Cancel Roadster, Save Cybertruck. I’m here because Elon discontinued the Cybertruck. Autonomy + manual driving is the future. Not one or the other. 🇺🇸🏳️🌈
“Life cannot just be about solving one miserable problem after another. There need to be things that inspire you, that make you glad to wake up in the morning.” -Elon
https://t.co/tw8GzE0pGp
No. You’re not understanding what I’m saying. There’s still a point to limiting it to 80%. It has little to nothing to do with complete pack failure.
It has to do with degradation. Meaning, you’re degrading the total capacity at a faster and worse rate. You run a significant risk of not getting the same amount of miles out of full charge as someone else who caps their charging at 80% when they don’t need a 100% charge. So when you reach 5 years in you’re getting much worse battery life than somone else who did cap it at 80%. That’s why Tesla and others warn you to not use 90%-100% daily.
An open offer to Tesla: We fully support putting Cybercab first, and we’d be glad to take the Cybertruck line off your hands.
We’d fund it with a consortium of investors and run it at no cost to Tesla’s floor space, headcount, or focus. All of that goes to Cybercab. Cybercab gets first call on battery cells too. We’ll wait our turn.
Tesla gains incremental profit: a license fee, plus FSD and Robotaxi network revenues on every vehicle built.
We’d build the Cybertruck, a three-row CyberSUV, and an unmanned CyberCargo hauler. More autonomous miles, across every surface of this planet and beyond.
Worth a conversation?
@jaywoof_@slye You said “that’s why I use it and don’t baby it and set it at 90%-100% and just go” but Andy had a battery failure. I was pointing out that you don’t set the max % as a means of preventing failure necessarily but rather preventing significant degradation over the life of the car.
@elonmusk We need to save @cybertruck please consider @UnpluggedTesla proposal and allow them to become the AMG of Tesla so the cyber legacy can live on!