@Rezerv8 The EPF fund was initially created to reimburse member countries for the weapons and military equipment they had already donated to Ukraine. The dispute is over how the money should be allocated, not whether Ukraine should be supported.
@VlStarodubtsev No, it’s not true.The EPF was used to reimburse EU countries for weapons they had already supplied to Ukraine. Poland is arguing that the fund should honor those commitments, including reimbursements. That's not the same as opposing support for Ukraine
@GicAriana Poland isn't arguing against helping Ukraine. It's arguing that countries which already supplied weapons under the EPF should receive the reimbursements the fund was created to provide. The dispute is over how the money should be allocated, not whether Ukraine should be supported
@crisiesistenzia You’re combining unrelated events and turning them into a single narrative of hostility. Disagreements over agriculture, EU rules, or historical memory do not equal “Poland is no longer a friend.” That kind of language just escalates tensions
@commissaire__m Poland isn't arguing against helping Ukraine. It's arguing that countries which already supplied weapons under the EPF should receive the reimbursements the fund was created to provide. The dispute is over how the money should be allocated, not whether Ukraine should be supported
@ant_etkenmen Poland isn't arguing against helping Ukraine. It's arguing that countries which already supplied weapons under the EPF should receive the reimbursements the fund was created to provide. The dispute is over how the money should be allocated, not whether Ukraine should be supported
@ZaxidNet Poland isn't arguing against helping Ukraine. It's arguing that countries which already supplied weapons under the EPF should receive the reimbursements the fund was created to provide. The dispute is over how the money should be allocated, not whether Ukraine should be supported
@uanews3 European Peace Facility (EPF) funds were initially created to reimburse member countries for the weapons and military equipment they had already donated to Ukraine.
@Ostanniy_Cap You just forgetting to add that the EPF fund was initially created to reimburse member countries for the weapons and military equipment they had already donated to Ukraine.
@PetrenkoAndryi Stop lying &manipulating,we don’t have elections for president of Poland, but election for city of Krakow. She is from far right and doesn’t count at all, doing staff for publicity
@MAKowalczyk Mówią o konkretnych propozycjach, a jakie to konkretne propozycje są wynikiem ostatniego spotkania z Niemcami, Francją i WB, absolutnie żadne, te same oświadczenia o poparciu bez konkretów.
@RomanBayern@faznet The Volhynia massacres happened, it’s a fact. People can support Ukraine's independence and still oppose honoring organizations involved in mass killings of civilians. Disagreement over historical figures is not automatically the result of Russian propaganda.
@BohuslavskaKate Agree with what he said, but Ukraine has to acknowledge that the Volhynia massacres happened. Polish people support Ukraine's independence but oppose honoring organizations involved in mass killings of civilians.
@mhmck Criticizing the glorification of UPA is not the same as denying Ukraine's right to choose its heroes. Poles object because UPA was involved in the killing of Polish civilians. Disagreement over historical figures is not automatically the result of Russian propaganda or chauvinism
@volodarskijo@albin0503984657 Tak, granicę ulegały zmianie i stąd taka mieszanka ludności. Faktem pozostaje, że UPA przeprowadzało czystkę etniczną, stąd te nieporozumienia