᵗᶜʰ-₉₀₀🟧 @Switch_900]

What’s next for coding with AI?

@code and @Copilot prices keep creeping up, and it feels like every tool is turning into another monthly tax.

So what’s the real alternative?

What are you using right now?
How often do you actually use it?
Does it have Claude Opus 4.8 or something close?
And most importantly, how much are you spending each month?

Trying to work out what’s actually worth paying for.

[bitoshi blockamoto 🧱 BITMAP 🟧 @blockamoto]

Thank you from the bottom of my heart for three years of Bitmap. 🧡

And for keeping the spirit alive. ✨

What a journey it has been! 🟧

And here's to many more. 🥂

[ˢʷⁱᵗᶜʰ-₉₀₀🟧 @Switch_900]

@3dOrdinalClub @blockamoto @oodinals

[ˢʷⁱᵗᶜʰ-₉₀₀🟧 @Switch_900]

Yeah I get what you are saying.

If people cannot afford to touch L1, then they are not really holding Bitcoin. They are holding someone else’s promise.

That is a real problem.

And I agree, if the only people who can afford UTXOs are BlackRock, exchanges, banks and large funds, then Bitcoin risks becoming something normal people can only access through IOUs.

That is not the future I want either.

But this is also why I think things like OODL matter.

I am not saying OODL fixes world scale Bitcoin.

I am saying if blockspace is limited and expensive, then every transaction needs to do more.

A normal transaction just moves something.

An OODL transaction can move the asset, hold the sale logic, prove the ownership path, carry the listing, and make the future sale discoverable from Bitcoin itself.

That means less reliance on marketplaces, less reliance on databases, and more ownership sitting with the actual user.

For me, the answer is not everyone using L1 every day.

And it is definitely not everyone being trapped in custodial IOUs forever.

The answer has to be smarter use of Bitcoin.

Better wallets.
Better batching.
Better protocols.
Better exits.
Better use of each UTXO.
Better ways to make one transaction carry more value.

So yes, I agree with your concern.

Bitcoin being auditable by everyone but usable by almost no one would be a massive problem.

I just think the way forward is not to stop building on Bitcoin.

It is to build in a way that makes every onchain action more useful.

That is the bit I am trying to explore with OODL.

[ˢʷⁱᵗᶜʰ-₉₀₀🟧 @Switch_900]

I cancelled my @hellmoneypod sub today.

It says 'Bitcoin & Ordinals podcast, but I expected more focus on Ordinals, tech, recursion, protocols, and actual builders moving the space forward.

Instead, it often feels like Ordinals gets reduced to popularity contests and taste making.

@rodarmor Casey is now being pushed as one of the suggested crypto accounts on X, which makes this even more important. If you have that level of visibility, why are so few Ordinals builders being amplified?

Lifo is great, but there are many builders in this space doing serious work who are being ignored and also alienated.

Ordinals is not just static art storage. It is not just 2023 hype. It is a protocol with massive possibilities.
So Casey, are you actually interested in exploring what Ordinals can become or are you happy sitting on the beauty pageant soapbox?

[ˢʷⁱᵗᶜʰ-₉₀₀🟧 @Switch_900]

@joubalspacker @TheBCHPodcast @hellmoneypod @bitjson Bitcoin is a luxury chain. I am not one to believe it even needs to get world wide adoption or everyday use. I also dont think it is a good use as store of value without people like the inscribers generating network fees.

[ˢʷⁱᵗᶜʰ-₉₀₀🟧 @Switch_900]

We can inscribe a Hermes Agent capsule into a Bitmap: prompts, skills, docs, config, project manifest, task list, source links, hashes and child inscriptions.

The Bitmap becomes the on-chain project root workspace.

The Hermes agent itself would still run off-chain on a VPS or local machine, because it needs runtime access, models, tools, memory and execution.

But technically it would not be Hermes fully running inside Bitcoin but a Bitmap controlled Hermes build environment where the Bitmap stores the instructions, state and outputs onchain.

I think this is the best use case. Whats ya thoughts?

[ˢʷⁱᵗᶜʰ-₉₀₀🟧 @Switch_900]

Assisted inscribing, inscribe anywhere, anyway using mobile or pc. Keep it simple or make it advanced. Do it your way, that's the oodl way!

[ˢʷⁱᵗᶜʰ-₉₀₀🟧 @Switch_900]

@Mauricio_FPD @NousResearch @blockamoto I did look at this when I heard that it was what you wanted to do. Technical it can not all be onchain but yes lets jump on a call and we can play it out.

[ˢʷⁱᵗᶜʰ-₉₀₀🟧 @Switch_900]

That is exactly the point I’m trying to solve with OODL.
I dont think BTC needs to become a world scale database where every tiny action happens directly onchain.

In a high fee environment, base layer Bitcoin becomes settlement, proof, provenance and final ownership.

OODL is designed around that idea.

The important transaction is the one that defines the asset, the sale logic, the ownership path, or the future spend condition. Not every click, message, offer or interaction needs to be a new L1 transaction.

So for me the goal is:

BTC remains auditable.
BTC remains hard money.
BTC remains the final settlement layer.

But the user experience can be built around smarter transactions, recursive data, wallets, indexers, caching, batching, Lightning payment rails and protocols like OODL that make each on-chain action do more.

So I agree with your fatal flaw.

If everyone needs to touch L1 constantly, almost nobody can use it.

But if L1 is used for high value final state and everything around it is designed properly, then BTC can still scale in usefulness without sacrificing auditability.

[ˢʷⁱᵗᶜʰ-₉₀₀🟧 @Switch_900]

Yeah i get what you mean. I am greatful to the few who pick up and use the things i build. Have you seen what I done on BTC with OODL. It adds new function to BTC as you can create intent of a sale. For instance you take an inscription send that inscription back to yourself and within the transaction embedded a PSBT that allows anyone to pay and receive the inscriptionif they pay the cost. I am also using this to create a P2P exchange. Imo BTC has everything needed. More details here. https://t.co/WGdfy2lIN4

[ˢʷⁱᵗᶜʰ-₉₀₀🟧 @Switch_900]

You seem to have the same problem. Screaming in to the void. My issue isnt the tech it is that there just isnt the attention it deserves. 187 view on a video that is 1 year old is about the same amount of traction I get. BCH seems like an even bigger curve, atleast most people actually accept bitcoin and not having to explain well it is like bitcoin but different and worth 20x less and has 100x less follong and users. Thank you for the links though I will spend the time to dive in properly and take a good look at the tech.

[ˢʷⁱᵗᶜʰ-₉₀₀🟧 @Switch_900]

I just watched a bunch of videos. All the 'problems' BCH solves are not real problems. Some of the 'problems' are are actually the solution to bigger problems. I have no issues with how BTC or ordinals are, i think they work great. The problem is not the tech it is the people. Many people come for the ponzi, the get rich quick however bitcoin, ordinals and OODL don't need to be about a quick flip I believe bitcoin could provide the foundation to true Web3 decentralised Internet. I have built an on-chain social layer that could replace X and discord all decentralised and P2P i guess my real point to make is that we are already building some intresting stuff and the few builders left in this space feel alienated form the even fewer who gain any traction on socials. There is a reason why real builders accounts are suppressed and that's all to do with X who want drama and anything of any substance is pushed behind the soap opera.

[ˢʷⁱᵗᶜʰ-₉₀₀🟧 @Switch_900]

@TheBCHPodcast @hellmoneypod @ParyonUSD @CauldronSwap @BCH_Guru @BCH_BULL @SeleneWallet @XO_bitcoincash @bchbliss Thank you, i will take a look. Is there any gaming happening? Are there users or is it pretty dead?

[ˢʷⁱᵗᶜʰ-₉₀₀🟧 @Switch_900]

@TheBCHPodcast @hellmoneypod Can you show me the most advanced tech on BCH, like is there a killer app that someone has built? I keep meaning to spend some time exploring i just haven't had the time yet. I am not a shit coiner or token generator.

[ˢʷⁱᵗᶜʰ-₉₀₀🟧 @Switch_900]

@TheBCHPodcast @hellmoneypod https://t.co/TDkkoRyT5b

[ˢʷⁱᵗᶜʰ-₉₀₀🟧 @Switch_900]

@HausHoppe @hellmoneypod It is a shame that even those who have the ability to lift the eco system up decided not to do so. We are on our own out here.

[ˢʷⁱᵗᶜʰ-₉₀₀🟧 @Switch_900]

If you create. Ore then one inscription you get the secret menu.

Chain mode!