John Travis 🇮🇳

[John Travis 🇮🇳 @TheJohnTravis]

@TheLegateIN And what about China

[The White House @WhiteHouse]

President Donald J. Trump on the United States military combat operations in Iran:

[John Travis 🇮🇳 @TheJohnTravis]

@kittyobero61900 @Vineetasinghsng @GalgotiasGU I somewhere read that she has been fired.. fiasco of disproportionate orders.. she by herself cannot have talked on 350cr investment.. they were definitely trying to play foul, but got caught..

[John Travis 🇮🇳 @TheJohnTravis]

@RealNavdeep @ddbhaiya @AdityaRajKaul We may argue all the pros and cons of US and judge outcomes, but it's a fact that US is and will be the single superpower for foreseeable future. Even China, which claims that it is a unicorn by itself, is still nowhere close.

[John Travis 🇮🇳 @TheJohnTravis]

@ddbhaiya @AdityaRajKaul Tariffs curb export since the ones purchasing will seek alternate sources to buy their stuff

[John Travis 🇮🇳 @TheJohnTravis]

@singh35108 @Brahamvakya Exactly.. we all know about dependency on US. So, why was all the chest thumping of being vishwaguru happening earlier.. should have kept mouth shut.

[John Travis 🇮🇳 @TheJohnTravis]

@Arvisharma19 @AdityaRajKaul @ndtv Genuinely curious.. why is Pakistan name not showing up in any of the entries? All that can be seen is "Republic of" which makes no sense.

[John Travis 🇮🇳 @TheJohnTravis]

@Nher_who Aladdin news or aladeen news situation 😅

[John Travis 🇮🇳 @TheJohnTravis]

@KreatelyMedia Source: trust me bro😓

[John Travis 🇮🇳 @TheJohnTravis]

@CPRGuv @narendramodi Your profile pic and cover photo says a lot about what changes you're about to bring.. enjoy your retirement services, LOL!

[John Travis 🇮🇳 @TheJohnTravis]

@imFizaKh @BRICSinfo Pakistan is radicalised a lot and in news for all wrong reasons, so any country will be reluctant.

Also better efficiency based on what? Amid all gung ho, reality is both countries are more or less same when it comes to human dev. .

[𝕽𝖆𝖏𝖊𝖊𝖛 𝕾𝖎𝖓𝖌𝖍 @phoenixxxxxz]

@_protagonist1 The answer is that the straightforward Indian government should be blamed for all the loss of jets First they forbade Indian Jets from entering Pakistan and secondly, they informed Pakistani counterparts before the Indian attack so that they could be prepared
This is sedition

[John Travis 🇮🇳 @TheJohnTravis]

@utggondal You also forgot to mention the battalion lost in Gujarat sector.

[John Travis 🇮🇳 @TheJohnTravis]

@Incognito_qfs Saw another similar post.. doesnt really seem like coincidence. What's happening I wonder?

[Moana @ladynationalist]

how conveniently he missed the Chinnaswamy stampede point

[John Travis 🇮🇳 @TheJohnTravis]

@PKMKB_12 @theskindoctor13 10 minutes? As per reports The incident happened in mere seconds

[John Travis 🇮🇳 @TheJohnTravis]

@iArpitSpeaks The blame should go to Nehru!

[John Travis 🇮🇳 @TheJohnTravis]

@scriptor_soul @akku92 @airindia @flyingbeast320 @aajtak @ndtv @Boeing_In AI 171 is flight code, it changes depending on the route assigned for aircraft. A unique identifier for aircraft is it's registration number.

[John Travis 🇮🇳 @TheJohnTravis]

@sidhant BUT WHY??

[Pratik Sinha @free_thinker]

Some questions to ponder about the present strikes on Pakistan on 7 May, 2025 vs the one in Balakot on 26 Feb, 2019.

1) Last time, it was claimed that 300 people died in the strike. Yet, not a single image or video of a dead person or a funeral emerged from Pakistan—not even a photo of an injured person. This time, however, there are numerous images of the injured and deceased, as well as footage of funerals.

2) In 2019, there were no videos of damaged buildings. This time, there are many such videos, including late-night footage of people capturing the strike sites immediately afterwards. No such footage was available in 2019.

3) After Balakot, the Indian Air Force did not present satellite imagery showing conclusive before-and-after visuals. This time, they presented detailed imagery clearly showing the impact of the strikes. In fact, post-Balakot, all open-source satellite imagery indicated that our bombs had missed the intended targets.

4) Following the Balakot strike, all credible foreign media outlets reported that the intended targets were not hit. This time, they are reporting from within the affected sites, showing the extent of the damage.

5) In 2019, despite our claim of 300 casualties, Pakistan’s response was relatively measured. The day after, on 27 February 2019, Pakistani aircraft entered Indian airspace and struck a few targets, reportedly causing no human casualties. In the ensuing aerial skirmish, one of our planes was shot down, and the pilot was captured and later returned.
This time, even though we are claiming around 100 casualties—less than in 2019—Pakistan’s military response has been significantly more escalated than it was then.

These questions are important to reflect on because the Balakot strike was one of the key issues in the 2019 Lok Sabha elections. It highlights how, when a political party captures the media, almost any story can be sold to the public.