@sdmnfcupdates He got a 2-game suspension. Which mathematically tells the league '' you are allowed to assault players 5 times and still play 5/13 of the league (including final''
@BallerLeagueUK Holy shit. Regarding this 2-game suspension: this means mathematically a player could assault other players 5 times in a season and STILL play 5/13 of Baller League (including final). ๐
@kbo_coyote@Math_files Yea wrap it up bro, you dont understand the question, substituted looking back at the question with slapping me with a chatgpg answer, saying nothing.
@kbo_coyote@Math_files Just in case you have yet to realize: if we โclarifyโ they both had the SAME SIZED pizza, marty cannot have eaten more if he ate 4/6 and luis ate 5/6.
@BurtRock69@Math_files If you really want to be specific, the โ>25%โ is implied by the given outcome, but itโs not necessary to state unless the question explicitly requests a numerical condition. Obviously you โwonโt accept thisโ because you are thinking of a subquestion u bum
@kbo_coyote@Math_files No that would ruin the whole point of the highlighted Reasonableness. The whole point is to reason around the question of how could someone consume a lesser fraction, yet eat more?
@TateTheTalisman It originated from the rapper skrilla, who repeats 67 in the song โDoot Doot (6 7)โ , the sound got used a ton in basketball highlights, especially with Lamelo Ball because his height is listed at 6โ7-> became a hype chant-> snowballed into โa funny numberโ sort of like 69
@ClarryKitten@JIX5A@UB1UB2 Ironic, where is your logic x). Even if men often offered seats when women had lower social status, that doesnโt prove the seat-offering was only a โtoken of subordination. Thatโs a non sequitur + false cause: you treat a historical overlap as the sole explanation.