There may be something to the theory that 2026 is either going to be a blue monsoon or Republicans just ride their monetary edge to wipe the floor in the swing races out of nowhere. Polling in general is broken, and this cycle is the hardest to predict going back before 2016.
Lindsay Clancy actually killed her 3 kids
A Black juror didn't kill anyone
Guess which one White Liberals have demonized more?
This is what blatant racism looks like when it wears a liberal mask
Charlie Kirk:
“Abortion is murder according to my Christian faith”
“DEI is racist”
“Communism failed everywhere it was tried”
“Gender transition of minors is wrong”
“There are only 2 genders”
Liberals:
“He was the most evil person on Earth and I’m glad he’s dead”
The Kirk jokes are not tasteless or bad, or some sort of dark humor. They are statements of evil. They’re expressions of glee of the death of a young father of two. They’re a signal that they wish death upon me and my friends. So no, it’s not a bad day or tasteless, it’s evil
Strangle your three toddlers?
Run over an ICE agent?
Stab a kid at a track meet?
Shoot a healthcare CEO?
The Left will praise you.
Get assassinated while bringing civil discourse to campuses?
They’ll dance on your grave.
What If Christians Had Done 9/11 to a Muslim Country?
Imagine 19 Christians hijacked planes, destroyed a Muslim country’s most iconic buildings, struck its military headquarters, and slaughtered thousands-while declaring they did it for Christianity and quoting the Bible.
Imagine their Christian leader claimed responsibility, Christians funded and protected his organization, and pastors celebrated the massacre.
What would happen to Christians across Muslim countries?
Would everyone suddenly preach tolerance and insist Christianity had absolutely nothing to do with it? Would churches and Christian minorities be left alone?
And 25 years later, would the attacked city elect a Christian mayor while critics of Christianity were condemned as “Christianophobes”?
You know the answer.
So spare me the hypocrisy.
Only thing I'll mention about 9/11 today since I don't see it mentioned as much:
The search dogs got visibly stressed and actually lost morale from finding so many deceased people that workers would have to stage "successful rescues" (live people) for them.
Man, my heart..
The other jurors have spent all week calling the lone male holdout an arrogant, uncooperative dummy who didn’t understand the law or follow the rules. Now we come to find out that they were talking about the only black guy in the room this whole time. Leftists have accidentally sided with 11 white bullies against a black man who stood up to them. Just an absolutely amazing twist. You couldn’t script it any better.
Leftists have gone from rallying around Lindsay Clancy last week to celebrating Charlie’s murder today, as they’ve been doing for the past year. A couple months ago they were cheering on Karmelo Anthony. Before that it was Luigi Mangione. To say nothing of supporting the systematic mass slaughter of babies for the past 60 years. This is an ideology of destruction. A death cult.
Almost 1 year ago, I offered a Pulitzer-Prize-winning-journalist $10,000 if she could find video evidence of the exact quote she was attributing to Charlie in her post, word for word.
She has NEVER found it.
This is Pulitzer Prize winning journalist...
Women were never oppressed. There was NO oppression. What women call oppression today was just PROTECTION.
Let me break it down for you:
1. VOTING:
Women say "we couldn't vote." But back then, voting was not a right, it was a RESPONSIBILITY. Only people who owned property, paid heavy taxes, held public office, or were drafted to DIE in wars could vote.
100% of the people dying in wars were men. You want to vote to send men to war, while you sit at home safe? Makes zero sense. Voting was linked to the DRAFT. You vote, you go to war. Men understood that.
2. BANKING:
"You needed your husband's signature!" Yes, because by LAW, a woman was LEGALLY PROTECTED from debt. Her husband was the head of household and by law HE was 100% liable for ALL debts she made. If she borrowed and couldn't pay, THEY CAME FOR HIM, not her. Creditors went to jail or lost everything - the husband.
So of course his signature was needed. He is the one who goes to prison if you don't pay.
3. PROPERTY - COVERTURE:
They cry about coverture. Coverture meant when you marry, your property merges under ONE name, the husband's, because there was ONE tax filing per household, not two like today. ONE household, ONE name, ONE tax.
It was not to steal from you. It was because the husband was legally responsible for you. If you got sued, he paid. If you owed taxes, he paid. He took your debts too.
These men had mothers they worshipped and daughters they would die for. They were not oppressing women, they were covering them.
4. CONTROLLING WOMEN'S BODIES:
The biggest lie. Back then there were NO abortion pills, NO condoms that worked, NO diapers, NO formula, NO government money to raise a child alone as a single mother, NO good jobs for women to survive alone.
Who bears the most risk in unprotected sex? THE WOMAN. She gets pregnant for 9 months, she risks death during childbirth, which was very common then.
So what did society do? They made sure women stayed virgins until marriage, and made sure men MARRIED them before sex. That is not oppression, that is PROTECTION from becoming a single mother with 3 kids and no food.
And it WORKED. Single motherhood rate was less than 5%. Marriage rate was 90%. Children grew up with fathers.
Today you have "freedom" - 40% single mothers, fatherless homes, abortions everywhere, and women crying that men don't want them.
There was never oppression. There was a system that understood biology and protected women from the consequences of their own choices.
Lindsay Clancy did not plan her children’s murders the day she did it.
She started laying the groundwork for a trial 5 months prior. How do I know? The evidence is clear if you look through a nurse’s eyes.
As an RN, the first thing we’re taught is that “if you didn’t document it, it didn’t happen” in regards to patient care. Lindsay was an L&D nurse. She heard that line in school and on every unit she ever worked.
Callan was only a few months old when she began “seeking treatment”. She told doctors she was depressed and anxious. She did not tell them she was suicidal or homicidal. She knew exactly what those words do. One statement of intent to harm herself or the kids and she is in a locked unit. If they even suspected she wanted to hurt anyone, it would have unleashed a chain reaction that would prevent her from completing her plan. She wanted freedom and she knew just what lines not to cross to reach that goal.
What she did do was write it down. Diary entries. Texts. Conversations with her husband and her mother. Thoughts of harming herself and the children. That paper trail exists for a reason. It is the documentation she knew a future jury would see.
For months the pattern held: disclose the dark thoughts to family and to a journal. Minimize or deny them to the people who could actually help.
Cycle through providers. We call that “doctor shopping” in the medical world and it’s a clear indicator of someone who wants specific medicines or is trying to avoid coordination between doctors. She KNEW the system and exactly how to use it.
Collect prescriptions. Zoloft, Prozac, Seroquel, Valium, Klonopin, Ativan, Lamictal, amitriptyline—thirteen medications, more than thirty prescriptions. A nurse knows which side effects to report to get a med changed or dose adjusted. The list itself became the evidence she wanted. We don’t know if she ever took any of them except on the day of the crime.
As a mom, if I were having actual thoughts of hurting my kids, I’d be the first one screaming it to every doctor, every nurse. I’d make sure I was locked away where I couldn’t actually hurt them. But not Lindsay. She did all she could to not be locked away.
When the Women & Infants postpartum program discharged her after one day because she didn’t fit the criteria, the calendar was not on her side. Callan was eight months old. The cleanest “postpartum psychosis” window was already gone. She had to execute sooner rather than later.
She planned it to the minute. As a nurse, she knew exactly how long it would take to strangle each child—about six minutes. She sent her husband on errands that would keep him out of the house long enough to kill all three and stage what was supposed to look like a suicide attempt.
Her medical education ensured she knew EXACTLY how deep and what direction to cut her wrists to ensure she wouldn’t bleed out. She knew EXACTLY how deep and where to cut her neck to avoid hitting the carotid arteries, the jugular veins, or compromise her airway. She even knew jumping out a 2nd story window wouldn’t be fatal but would look dramatic to a future jury. Every cut, every decision was calculated, cold, and with the medical training to execute the plan flawlessly (the injuries she sustained were a miscalculation from landing wrong, not the fall itself).
Lindsay Clancy is not a woman who “snapped with no warning.” or even one who was failed by her family and the healthcare system. She is a woman who spent months building a file and setting the stage so she could blame her crime on those very people while she could live out the childless life she dreamed of living.
My theory is that Lindsay Clancy murdered her children to punish her husband, Patrick.
He was a good dad. He came from a very supportive family. He loved those kids. He seems to have picked up all the slack enthusiastically. I bet those kids adored him.
She probably resented that. She could have done it because the jealousy was eating her up and she wanted to hurt Patrick in retaliation.
Eight months postpartum would be pretty rare for psychotic symptoms to suddenly appear. In reading through everything, I have not seen enough evidence to be convinced that she was actually experiencing psychotic symptoms. I think she knew what to say.
Moreover, many keep saying that “the system” failed her. I find this very hard to justify because she seems to have had more access to care and support than most working women with three kids (including worry-free childcare while she was hospitalized and after so she could attend appointments). Many people are overlooking that part of the story.
I see a system that was hearing her and tried very hard to help her, but instead, she was using it to formulate her defense.
This case feels very calculated. Even down to the detailed journals of her medication regimen. An overwhelmed mom cycling in and out of reality due to postpartum hormones would struggle immensely with keeping such a well-organized, detailed daily diary, to the point of being almost unheard of. She needed some way to build her case for sympathy.
That’s just my two cents.
You’ve been lied to about Lindsay Clancy, she wasn’t some struggling mom, she was very privileged
“The 8 month old baby was born. The 3 and 5 year old were in daycare full-time. Patrick took a 12 week paternity leave, and they hired a nanny to help with the newborn baby. After the 12 week leave was over, Patrick could see that Lindsay needed more help and support, so he decided to move his office into home and started working from home.
So they decided they didn't need the nanny anymore because Patrick was gonna stay home, and you guys are saying that this woman had no support? That is false.
A key factor that you guys are missing of this whole entire thing, and you're letting this woman play on your emotions, she was a labor and delivery nurse herself. She was in this career path. Lindsay knew, she knew, if I tell my doctors that I am hearing voices and having thoughts of harming my children, they're going to be taken away from me. She knew that. She is smart, she's calculated, and this was premeditated.
Any woman going through actual psychosis, especially with the career path she was in, being very educated on this, she would have gone to her doctors and said, "I need them away from me because I think I'm gonna kill them." She didn't do that.
Why? Because she wanted the opportunity to kill her three kids. She Googled how to kill. She Googled how long it would take Patrick to go from the house to the restaurant. She murdered one child. Patrick called. She missed the call. She called back after killing one child and said, "We're good here. Everything's fine. We're fine."’
She also gives an excellent medicine breakdown on how there is no way she was actually in the state of mind she claims to be
“You guys are letting a very smart and calculated woman manipulate you and play on your emotions, and it's working, and a jury really might let her walk because… it's scary”
And now we have a mistrial….
The only correction here is the children were in preschool not daycare but either way they were not in the home and being attended to at preschool 3 and a half days a week. The callback after the first murder is speculation but she 100% did call Patrick back after he called her. Showing she was definitely not in some psychosis
Lindsay Clancy was very privileged. Her husband is estimated to make between $258,000-$482,000 per year based on his job and Glassdoor salaries