ELON MUSK: “My political views are very centrist. They’re not far right. Frankly, calling them far right is an insult to history and an insult to many people. It is an outrageous falsehood. It’s completely absurd. I have literally stated my position, and I’ve been very clear about this: there need to be secure borders.
If there’s an influx of immigrants, then they need to be people who agree with Western ideals and Western values. If there is long-term growth of people who do not, or in some cases are adamantly opposed to Western values, you are setting yourself up for civil war. This is obvious. A child can see this, but this is not a right wing view. I'm simply stating reality.”
🟠 #BREAKING: LABOR IS QUIETLY PAYING JOURNALIST WAGES AT 184 NEWSROOMS 🟠
Anika Wells' $67.6 million Journalism Assistance Fund is part paying the wages of more than 2,000 journalists, and more than half the money went to just four ownership groups.
Nine took $16.1 million. Seven's side of the new Southern Cross group took $11.3 million. Crikey, The Conversation, The Saturday Paper and Mamamia are all there.
News Corp, Sky News and The Guardian were barred from even applying. Opinion writing doesn't count as news under the government's own rules. And no funded newsroom ever has to tell its readers.
The fund ran dry in 28 days. One recipient was two days old. Another collapsed five weeks later.
We've published the full table: all 184 recipients, every company, every owner, every dollar and their share of the fund:
https://t.co/pkN1NdRpM8
As someone who grew up in the Muslim world, I’ve seen this pattern repeat itself:
When Muslims are weak and in the minority, they speak endlessly about tolerance, coexistence, and peace.
When they become strong and gain power, that tolerance completely disappears, even toward their own people.
This isn’t an opinion. This is historical fact, proven across centuries and across many countries.
The West needs to understand this pattern before it’s too late.
Tolerance in Islam is not a principle. It’s a strategy.
If your country wants to control social media algorithms to force people to watch state approved content, then you don't live in a free country anymore.
Binance's margin system architecture created the conditions for cascade failure
On October 10, 2025, $19 billion in leveraged positions evaporated in hours. The official narrative blames Trump's tariff announcement and excessive leverage. That's technically correct but deliberately incomplete. The real culprit is sitting in Binance's margin system design, which functioned as a loaded gun pointed at retail traders while executives marketed the magazine.
Binance operates a non-standard margin framework that diverges fundamentally from industry best practices. Where competitors restrict collateral to USDT or traditional coin-margined futures, Binance invented a Frankenstein's monster: they allow proof-of-stake derivatives and yield-bearing stablecoins as collateral. This wasn't accidental architecture. It was intentional product design that maximized onboarded leverage and dependency on volatile underlying assets. Ethena's USDe was the focal point. Users were encouraged to convert USDT and USDC into USDe to chase yield, then use that USDe as margin collateral to borrow more stablecoins, reconvert to USDe, repeat. This created a self-reinforcing leverage machine that made 50x returns feel achievable and safe because the yield was "real." Except it wasn't. The yield was a promise dependent on the very market conditions that would shatter once macro pressure hit.
When Trump announced 100% China tariffs on October 10, the macro trigger was legitimate. Bitcoin fell from $122,000 toward $105,000. That's real selling. But here's where Binance's negligence compounds the damage: as margin accounts started approaching liquidation thresholds, traders needed to either deposit collateral or close positions. On most platforms, this is routine. On Binance, the system melted. Their API failed. Their interface froze. Transfer systems from spot to futures accounts experienced slowdowns so severe that traders couldn't move capital between their own accounts fast enough to maintain solvency. This wasn't a feature. This was infrastructure collapse at the exact moment it mattered most.
Then came the oracle failure. USDe was supposed to be a delta-neutral stablecoin, backed by U.S. Treasury bonds and Ethereum staking. It should stay pegged to $1. On most exchanges it did, even dipping only to $0.92 on cross-venue aggregated pricing. On Binance, it crashed to $0.62. Not because the asset fundamentally broke. Because Binance's pricing engine broke. When USDe is marked down to $0.62 by Binance's oracle system, that asset instantly becomes worthless collateral. Every trader holding USDe on margin saw their available collateral evaporate. Liquidation cascade.
The forensics matter here. Between October 6 and October 14, Binance announced oracle improvements but delayed implementation. During that 8-day window, attackers allegedly dumped $90 million of USDe, precisely exploiting the known vulnerability in Binance's valuation method before the fix went live. The stablecoin price plummeted on Binance's books alone. Traders couldn't execute stop-losses. Binance's overloaded systems prevented them from closing positions to avoid liquidation. This is not a market crash. This is a technical entrapment followed by forced liquidation.
Binance's insurance fund paid out $188 million. The platform liquidated roughly $2.4 billion in positions. That means $2.2 billion in losses were simply absorbed by traders whose positions hit zero. No insurance. No recovery. Just wiped out because Binance's infrastructure failed and their margin system allowed collateral that could be instantly devalued by oracle failure.
The dominance problem compounds this. Binance handles the largest share of global derivatives volume. When Binance breaks, market-wide trust evaporates. Traders stop believing that any exchange can stay operational during stress. Liquidity dries up across all platforms. OKX CEO Star Xu later went on record stating the crash damage exceeded the FTX collapse in severity. That's not rhetoric. That's describing a systemic shock created by Binance's failure to maintain operational integrity and prudent risk architecture during a known macro event.
Six months later, in May 2026, Cathie Wood walked back earlier comments blaming Binance. The narrative shifted to "systemic leverage was the real problem." Convenient. Because the macro shock angle absolves Binance of responsibility for their own technical failures and reckless margin system design. But the data doesn't care about narratives. USDe traded at $0.62 on Binance and $0.92 elsewhere. That's not leverage. That's infrastructure failure. The macro shock would have caused volatility on any platform. Binance's design and technical failures converted volatility into annihilation.
It looks like they're trying to sack my good friend Karl Stefanovic for this video with Tommy Robinson!
Deb Knight was a huge flop for Channel 9 and while she was busy grilling me over One Nation’s polling Channel 9's ratings were in the toilet.
In 2019 on live TV with her, I called on Channel 9 to bring back Karl.
Now with 6 months to go on his contract the weak management of Channel 9 want to sack Karl over this interview.
Tommy Robinson has a lesson for Australians. If we don’t learn from the UK’s mistakes on immigration and radical Islam, we are going to face the same destruction.
This is exactly what Karl was trying to bring to Australia’s attention.
Have Channel 9 become just as bad as the ABC? Watch the full interview: https://t.co/5H9wL9YzwI
Did they cover the UK Rape Gang Inquiry?
Legacy Media…
BBC: No
CNN: No
MSNBC: No
ABC News: No
CBS News: No
NBC News: No
USA Today: No
New York Times: No
Washington Post: No
Like it didn’t happen.
Thousands of girls tortured. Like they never existed.
Pure evil.
Wonder why?
They aren’t “Asian” grooming gangs.
They aren’t even just Pakistani gangs.
But they are always Muslim.
It is gangs of Muslim men who groomed, abused, raped, sodomised, tortured, kidnapped, and murdered hundreds of thousands little girls across the UK.
Grooming gangs are usually Pakistani. Some gang members have been Iraqi, Afghan, or Iranian too.
But they are always Muslim.
That isn’t Islamophobic. It’s reality.
Today, on my final day as Director of National Intelligence, I’m releasing never-before-seen communications and documents exposing how Dr. Fauci provided millions in US taxpayer dollars to fund dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab, worked with politicized elements within the Intelligence Community to suppress the truth about his actions and hide the virus’ lab-leak origins, and lied to Congress while under oath in 2024. It’s time you know the truth.
https://t.co/3YJSstB7d4
Beaucoup de figures de gauche, aux US comme en Europe, qualifient Musk d'extrême droite. Certains vont jusqu'au mot « nazi ».
J'ai fait l'inverse de l'accusation : lire avant de juger. Deux biographies. Des dizaines d'heures d'interviews et de documentaires. Zéro once de racisme détectée.
Ce que j'ai trouvé, c'est une obsession constante pour la liberté : rachat de Twitter au nom de la liberté d'expression, réintégration des comptes bannis, publication des Twitter Files, ouverture du code de l'algorithme, open-source de Grok, brevets Tesla libérés en 2014, Starlink rallumé pour les Iraniens coupés du net pendant les manifestations et pour l'Ukraine, refus répété des demandes de censure étatiques.
Maintenant, faisons l'expérience de pensée que ses accusateurs ne font jamais. Imaginez que Musk soit réellement evil.
Cet homme possède un réseau de satellites qui couvre la planète, soit une capacité de surveillance quasi totale. Il possède la place publique numérique la plus influente du monde. Il possède la première fortune à 1000 milliards de l'Histoire, depuis l'IPO de SpaceX le 12 juin. Aucun individu n'a jamais concentré autant de leviers.
Un Musk réellement malveillant, avec ça dans les mains, ne tolérerait pas une seconde qu'on le traite de nazi H24 sur sa propre plateforme. Il bannirait. Il surveillerait. Il écraserait. On serait déjà dans 1984.
Or regardez la réalité : les comptes qui l'accusent de nazisme tweetent toujours. Tous les jours. Sans entrave. Sur son réseau. Avec son algorithme. La dystopie totalitaire qu'on lui prête se démontre par l'absence du goulag.
Voilà le retournement. 1984 le contrôle de la parole, la surveillance de masse, la désignation publique des hérétiques ce n'est pas son projet. C'est le fantasme de ceux qui l'accusent. L'accusation décrit toujours l'accusateur.
C'est du Girard à l'état pur : on désigne un bouc émissaire pour ne pas voir le mécanisme qu'on porte soi-même. Celui qui hurle « nazi » rêve souvent, en silence, du pouvoir de bannir, de ficher, de faire taire.
L'homme qui aurait tous les moyens de bâtir 1984 est précisément celui qui laisse ses pires détracteurs parler. Demandez-vous qui, dans cette histoire, rêve vraiment du télécran.
If white Christian men had systematically raped 250,000 brown children for a decade, it would be the biggest scandal of half a century.
But because brown Muslim men did it to white children, the authorities continue covering it up, and media continues refusing to talk about it.
Elon Musk: ”I think there are great things in every culture. We don’t want the German culture to disappear. We don’t want French culture to disappear. We don’t want Korean culture to disappear, or Japan, or America, or anywhere.
I think we should be very cautious about having some sort of global mixing pot, because every place will be the same, and there won’t be any unique cultures in the world. Which I think would make the world worse.
So I think we need to preserve these country cultures, and that’s the future that I think is better. I think that most people would agree is better. We shouldn’t have cultures disappear.
And currently, based on the current birth rates and the sort of so-called multiculturalism and globalism, what we’re actually seeing is the dilution of individual cultures and the destruction and death of individual cultures, which I think is terrible for the future.”
I thought this was a joke. Meta now has made 30-50% of software engineers on core teams become data labelers.
Their job is "giving human feedback on AI-generated Github repos" in an org called Agent Data Optimization.
Maybe we are all training data generators after all.
Britain now arrests more people for social media posts than China, Russia, and Turkey combined nearly matching the rest of the top 10 countries combined
Britain really leads the world on these thought crimes
Insane how the UK, which used to be a free country, turned out to be so totalitarian
Europeans and American patriots!
Tomorrow, the courts of my country, France, may decide to send me to prison for daring to say on television that “the main danger to women in France is Black African and Arab immigrant men.”
Meanwhile, my own attacker, a Tunisian migrant, is still at large.
I need your help to generate media pressure and hope to be acquitted.
They cannot silence the truth!
Thank you for your support 💪🏻🇫🇷
It’s the media’s job to scrutinise One Nation.
Unlike the Prime Minister I welcome it.
I’m an elected representative and I should be scrutinised. One Nation is probably the most scrutinised party in the country.
What I won’t stand for is double standards and outright lies from the media.
The Guardian has been caught out purposely manipulating images to make One Nation look “sinister” and now publishing lies.
I will always engage with media in good faith, but the Guardian has proven they are completely biased and won’t provide a balanced view - resorting to lies and manipulation to “get us”.
Media has great power and with that comes great responsibility to make sure their bias doesn’t get in the way of the facts.