@JonJon1267623@kan_immanuel Palestinians and Israelis are trying to kill each and have been in a hot conflict on/off for almost a century. Neither side is gonna a kill a leader for being too aggressive. I don’t think there’s a historical precedent for that at all in fact.
@methadvocate@Etanarachel Yeah, but isn’t the point that it was other *white people* that did the forcing?
If you don’t want Jews in your movement that’s fine, but I think that’s a *different approach* than those successful movements you’re referencing here
@realjdburn@astlin_wood@AaronBergman18 I think either of the below could work:
“The computer is talking there’s a guy in there”
“I don’t even know what consciousness is”
@PartySammael@Etanarachel Yeah, but the idea that Jews should be defecting and helping Hamas is absurd, no? There is no equivalent of the Allies here;
The idea that Jews should be violently overthrowing their govt when they have elections, etc is a bit over the top IMO
@nads_bf@Etanarachel What does it mean to treat it like a settler colony in this context though? The key difference vs other ones in context here IMO:
-Jews had legit claims to the land too
-it wasn’t a bloody conquest; not all “Jews stealing houses”
-the Pals had major states backing them in 48
@speechboy71 It’s not the “big” problem, but it is a problem and doesn’t help. I’m generally a supporter of most Israel’s actions, but they are not beyond reproach and people absolutely treat any criticism as antisemitism which weakens the meaning and impact of the term.
@sambecks31@MarkGoldfeder Do you think that the legal definition is different than what most people think of when they hear the word genocide? My understanding is that from a legal POV, the magnitude of people dying is not relevant (in fact, legally you don’t need any killing at all).
@hambinocapital@lukemiler For startups in particular (which is the context here), it’s even less a factor vs some of the high level decision-making and talent you have on board IMO
@hambinocapital@lukemiler My point is the grind is insufficient activity for success and a silly flex. The greats do grind, but it’s their innate talent that distinguishes them way more than the grind (bc everyone is grinding).
With work i, you can have still top outcome without 996 approach
@lukemiler Most athletes who do that don’t actually succeed. You know how many people do that and don’t make it to pros? Pretty much all of them. And then even most pros aren’t superstars despite it all.
People should work hard if that their thing, but it’s a silly flex
@joewrote@JeremiahDJohns What’s wrong with two states? We saw with Iraq you can’t just impose democracy on people that don’t want it. Two states with negotiated population transfers is more workable than imposing pluralistic one state with a large 3rd party military, like US forcing the peace