For those paying attention this comes as no surprise.
For those who have insulted and shat upon our greatest ally, the blanket of security that once protected your “morale high ground” is being pulled back.
This is not good.
It’s so not good, it’s difficult to quantify.
If you think the government's push for "lawful access" is just about fighting crime, you are missing the entire plot.
This is about total narrative and behavioural enclosure...
Connect the dots between Bill C-11 and Bill C-22: Bill C-11 (Input Control): They manipulated the algorithms. The state now dictates what political, cultural, and independent media you are allowed to see.
Bill C-22 (Output Control): They are coming for encryption. The state wants to shatter private spaces so they can track the texts, data, and dissent, leaving your home.
The most probable endgame?: Corporate-state censorship. If you cannot consume independent media, thought, or even conversations, contrary to the regime narrative your tax dollars fund the messaging of (C-11), and you cannot securely communicate anonymously and privately (C-22), effective political opposition is neutralized.
They are turning private global tech platforms into an automated domestic surveillance apparatus—all to protect the ruling establishment from public accountability. Don't let them label privacy as a crime... Don't let them scam you out of your freedom.
Wake up, Canada.
Welcome to Canada... where the global financial elite design the policies, the federal government uses our tax dollars to build the projects, the big monopolies pocket the guaranteed profits, and our own pension money is used to back the whole thing..leaving the public with a higher cost of living and fewer choices!
The real Canadian Dream!
“We’ve never lived in a world where 22-year-olds couldn’t assume that the work they did they would be able to do until death or retirement, and we’re never going to have that world again,” says former Nebraska Sen. Ben Sasse.
@erinotoole@petebreton@WabKinew Getting a drivers license doesn’t gain you access to information. You have hopped political ships and have joined the ship that is trying to restrict access to information. What information if your ship trying to hide!?!
@ryanjespersen Yes. It’d be wildly unprecedented and a wild level of betrayal to voting constituents.
UNLESS the vast majority of your constituents are telling you to switch parties, shouldn’t it be an absolute no go due to the oaths these people take?
@BizNasty2point0 A gathering of staunch NDP supporters meeting/announcing/talking political ideas and views as the NDP just internally elected a new federal leader. It’s something, eh? 🐈
This week in Canada is wild.
The government moves forward with a hate speech law that expands what online speech can be investigated. At the same time, a new lawful access proposal would require telecom companies to maintain the ability to track users’ locations if authorities request it with a warrant. Meanwhile, the Online Harms Act continues moving forward, which would allow a Digital Safety Commission to order platforms to remove certain content within 24 hours.
Individually, each one is framed as protection from hate, crime, and harmful content, but all of these moving forward at the same time, the bigger question becomes obvious.
Why are we expanding speech regulation, surveillance capability, and content control all in the same moment?
Right.. to protect us.... like this? I honestly am feeling so sad that the brainwashing has worked for them.
@MarkJCarney Why aren’t YOU doing the same and vacation locally, instead of your planned holidays in UK and Italy? Leadership from the front is admired everywhere, why not practice it?