If Kendrick Lamar made ICEMAN...
(Full mashup album)
01. FIREMAN INTRO - 0:00
02. wacced out murals x Make Them Cry - 1:11
03. DNA. x Janice STFU & Dust - 6:02
04. Silent Hill x Whisper My Name - 9:22
05. euphoria x Ran To Atlanta - 12:40
06. family ties x Shabang, Dust & National Treasures - 17:56
07. The Heart Part 2 x Make Them Pay - 22:31
08. United In Grief x Burning Bridges - 26:47
09. 30 For 30 x B's On The Table - 30:58
10. range brothers x What Did I Miss? - 35:13
11. untitled 02 | 06.23.2014. x Plot Twist - 39:10
12. squabble up x 2 Hard 4 The Radio - 43:12
13. Kush & Corinthians x Make Them Remember - 45:45
14. gnx x Little Birdie - 51:08
15. Hol' Up x Don’t Worry - 53:23
16. Faith x Firm Friends - 56:10
17. FEEL. x Make Them Know - 1:00:57
🚨🚨 BREAKING: COURT OF APPEAL DECLARES - A TITLE DEED CANNOT DEFEAT A PROVEN TRUST
In Erick Kipkurgat Kiprono v Patrick Kimutai Kiprono, the Court of Appeal has sent shockwaves through land ownership disputes after ordering a registered landowner to surrender half of land he held solely in his name. The dispute traces back to around 2000 when two parties allegedly agreed to jointly purchase 10 acres from Lonrho Agribusiness for KSh 350,000. Because one party worked in Nairobi, the other handled the transaction. The sale agreement expressly stated the purchaser was acting as agent for both and even allocated 5 acres each in the schedule. However, when the title was eventually issued, the entire land was registered in only one name. When the excluded party later demanded his share, the registered owner flatly denied any joint purchase, contribution, or trust.
The Court of Appeal was not convinced. After re-evaluating the evidence, the judges found the intention to jointly own the land was not speculative; it was written into the very sale agreement used to obtain Land Control Board consent. Testimony from the attesting advocate, the vendor’s lawyer, and the vendor’s representative all confirmed the joint purchase. The Court emphasized that a trust will be implied where parties’ intention is clearly established, and that equity will not allow a registered proprietor to approbate and reprobate by relying on the same agreement to obtain title while denying the beneficial interest recorded in it. Crucially, the Court held that the Land Control Act could not be used as an instrument of fraud where consent had already been obtained on the basis of a disclosed joint interest.
For the ordinary mwananchi, this decision is a serious reality check. Many people believe the name on the title deed is the end of the story, it is not. If evidence shows land was bought jointly or one party acted as agent for another, courts can and will slice through the register and enforce a trust. What many are not ready for is this: informal family arrangements, handshake land deals, and “weka kwa jina yako kwanza” transactions are legally dangerous. Going forward, anyone entering joint land purchases must document contributions clearly and align registration with the true intention; because in today’s Kenya, the courts are increasingly willing to look beyond the title and follow the money and the intention.
Kindly retweet widely.
@georgediano@Thuranira_1@DavisThuranira@joshuamalidzo@NelsonHavi Iran #NunuaGariUsijenge #MainaAndKingangi World Wildlife Day #UsalamaBarabarani Road Safety Reforms Trump Kuwait Wamuthende Dubai
I don’t think anybody who listened to the AJ Styles on Stephanie podcast could realistically come out of it thinking that wrestling anytime soon is anywhere on AJ’s mind.
Also undoing his retirement just a little over a month later at Revolution would be an all time dumb decision. Respectfully.
BOMBSHELL EXCLUSIVE AT TOTTENHAM!
INSIDERS AT SPURS HQ REVEAL: ANOTHER EMERGENCY CRISIS MEETING CALLED FOR TOMORROW OVER THOMAS FRANK FUTURE! 😱
ONE TOP OFFICIAL IS FURIOUSLY DEMANDING HE BE SACKED IMMEDIATELY 💣