I’ve seen three dems now running on just fully catering to the right wing on trans people.
And no outcry from other lib politicians. But please tell me more how trans people are so “ungrateful” for the “support” we get from DNC dems.
Flávio Bolsonaro decidiu ser um golpista medíocre, tal qual o pai, e afirmou que vai pedir a “anulação” das eleições de hoje.
@FlavioBolsonaro, deixa eu te explicar:
Vocês tentaram nos impedir de estar nas redes e falharam.
Vocês tentaram nos proibir de expor quem vocês são e falharam.
Vocês tentaram nos barrar de chegar às urnas e falharam.
Vocês tentaram sabotar a democracia e falharam.
Tentem o que vocês quiserem. Somos 64 milhões que se recusam a voltar a 1964.
O povo venceu, Lula venceu, e nada anula isso.
Reconheça seu fracasso e lembre-se: nós nos reorganizamos. A qualquer momento, a gente pode ocupar as ruas até a justiça anular a prisão domiciliar do seu pai.
Mas talvez seja isso que você queira, né? Alguém pra te fazer companhia na papudinha.
Derrotamos a Meta.
Derrotamos as bets.
Derrotamos os EUA.
Derrotamos a milícia.
Derrotamos a Faria Lima.
Derrotamos a turma do Vorcaro.
Derrotamos Flávio Bolsonaro.
Lula é tetra, e de virada.
Isso é HISTÓRIA, e cada uma e cada um de vocês ajudou a escrever 💗
It's always nice to pull one quote out of a 42-minute video, isn't it? Which tells me this was either cherry-picked, or the person posting it didn't actually watch the whole thing. I say through this vile and disgusting video for 42 minutes. Not just cherry picked one quote.
The irony of Shoe0nHead claiming that cases like Cornell make "real victims less believable" (40:10) is incredible, considering she spent much of the video doing exactly that.
Without fail, every time a sexual assault case makes headlines, it's the same shit. "But what if she's lying?" And suddenly we're dissecting the woman's sex life, her behavior, her credibility, and whether her trauma responses are believable enough.
She starts the video mocking whatever women are supposedly outraged about this week (00:15). Then she insinuates the accuser only called it rape because she was embarrassed and got uninvited to a Halloween party (11:44–12:04). She mocks women sharing their own sexual assault experiences (15:16) and then ridicules trauma responses (20:43–22:02).
And here's something that really bothers me. Jane Doe initially consenting to a threesome does not mean she consented to a gangbang. It certainly doesn't mean she consented to other men being invited upstairs, or someone advertising her as "free pussy" in a fraternity group chat. Shoe0nHead even acknowledges those messages (07:06). How the hell is that not worth discussing more?
Instead, she spends an absurd amount of time going off about feminism, hookup culture, pornography, and women's sexual freedom (33:23–39:38). What the hell does any of that have to do with whether this woman was sexually assaulted?
And here's another thing. According to RAINN's estimates, approximately 73% of sexual assaults aren't even reported to police, and only around 2.8% result in felony convictions. Yet every time one of these cases comes up, the discussion somehow turns into false accusations being the biggest problem.
I'm sorry, but that's ridiculous.
The accused absolutely deserve due process. Nobody is arguing otherwise. But the accuser deserves to have her allegations properly investigated too. Not being criminally charged doesn't automatically mean someone didn't commit the alleged acts, and it certainly doesn't prove the accuser lied. Especially when the original prosecutor acknowledged he never received the full interview containing her explicit rape allegations.
Then she brings up Duke lacrosse and Rolling Stone (17:49–20:43), practically inviting everyone to assume this is another false accusation, while criticizing other people for jumping to conclusions. She mocks women's understanding of consent (23:20–25:30), speculates about the accuser's motives, and somehow presents herself as the reasonable, objective person in the room.
If she's so concerned about real victims not being believed, maybe she should consider what spending 42 minutes mocking women, dismissing trauma, and publicly humiliating a potential victim does to those same victims.
Vile and disgusting person.
All Democrats have to do is talk about the housing crisis, livable wage and affordable healthcare..
but instead they call for a ban of life-saving medical care for 1% of the population to appeal to cruel, disgusting people
Liberals "supporting" trans people isn't why they lose
Trans people vote for Democrats overwhelmingly. They don't even consider the idea of voting for Republicans. But because they even *dare* to express concern when Democrats indicate eroding support they're apparently garbage allies that should necessarily be thrown away posthaste.
The pedophile protection party’s president is laundering right-wing conspiracy theories through the most corrupt DOJ in American history.
Whenever the news turns bad, this creep reaches for one name: mine. So let’s make it crystal clear. My name has always been Ilhan Omar.
Maybe you should focus on what your VP’s real name is.
there's evidence that the use of AI in schools is delivering the opposite of "intellectual flourishing"—maybe in some bubbles the use of these models is leading to more reading and philosophical debates but I'm inclined to think that's an exception to the rule
"I support the rights of trans women because I'm a girls' girl," says AOC. "The right to choose over our bodies is the right to choose over our bodies."
To help against misinformation:
This is the result of the Saudi Arabian buyout deal. The most ridiculous deal ever made where EA could barely cover the cost of the debt it accrued.
A lot of people will attach their personal feelings to the "why" but this is the real reason ^
Their entire ideology is just porn. Their values, their beliefs, their emotional attachments can all be swayed at a moments notice with pornified symbols and cheap, high impulse entertainment slop. Genuine subhuman cattle.