your o̸r̴d̸i̷n̶a̴r̶y̴ virtual bistro keeper! 🥛 i cook video game, music, and pixel art! | EN/ID OK! | 2.1m/s with @voxainnemaple | @EvaVDateSim my beloved
It's your ordinary bistro keeper ᵗ̵ᵃ̵ⁿ̸ᶻ̶ ̴ᵈ̷ᵉ̸ᵛ̴ Brenda~!
Check out my stuff here :
🥛 https://t.co/r7XdsgvDC2 🥛
#TanzDevlog — Game Devlog
#TanzDrop — Music Discography
#PaintzDev — Visual Art
#TzeMilkLads — Your Fanworks
More info on reply!
It's your ordinary bistro keeper ᵗ̵ᵃ̵ⁿ̸ᶻ̶ ̴ᵈ̷ᵉ̸ᵛ̴ Brenda~!
Check out my stuff here :
🥛 https://t.co/r7XdsgvDC2 🥛
#TanzDevlog — Game Devlog
#TanzDrop — Music Discography
#PaintzDev — Visual Art
#TzeMilkLads — Your Fanworks
More info on reply!
It's your ordinary bistro keeper ᵗ̵ᵃ̵ⁿ̸ᶻ̶ ̴ᵈ̷ᵉ̸ᵛ̴ Brenda~!
Check out my stuff here :
🥛 https://t.co/r7XdsgvDC2 🥛
#TanzDevlog — Game Devlog
#TanzDrop — Music Discography
#PaintzDev — Visual Art
#TzeMilkLads — Your Fanworks
More info on reply!
Others in this thread has pointed it out. The comparison are drawn from the similar aspect of continuous maintainability in VTuber models and software developments, which now makes much more sense to me 🤔
(6/5 🧵)
So, I saw the discourse about L2D vtuber rigging, and how riggers should be expected to hand over the CMO file, which is essentially the raw, "naked" file of the rig 🤔
And then I also saw many arguments that stated if riggers don't deliver the raw files, they're(...)
(1/5 🧵)
The difference is that one is a custom made product just for you, the others is much closer to a shelf product.
So while I get the initial sentiment, the comparison feel kinda strange to me 🤔🤔
CMIIW
(5/5 🧵)