Tango

[Tango @Tango_special]

@nazirbrahui1 Funny enough the minister of nader shah called mohabat khan and abdullah khan as Baloch (written between 1747-1753)

I hope you got your answer now 😄

[Tango @Tango_special]

You have lost your mind and are making up things that our prophet (peace be upon him) never did.

Brahui originally first was labelled in 16/17th century. Before it was called Kurdgali, this is common knowledge. Stop making a remix of history

[Nazir Shakir Brahui @nazirbrahui1]

@Tango_special @fahad_kahut The term “Brahui” has been referred to by speakers of different languages in different periods as Varakoi, Parkonoi, and Brahui. The Prophet Muhammad used the term “Brahui.” This is recorded in a 600 CE, which is about a thousand years earlier than your period.

[Tango @Tango_special]

@KillerG46702 Yh defo not. He sounds extremely retarded

[Tango @Tango_special]

@fahad_kahut @nazirbrahui1 “You are right” seems like the only duffer is you 😂

[Tango @Tango_special]

@fahad_kahut @nazirbrahui1 Also your not schooling anyone. You just made yourself look like an idiot and hiding your shame by blocking people who refute your stupid claim 😂

[Tango @Tango_special]

@fahad_kahut @Gwahram99 Here is a brahui sample. All its closest population are baloch + iranic groups. Nothing Dravidian.

Also shows brahuis/baloch genetically clustering together. Which in Punjab even certain castes don’t cluster together like that 😂 so when you ready to split Punjab into 6 qawms?

[Tango @Tango_special]

@nazirbrahui1 @fahad_kahut Why does in Alam-Ara-ye Naderi written in 1747-1753 mention Mohabbat Khan and Abdullah Khan as "chiefs of Balochistan" and calls Mohabbat Khan "son of Abdullah khan BALOCH." ?

[Tango @Tango_special]

@nazirbrahui1 @fahad_kahut So why was nasir khan in 1750 called “Nasir Khan Baloch” and why was he labelled as “mulk e Baloch” and “ruler of Balochistan” ?

This is written in 1750 Ahmed shah abdalis book which he ordered to write

[Tango @Tango_special]

@Gwahram99 @fahad_kahut Typical from these lot

[Tango @Tango_special]

@fahad_kahut @Gwahram99 Go and fool someone else. Baloch and Brahui are identical in autosomal and Y-chromosomal profiles, proof is in the pudding.

Brahui/Baloch cluster the same unlike Punjabi castes. So now you admit Punjab should be split into six different ethnicities according to you

[Tango @Tango_special]

@fahad_kahut @Gwahram99 How can you deny it when the proof is literally in the pudding? He showed your proof that Baloch and Brahui are identical in autosomal and Y-chromosomal profiles

Learn difference between genetics and linguistics and also please stop using AI to make your replies 😂

[Tango @Tango_special]

@fahad_kahut @Gwahram99 @murs_Kandhar Relying on British books who have gotten tribes/ethnicties mixed up many times

Since the start of khan e kalat all khans called themselves baloch. In Ahmed shah abdalis book written 1750s. Nasir khan was called “nasir khan e Baloch” “ruler of Balochistan” and “mulk e Baloch”

[Tango @Tango_special]

@fahad_kahut @Gwahram99 Also different baloch groups like jadgal and brahui have more of a homogeneous autosomal profile with each other while Punjabi groups like Jatt and Rajput have more of a genetic gap

if Brahuis are not Baloch than you should have the same energy for the foreign castes in punjab

[Tango @Tango_special]

@fahad_kahut @Gwahram99 It is well known Baloch isn’t a linguistic ethnicity. Baloch is a qawm made up of different tribal communities just like how Punjab has Rajput,jat,Gujjar etc.

Different language doesn’t matter for us. Brahui are genetically Baloch. They are a tribal confederation within Baloch

[Tango @Tango_special]

@fahad_kahut Brahuis have been called Baloch from the start of times. Genetically they are baloch and history backs this claim aswell. Go play your dividing game elsewhere.

You should talk about the Punjabi identity being pushed on saraikis

[Baloch Archives @Baloch_Tarikh]

** Debunking the claim that the Brahuis were historically seen as separate from the Balochs. Sources from different periods and writers, with none from a Baloch author, show that Brahuis and the Brahui rulers of Kalat were consistently regarded as Balochs.

[Tango @Tango_special]

@fahad_kahut @Gwahram99 Brahui have been baloch from the start of time. History and genetics backs this up. You can play your dividing tactics elsewhere

[Baloch Archives @Baloch_Tarikh]

** Debunking the claim that the Brahuis were historically seen as separate from the Balochs. Sources from different periods and writers, with none from a Baloch author, show that Brahuis and the Brahui rulers of Kalat were consistently regarded as Balochs.

[Tango @Tango_special]

@dodojat26 @Gwahram99 @Manx4PM Do you have comprehension issues? The source states the reki tribe being present in Makran. Rekis are literally a baloch tribe 🤦‍♂️

[Tango @Tango_special]

@bannedwarrior1 @Gwahram99 Only thing got humiliated was u Indian mujeets who got asses torn and enslaved by the British. Than Hindus took control who tore a hole in your ass too

[Tango @Tango_special]

@bannedwarrior1 @Gwahram99 You’re got embarrassed mujew. You have humiliated yourself already with your post exposing your own kind 😂