$taxistheft one of three Noxa coins on robinhood chain, I’m surprised people have left so early, soon these coins will be like old edition Pokémon cards that everyone will want. He did say no new launches but there are coins out there worth holding. I’m sure Noxa will come back and he’s got funds to invest and push his projects, after all he created history, he didn’t rug people, he just had to stop new launches because robinhood tried sueing him and people started selling. Now they are all buying back.
In two months time this will be worth millions.
0x65b73bA1cE6Cb8C865d5e2E0bBbC2C135F8Dd9b4
I believe Noxa had no option, what hurts me is that he could have just said the truth, I’m not saying he lied, he didn’t. I had a feeling he was fighting with RH over legal rights, they are the ones to blame. He couldn’t blame them to avoid charges. He was making 2 million $ in fees, you think he’d give that up? There was no LP scam, he’s still holding coins. I feel bad for him actually, he gave us hope to escape the pumpfun matrix.
Overall I don’t blame him, they were threatening to sue him.
Explanation:
Noxa appears to be facing significant legal challenges, likely stemming from copyright disputes with Robinhood due to the proliferation of tokens mimicking their branding. Following mass reports against their primary website, the developer has migrated the platform to a static site on IPFS. This decentralized approach ensures the interface remains accessible and allows users to continue claiming fees without fear of takedowns.
In a major shift, the developer has voluntarily relinquished all volume fees. These revenues are now redirected entirely to token deployers and CTOs, meaning the founder is generating zero revenue from the protocol moving forward.
While the exact legal specifics remain unconfirmed, it is evident that the pressure from frequent new launches and potential trademark infringement became unsustainable for a small team. By stepping away from what was reportedly $1–2 million in daily fees, the developer has adopted a 'Robinhood-like' stance—prioritizing the community’s financial well-being over personal profit. Whatever the precise catalyst, forfeiting such substantial income was undoubtedly a difficult decision.
the easiest way to 10x, possible 100x your money is buying $noxa on robinhood chain and simply touching grass.
0x39E0D9057BD9039Cd14590f54dE20B9D3457c56E
Our understanding of the situation:
Noxa appears to be facing significant legal challenges, likely stemming from copyright disputes with Robinhood due to the proliferation of tokens mimicking their branding. Following mass reports against their primary website, the developer has migrated the platform to a static site on IPFS. This decentralized approach ensures the interface remains accessible and allows users to continue claiming fees without fear of takedowns.
In a major shift, the developer has voluntarily relinquished all volume fees. These revenues are now redirected entirely to token deployers and CTOs, meaning the founder is generating zero revenue from the protocol moving forward.
While the exact legal specifics remain unconfirmed, it is evident that the pressure from frequent new launches and potential trademark infringement became unsustainable for a small team. By stepping away from what was reportedly $1–2 million in daily fees, the developer has adopted a 'Robinhood-like' stance—prioritizing the community’s financial well-being over personal profit. Whatever the precise catalyst, forfeiting such substantial income was undoubtedly a difficult decision.
@0xAlphaNinja Stop spreading scam launchapds, https://t.co/viNKQTtzQV already scammed people for $250K, this is another scam. Noxa is currently working on fixing his website, just wait.
Scam Alert 🚨 Robinhood - New launchpad - https://t.co/sVWx3LjnbG
$bow team and dev made over $250K on yall, only fresh wallets selling and it goes on and on.
That’s what happens when you can’t wait for @Noxa_Fi ’s new update and his new website.
Stop trying to be extra, relax, buy what is already out there on robinhood and do not enter any other launchpads or you will lose all of your money. 🚨
Shut the fuck up dude, stick to giving away "funded accounts" you scammer. No lies, Solana has been scamming for the last 3 years, the first 5 months of pumpfun were great, I used to create telegrams for people, we used to chill and talk on voice chat. Since then I’ve been scammed many times, I’ve lost a lot of money, I ended up in a bad place. I came back 2 years later (1 week ago) to Solana and lost another 2K, first day on Robinhood and I made x3, x5 and now I’m holding a few more coins that already did x5 for me, I have enough money to chill for a while, I’m out of the trenches so stick to your fucking funded accounts loser and remember that just because you have a profile picture holding a dog doesn’t make you genuine, it makes you look more like a scammer because you’re using animals to gain trust.
Guys, if you want to trade on Robinhood Chain as easily as possible, download Uniswap.
Transfer ETH to your wallet (or buy ETH directly in Uniswap), then swap your regular ETH for the green Robinhood ETH.
Once you have the green ETH, copy the token contract address (CA) from Dexscreener, paste it into Uniswap, and buy the token.
When you sell the token, you’ll receive green Robinhood ETH back.
The only tricky part is that you can’t swap the green ETH directly back to regular ETH inside Uniswap.
To convert it back, go to https://t.co/NMAnxi4RbT, connect your Uniswap wallet, and bridge your green Robinhood ETH to regular ETH. After that, your ETH will be ready to transfer or withdraw as usual.
Argentina vs Switzerland - Let me explain the rules, because many of you don’t actually know them. A referee is not allowed to review a second yellow card under any circumstances, and therefore cannot go to the pitch-side monitor for that purpose.
So the question is: why did he do it?
Here’s my explanation. It’s not that I dislike Argentina, but in my opinion the referee deliberately showed Argentina a yellow card for that challenge (even though, if it had simply been a foul, he wouldn’t have needed to issue one). He quickly realized that by doing so, he would then be allowed to review the incident because the situation could be treated as a case of mistaken identity, which is one of the situations that can be reviewed.
In that scenario, he could go to the monitor, cancel Argentina’s yellow card, and instead give Embolo a second yellow card for simulation.
Of course, Embolo clearly dived, but I’m convinced that the referees have been favouring Argentina throughout the tournament. In my opinion, the referee intentionally booked the Argentine player to exploit a loophole in the rules.
And before anyone says otherwise: no, a potential second yellow card (which would result in a red card) is not reviewable by VAR. That’s why the screen displayed “mistaken identity.”
FIFA is clever, and the referees know exactly what they’re doing.
2.
In the England vs. Norway match, the ball hit the camera cable, yet FIFA stated that the chip did not detect any movement. Why?
According to one user on X, the technology simply doesn’t work at that height, and that explanation makes sense.
FIFA doesn’t even seem to understand how its own systems work anymore. At this point, it’s no longer just about football—it’s about business and generating revenue.
#FIFAWorldCup @FabrizioRomano