Theharo

[Theharo @Theharo14]

@BcMeggster @bobmackin Ah so you are trolling then. The map is from Trutch’s 1859 survey of the lower Fraser

[Theharo @Theharo14]

@BcMeggster @bobmackin The airport isn’t built on manmade land. It’s on a natural island

[Theharo @Theharo14]

@BcMeggster @bobmackin Sea island has been in the north Fraser since the earliest colonial surveys. No idea where you are getting this idea from

[Theharo @Theharo14]

@BCPoliticsWatch @westernstandard @AmazingZoltan In fairness to the Songhese, just beside there used to be their village site. Seems a reasonable parcel of land to include in a treaty

[Steve Smith @SteveSmith4243]

@unusual_whales The majority will suffer while the rich "worry" about the confidence of consumers.

[Theharo @Theharo14]

@SteveMesa @NextBestPicture Moonlight a parasite are my one two. Not sure of the order

[Theharo @Theharo14]

@KeithEremko @desokell @VancouverSun @TomTSEC I am a Canadian lawyer. I’ve read the case multiple times and I’m very familiar with it and its contents. You show me a paragraph invalidating private fee simple that isn’t some extrapolated potential future worry, rather than what happened in the case

[Theharo @Theharo14]

@KeithEremko @desokell @VancouverSun @TomTSEC Sigh. It doesn’t. It takes careful steps to avoid that conclusion will

[Theharo @Theharo14]

@desokell @KeithEremko @VancouverSun @TomTSEC He is referring to the fact that indefeasibly was held not to prevent a finding of aboriginal title. That says nothing about the claim that the Cowichan sought to invalidate private title, which they did not and which the case clearly says has not occurred.

[Theharo @Theharo14]

@desokell @KeithEremko @VancouverSun @TomTSEC I don't care what Thomas Isaac has to say. I care about what the actual case says.

[Theharo @Theharo14]

@KeithEremko @VancouverSun @TomTSEC The finding of Aboriginal title in the case in relation to private lands is only associated with the requested remedy of a Crown duty to negotiate in good faith. There is no ask at all for the court to declare those titles invalid. People are like you are making this up.

[Theharo @Theharo14]

@KeithEremko @VancouverSun @TomTSEC Where though? The Cowichan never sought to challenge the validity of private title (other than the City of Richmonds - who obtained title by operation of statute from BC). The judge expressly says that private title isn't invalidated or disturbed.

[Theharo @Theharo14]

@desokell @KeithEremko @VancouverSun @TomTSEC The Cowichan never sought to invalidate private title as part of the case, the judge never said it was invalidated, in fact she said it continues to be valid. I'm genuinely confused how you arrive at your conclusion. There is nothing in the case that supports it.

[Theharo @Theharo14]

@desokell @KeithEremko @VancouverSun @TomTSEC Your reference refers to a summary of Richmond's argument where the judge expressly notes: "The Cowichan have not made a claim for return of land from non-parties and the property rights of the private landowners are not undermined."

[Theharo @Theharo14]

@KeithEremko @VancouverSun @TomTSEC It specifically doesn’t invalidate title.

[Theharo @Theharo14]

@ryanchernesky @marissenmark Then you should fire your lawyers because clearly they didn’t read the ruling carefully

[Theharo @Theharo14]

@BongSim_Psy @marissenmark This is hard to read and almost entirely wrong

[Theharo @Theharo14]

@Snakeysnakey7 @0xtechnerd @MikeGrinnell_ Fair, I’m not sure about how things are done in PA. In Canada, you don’t go to jail for winning a bar fight

[Theharo @Theharo14]

@0xtechnerd @MikeGrinnell_ He won’t be jailed and most teams will still take him

[Theharo @Theharo14]

@puckempire You can’t go to a bar and call a hockey player’s mom a whore and not expect to get punched in the face