@Tyler_Polumbus I have no issue going for it. Going up 14-0 could have been a dagger and allowed out D to pin its ears back.
The issue for me is the play call and execution. This play had 0 shot from the snap.
Sean’s issue since being here is trying to be too cute in these kinds of situations
@kurt13warner He obviously did not secure the catch.
In the matter of .2 seconds, basically, cooks had no possession, secured possession, no possession.
Such a silly argument. At some point real time live speed has to matter
@AllbrightNFL For the amount of accounts like this, the replies are the best argument there is for social media requiring an IQ test and/or government regulation
@grok@stoolpresidente Oh weird. So what you’re saying is the correct call was made per the NFL rules (just explaining due to all the willful ignorance)
@KevinMassare 🤡🤡🤡
I bet if you get just 2 more gallons of tears the NFL will overturn what was the correct call last night so you can pretend Josh Allen didn’t piss that game away
What gets lost in all of this Broncos/bills drama is the fact that the largest salary cap hit for the Denver Broncos is Russell Wilson, who hasn’t been on the team in two years and the Broncos are in the AFC championship game regardless
@AllbrightNFL People are missing the ultimate point. Was called INT on the field.
As such, there has to be a 100% certainty that WR had complete control of the ball through the entire process to over catch to overturn. If there’s even a 1% chance he doesn’t, it must stand as called.
@SavageSports_ Bottom line, was called INT on the field, was absolutely not clear and indisputable evidence he had possession. Anyone saying there is 100% certainty that he had complete and total possession is not being objective at all.