Tam Boag

I 💙 Guinness. Don't follow me to sell me anything!!!

[Tam Boag @TamBoag62]

@Dani_murphy92 Looking for 4 Floor outer ringside please.

[יאיר לפיד - Yair Lapid @yairlapid]

UN Secretary-General António Guterres said: “I have never seen killing and destruction like Gaza in all my years as Secretary-General.”

According to even the most critical reports, Guterres, 70,000 people were killed in the war in Gaza, a large proportion of them Hamas terrorists.

During your years as Secretary-General: more than 600,000 people were massacred or starved to death in Ethiopia.

377,000 died in Yemen — that figure appears in reports issued by your own organization.

150,000 were killed in Sudan and 12 million were displaced.

Hundreds of thousands have been buried in Ukraine.

You didn’t see it? They died before your eyes. You simply looked the other way, because the Jews couldn’t be blamed.

[Robbie @Robbie_Reasons]

It is just that simple.

[Ben Graham @BenGrahamUK]

This is incredibly dangerous rhetoric from the Home Secretary.

Shabana Mahmood is publicly threatening the “full force of the law” against Danny Tommo before the planned Piddington protest has even taken place.

Whatever your opinion of Danny Tommo, Britain has laws for a reason. You cannot punish someone simply because you disagree with their viewpoints.

If he or anyone else commits a crime, investigate it and prosecute accordingly.

But a Home Secretary singling out an individual in advance and using language like this sets a deeply worrying precedent.

The law must be applied equally, not politically.

[Willis Eschenbach @WEschenbach]

Tweet of the morning.

w.

[🇬🇧 Rachel @RachelD1892]

Dec '25 to July '26, Angela Rayner received £150,000 from 'Refrigeration House Ltd' for 'staffing costs'.
The July 2026 accounts show:
- zero staff
- £62,733 net assets
A company with no employees make a huge political donation exceeding it's assets to Rayner?
Does it add up!?

[Mel Gibson⭐ @MelGibsonxvyv]

🇪🇺⚡️🇫🇷 | Over the past 24 hours, tens of thousands of patriots on social media have shared posts claiming that Ursula von der Leyen has destroyed Europe !!

🟥💬Do you agree with them?

[Christian @InTheTrenchesUK]

LET ME INTRODUCE YOU TO TAHIR ALI

Let me introduce you to the man sitting in the British Parliament right now, drawing a British salary, operating under a British party whip, enjoying the protection of British law, and using every single one of those privileges to serve causes that have nothing to do with Britain.

His name is Tahir Ali. He is the Labour Member of Parliament for Birmingham Hall Green and Moseley. And if you have never heard of him, that is precisely the problem. Because the things this man has said, the votes he has cast, the foreign governments that have bankrolled his travel, and the causes he has championed from inside the House of Commons, belong in a counter-intelligence file. Not on a parliamentary payroll.

This is not a rumour. This is not a smear. This is a documented, verifiable, public-record account of one man's seven-year career of advancing foreign and Islamist interests from inside the legislature of England.

Read every word.

THE QATAR CONNECTION

Let us start with the money.

In September 2023, Tahir Ali flew to Qatar on a trip funded entirely by the Qatar Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Not a private donor. Not a charity. The actual ministry of a foreign government. A foreign government that the United States Treasury, the European Union, and multiple intelligence services have identified as the primary financial backer of Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood globally.

Qatar paid for his flights. Qatar paid for his hotel. Qatar paid for his food. Qatar even paid for a family member to accompany him. The total bill that Qatar's government picked up for this British MP and his guest came to £8,972. Every penny of it is recorded in the Register of Members Financial Interests.

What did Tahir Ali do in Qatar? What meetings did he attend? Who did he sit across the table from? What was discussed? The public itinerary does not say. The Foreign Influence Registration Scheme, if it had any teeth, would compel him to answer. It does not. So he filed the trip, pocketed the hospitality, and returned to Birmingham.

He also took a separate trip to Islamabad and Kashmir in the same period, with a family member, funded by a different donor, valued at £1,800. More foreign travel. More foreign money. More blank space where the meeting details should be.

THE FOREIGN NETWORK INSIDE PARLIAMENT

Tahir Ali does not just travel to foreign countries on foreign money. He organises foreign influence inside Parliament as a formal function of his role.

He chairs the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Turkey. He chairs the APPG on Jordan. He sits on the APPGs for Kashmir, Palestine, Pakistan, and Bangladesh. That is six foreign nation interest groups that this Birmingham MP either leads or participates in as a formal parliamentary officer.

Six. Not one. Six.

When does he chair an All-Party Parliamentary Group on Birmingham? On the West Midlands? On the industrial decline that has gutted the communities he was elected to represent? He does not. Because that is not where his interests lie.

His interests lie in Ankara, in Doha, in Islamabad, in Amman. His interests lie in the states and causes of the Muslim world, and he uses his seat in the British Parliament as the mechanism for advancing them.

THE VOTE THAT TELLS YOU EVERYTHING

On 2 July 2025, the House of Commons voted on whether to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation under the Terrorism Act 2000. Palestine Action is a group whose members have climbed onto arms factory rooftops, smashed machinery, and caused millions in criminal damage.

The vote was 385 to 26 in favour of proscription.

Tahir Ali was one of the 26.

He voted to keep Palestine Action off the terrorist list. He stood with a tiny rump of radicals against the overwhelming consensus of Parliament, against the Home Secretary, against the security services' assessment, against the law. He voted no.

In the same division, the proscription order covered two other groups: the Maniacs Murder Cult, a neo-Nazi organisation, and the Russian Imperial Movement, a white supremacist paramilitary group. All three were proscribed in the same motion. Tahir Ali voted against proscribing all of them, because voting against Palestine Action's proscription meant voting no on the whole order.

That is his judgment. That is his priority. That is the call he made when put to the test.

"MILITARY ACTION AGAINST ISRAEL"

On 14 September 2026, inside the House of Commons, Tahir Ali called for Britain to take military action against Israel. He demanded that Israel be disarmed. He made these statements from the floor of the Parliament of England.

He was not speaking at a protest. He was not posting on social media at 2 in the morning. He was standing in the chamber of the House of Commons, as a duly elected MP, funded by British taxpayers, calling for the British military to be deployed against a democratic state.

The backlash was instant. Within hours he was on X posting an apology, saying he had "wrongly given the impression" that he supported military force against Israel and that he "apologised unreservedly."

But the words were said. In Parliament. On the record. In Hansard. They do not disappear because a grovelling tweet followed them.

And it was not even the first time. The Jewish Chronicle reported that it was not the first occasion Ali had raised the prospect of British military intervention against Israel. This is a pattern. The call comes. The outrage comes. The apology comes. And then it happens again.

BLASPHEMY LAWS. IN ENGLAND.

In November 2024, during Prime Minister's Questions, Tahir Ali stood up and asked Keir Starmer to "commit to introducing measures to prohibit the desecration of all religious texts and the prophets of the Abrahamic religions."

He prefaced the question by citing Islamophobia Awareness Month. He cited a United Nations Human Rights Council resolution condemning desecration of the Koran.

He was asking for blasphemy law. In England. In 2024.

England abolished its blasphemy laws in 2008. Those laws had been dead for sixteen years when Tahir Ali stood up in the Commons and asked the Prime Minister to bring them back. Dressed up in ecumenical language about "all Abrahamic faiths," the request was, as The Independent noted, transparently about protecting one religion and one set of prophets from criticism.

This is the logic of Pakistan's blasphemy statutes, which carry a death penalty and are used to persecute Christians, Ahmadis, and anyone who questions the dominant religious order. Tahir Ali walked into the British Parliament and argued for the same principle.

And Keir Starmer did not reject it. He did not laugh it out of the room. He simply failed to commit to it, which is a different thing entirely.

BIRMINGHAM IS DROWNING IN RUBBISH. HE IS BUSY WITH KASHMIR.

In March 2025, with Birmingham City Council effectively bankrupt and a refuse collection strike leaving the city buried in uncollected waste, Tahir Ali signed a letter addressed to the Prime Minister of Pakistan. The letter called on Pakistan to build a new international airport in Mirpur, Azad Kashmir, to save travel time for British visitors.

He was one of twenty MPs who signed this letter. Twenty British MPs writing to the leader of a foreign government to build an airport in a foreign territory, approximately four thousand miles from the United Kingdom.

GB News commentator Alex Armstrong said of Ali: "This is a Labour MP who is so out of touch he is practically on another continent already."

The Guardian's Kenan Malik observed that Ali had never once voted in Parliament on welfare reform or benefits cuts, issues that devastate the poorest people in his constituency, but had found time to campaign for a Pakistani airport and for blasphemy law.

His constituents are living in rubbish-strewn streets. He is writing to the Pakistani government about airport infrastructure in Azad Kashmir.

THE ANTISEMITISM. THE COVID BREACH. THE RECORD.

This is not new behaviour. It has been consistent since the day he arrived in Parliament.

In December 2019, before he had even been formally sworn in, Ali stood at an election hustings and conflated the Barclay Brothers, the Conservative press proprietors, with Lehman Brothers, the collapsed American investment bank associated in popular antisemitic conspiracy theory with Jewish financial power. The Community Security Trust logged it as a hate incident. Police received a formal complaint from a senior member of Birmingham's Jewish community.

He was not yet formally an MP. He had just been elected. The antisemitism came before he even crossed the threshold of Westminster.

In April 2020, during the first national COVID lockdown, when the government was telling the country that attending funerals was restricted to immediate household members, Tahir Ali attended a funeral in breach of those restrictions. He was photographed at the event. He apologised.

His company, Tahir Ali Campaigns Ltd, incorporated in June 2024, right before the General Election, has its registered address at a virtual office in Covent Garden. He is its sole director.

THE SHAPE OF IT

Look at the shape of what is documented here. Not speculation. Not inference. Documented, public-record, registered-interest, Hansard-confirmed fact.

A man who received nearly nine thousand pounds in travel and hospitality from a foreign government directly connected to Hamas. A man who chairs parliamentary groups for Turkey, Jordan and sits on groups for Pakistan, Kashmir, Palestine and Bangladesh, and has apparently never found time to chair one for Birmingham. A man who was one of only 26 MPs in a 411-member chamber to vote against labelling Palestine Action terrorists. A man who stood in the Commons and called for Britain to take military action against a democratic state. A man who asked a British Prime Minister to introduce blasphemy law. A man who campaigned for a Pakistani airport while his own city drowned in uncollected rubbish. A man with an antisemitism incident on his record before he had served a single day in office.

The question is not whether Tahir Ali has foreign sympathies. His own Register of Members Interests, his own Hansard record, his own voting history, his own tweets establish that beyond any serious argument.

The question is why the British state has done nothing about it.

The Foreign Influence Registration Scheme exists. Use it. The Intelligence and Security Committee has oversight powers. Use them. The Committee on Standards has the authority to investigate conduct. Use it. Lahore does not elect Members of Parliament. Ankara does not elect Members of Parliament. Doha most certainly does not elect Members of Parliament.

Birmingham does. And the people of Birmingham Hall Green and Moseley deserve a Member of Parliament whose primary loyalty is to them. To England. To the country whose laws protect him, whose taxpayers pay him, and whose Parliament he stands in.

Tahir Ali is not that man.

The evidence is in the public record. It has always been there. The question is whether anyone in this country still has the courage to read it, say it out loud, and do something about it.

All facts cited are drawn from the Register of Members Financial Interests, Hansard parliamentary records, Companies House (number 15780408), and contemporaneous reporting by The Jewish Chronicle, The Independent, The New Statesman, The Spectator, Israel Hayom, GB News, and The Guardian. Claims about Qatar's relationships with Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood reflect the documented assessments of the US Treasury, Foreign Policy, The Atlantic, and the Counter Extremism Project.

[Hans-Georg Maaßen @HGMaassen]

Ui, das ist heftig!

Die griechische Europaabgeordnete MdEP Aphroditi Latinopoulou ging auf die „Verdienste“ von v. d. Leyen ein.

„Frau von der Leyen, es gibt keine größere Rassistin gegenüber Europäern als Sie, und dafür gibt es Beweise.

Sie haben uns mit illegalen Migranten überschwemmt, uns mit Steuern und Bürokratie erdrückt. Sie haben unsere Landwirte, Viehzüchter und Fischer ruiniert. Sie schließen europäische Fabriken, und Hunderttausende von Arbeitsplätzen gehen verloren.

Sie haben die traditionelle Familie zerstört. Sie zwingen uns die „Woke“-Agenda, den grünen Wahnsinn und die Islamisierung Europas auf. Auf unsere Kosten versorgen Sie Millionen illegaler Migranten, die unsere Stadtteile zerstören, plündern, belästigen, morden – und am Ende stellen Sie ihnen sogar Ausweise aus, damit sie wählen können.

Dafür haben Sie uns aber Papierstrohhalme, festgeklebte Verschlusskappen und Gay-Prides beschert.

Sie sind nicht nur Merkels beste Schülerin. Sie haben sie übertroffen, Frau von der Leyen. Sie stecken tief in Skandalen und Korruptionsvorwürfen: PfizerGate, verschwundene Nachrichten und die Verweigerung von Kontrollen.

Und all das – ohne die Zustimmung der europäischen Bürger.“

[H.C.Hendrix @HCHendrix1]

@sharrond62 Here's the answer.

[Make Europe Great Again - M.E.G.A @ScaryEurope]

🚨⚡️BREAKING: Sadiq Khan personally READ reports on young girls gang-raped in London hotels by Muslims plied with drugs, threatened & abused.
YET on multiple occasions, he publicly denied grooming gangs exist in the capital.

YOU MUST RESIGN ‼️

[Mossad Customer Support @LionOfJudahX]

Yemeni man destroys the UN in 90 seconds 🔥
UN Human Rights Chief: “Nothing justifies how Israel fights in Gaza…”
Then a Yemeni takes the mic:
“I ask the UN, the Arab League, and everyone waving the Palestinian flag since October 7…
Where is the flag of Yemen?
Half a million dead. Biggest famine in modern history.
Silence.

Where is the flag of Sudan?
150,000 killed in less than two years.
Silence.

Where is the flag of Syria?
Half a million dead.
Silence.
Why is it that when Arabs kill millions of Arabs… no one bats an eye?

The Houthis spend millions firing missiles at Israel instead of feeding their own starving people.

Your report mentions Israel 188 times.
Iran? Zero.
And Qatar sits here on the Human Rights Council… while hosting Hamas leaders in luxury hotels.”

The room went quiet.

This is the real face of UN hypocrisy.
#AmYisraelChai #StandWithIsrael

[Tam Boag @TamBoag62]

@TheBritLad 🇬🇧

[Sharron Davies HoL MBE @sharrond62]

Women who give birth are not ‘birthing people, or chest feeders’ it’s so bloody insulting. No child has ever, in the whole history of time been born from a man. Stop removing our words for a tiny minority who pretend biology is irrelevant. The utterly frustrating thing is this does not go both way when talking about prostates or erectial dysfunction problems.. men don’t get called penis or prostate owners! 😡 It’s why it’s so obviously a men’s rights movement. It’s just women who are supposed to give up opportunities (sports/awards/places) & our descriptive words. Nothing changes. And stupid handmaidens cheer this new erasure along.

[The British Patriot @TheBritLad]

🚨EXPOSED: Everyone meet Ed Davey (@EdwardJDavey) — current Lib Dem leader. (British political party)

From 2010 to 2012 he was the minister in charge of the Post Office.

The Post Office’s computer system was faulty. It wrongly showed money missing from local branches. Hundreds of innocent people who ran those Post Offices were accused of stealing, lost their businesses, went to court, and went to prison.

Alan Bates, who fought for them, asked Davey for a meeting in 2010. Davey said no ..it “would serve no useful purpose.”

At least 13 people later took their own lives because of what happened. Davey now says Post Office bosses lied to him.

The people whose lives were ruined say he should have done more.

Years later Davey was paid hundreds of thousands of pounds as a consultant by the law firm that then fought the Post Office’s victims in court.

Please don’t repost this, he doesn’t want anyone to know.

[Ben Graham @BenGrahamUK]

Meanwhile Labour…

Angela Rayner: tax scandal

Louise Haigh: fraud conviction

Mike Amesbury: assault conviction

Rachel Reeves: rental licence breach

Peter Mandelson: Epstein links

Tulip Siddiq: corruption conviction

Rushanara Ali: tenant rent scandal

Lucy Powell: rape gangs remarks

Jonathan Reynolds: fake solicitor claim

Jas Athwal: slum landlord scandal

Andrew Gwynne: WhatsApp scandal

Dan Norris: sexual offence allegations

But apparently Nigel Farage is the scandal.

The selective outrage is laughable.

[Richard Dawkins @RichardDawkins]

I am bewildered, and not very impressed, by the visceral, naked, irrational hatred spat out by some defenders of Jason Arday. If a Cambridge professor is accused of being an unqualified charlatan, the accusation might be racially motivated. On the other hand it might not, depending on the evidence. The correct question to ask is not, ”What is the colour of his skin” but “Is it in fact true that he is an unqualified charlatan?” Please examine the evidence before leaping to the assumption of racism.
As for the idea that journalists “piled in on him” and “hounded him to his death”, most attacks were against Cambridge University. Jason himself was widely regarded as an unfortunate victim of foolish promotion way beyond his ability to cope. In appointing him to a professorship for which he was manifestly unqualified – in ludicrously describing him as “the best in the world” – certain senior members of the university showed a level of patronising condescension towards black people that could fairly be described as racism, while at the same time making him tragically vulnerable to such attacks as came his way.

[TERFs ‘r’ us ©️ @Terfs_R]

Anne Widdecombe - Brutally murdered in her home.
🔴 The left: «She had it coming! She had the wrong opinions!»

Charlie Kirk - Assassinated as he was on stage.
🔴 The left: «Let’s celebrate! He had the wrong opinions!»

Jason Arday - Committed suicide after he was exposed as a plagiarist and perpetual fraud.
🔴 The left: «He was lynched!»

And you wonder why we don’t believe in mainstream media anymore?

[Win C @UKScotBrit]

The SNP lost at the Supreme Court.

They lost again on prisons.

So now they’re going to rewrite the law itself to suit their own agenda.

Having been told, twice, that sex means biological sex, they are preparing a new “Human Rights Bill” designed to force public bodies to prioritise gender identity over the Supreme Court’s ruling.

This isn’t expanding rights. It’s a calculated attempt to legislate their way around a judgment they refuse to accept, so they can keep putting men who claim to be women into women’s spaces, prisons and services.

They change the law when the law doesn’t give them what they want.

Women have already been thrown under the bus enough times for this ideology.

For you @JohnSwinney, why can’t you just accept the law and biological reality?

In basic biology, sex is defined by the type of gamete an organism is organised to produce: females produce large gametes (ova/eggs), males produce small gametes (sperm).

In humans this is fixed at conception by chromosomes (XX or XY) and is binary and unchangeable.

For some unknown reason, you are unwilling to accept that FACT.

No amount of legislation, feelings or political will alters that.

[Restore The Empire @empire_res66190]

MP Zarah Sultana wants this clip deleted from the internet.

Here she is calling for violence on our streets. Why hasn't she been arrested?

[𝔾𝕣𝕚𝕗𝕥𝕪 @TheGNPE]

- NEWS - Queen Elizabeth II's former chaplain accuses King Charles of violating oath and deserting Christians

Gavin Ashenden who served as royal chaplain for nine years said the King has turned his back on his Coronation oath after he said:

“I have always thought of Britain as a ‘community of communities’. That has led me to understand that the Sovereign has an additional duty – less formally recognised but to be no less diligently discharged.
It is the duty to protect the diversity of our country, including by protecting the space for Faith itself and its practise through the religions, cultures, traditions and beliefs to which our hearts and minds direct us as individuals.”

Ashenden departed his role after criticising a church service in which a Muslim student had been invited to recite from the Koran.

He hit out at the King's actions in stark terms, stating that Charles "has deserted Christian allegiance, turned his back on his Coronation oath [and] repudiated the support and promotion of a Christian culture."

The former chaplain went further, noting: "Some are asking whether his behaviour is sufficiently subversive as to raise questions about his capacity to fulfil the office of King."

is he right?