@9mmsmg Dude. If you admit you think he didn’t act alone, then you have to say the current case against him is not the truth or 100% correct, which means reasonable doubt, which means he should not be convicted. No ?
@joelcomm@RealCandaceO@paleochristcon Andrew said the evidence is overwhelming… then he admits he thinks TR is 75% to 85% guilty… that’s reasonable doubt… case closed. No conviction.
How can you say he won the debate when he admitted he lost on its merits.
Your take here is weak!!!!!!!