Tülin Bbbbr @tgenc71 - Twitter Profile

Tgenc71 retweeted

about 1 month ago

Those who erase 1963 have no credibility when talking about 1974. You cannot explain Cyprus by starting the story in 1974. The real question is why 103 Turkish Cypriot villages were attacked, why thousands of Turkish Cypriots were forced into enclaves covering barely 3% of the island, and why hundreds were killed between 1963 and 1974. The answer is simple: Enosis. The Akritas Plan was not a Turkish invention. It was a blueprint prepared by Greek Cypriot leaders to dismantle the constitutional partnership, neutralize Turkish Cypriot resistance and ultimately unite the island with Greece. "Bloody Christmas" in December 1963 was not an isolated incident. It marked the beginning of an organized campaign that devastated not only Turkish Cypriots but also Greek Cypriots who opposed extremism and endless conflict. Enosis brought fear, displacement and authoritarian violence to both communities. For years, these facts have been deliberately buried beneath a narrative that begins in 1974, because acknowledging 1963 also means acknowledging why 1974 happened. Türkiye's 1974 intervention was not an act of conquest. It was carried out under the rights granted by the Treaty of Guarantee to stop further bloodshed and prevent the destruction of the Turkish Cypriot community. The clearest proof lies in what followed. Since 1974, despite political disagreements, the island has not witnessed another episode of intercommunal mass bloodshed. The presence of Turkish forces has preserved a balance that prevented Cyprus from returning to the violence of the 1960s. Those who endlessly demand the withdrawal of Turkish troops while remaining silent about the atrocities that made their deployment necessary should first explain what security arrangement they propose to prevent history from repeating itself.

hermes_z's tweet photo. Those who erase 1963 have no credibility when talking about 1974.

You cannot explain Cyprus by starting the story in 1974.

The real question is why 103 Turkish Cypriot villages were attacked, why thousands of Turkish Cypriots were forced into enclaves covering barely 3% of the island, and why hundreds were killed between 1963 and 1974.

The answer is simple: Enosis.

The Akritas Plan was not a Turkish invention. It was a blueprint prepared by Greek Cypriot leaders to dismantle the constitutional partnership, neutralize Turkish Cypriot resistance and ultimately unite the island with Greece.

"Bloody Christmas" in December 1963 was not an isolated incident.
It marked the beginning of an organized campaign that devastated not only Turkish Cypriots but also Greek Cypriots who opposed extremism and endless conflict.
Enosis brought fear, displacement and authoritarian violence to both communities.

For years, these facts have been deliberately buried beneath a narrative that begins in 1974, because acknowledging 1963 also means acknowledging why 1974 happened.

Türkiye's 1974 intervention was not an act of conquest.
It was carried out under the rights granted by the Treaty of Guarantee to stop further bloodshed and prevent the destruction of the Turkish Cypriot community.

The clearest proof lies in what followed. Since 1974, despite political disagreements, the island has not witnessed another episode of intercommunal mass bloodshed.
The presence of Turkish forces has preserved a balance that prevented Cyprus from returning to the violence of the 1960s.

Those who endlessly demand the withdrawal of Turkish troops while remaining silent about the atrocities that made their deployment necessary should first explain what security arrangement they propose to prevent history from repeating itself.

3

248

91

13

31K

Tgenc71 retweeted

Ece Sevim

@ecesevimtr

9 days ago

Başlıyoruz

1

249

40

0

4K

Tülin Bbbbr

@Tgenc71

Who to follow

Last Seen Users on Sotwe

Trends for you

Most Popular Users