Good luck. We've been asking him for that for 7 months. He doesn't even have to give up the analyst. All he has to do is show the raw video he gave to the analyst. Simple. I know what video he used. None of it is useful enough to do an accurate gait analysis without a live subject, that's why he'll never show it.
Lol. Baker showing an article he wrote as his evidence of a gait analysis matcb is beyond ridiculous. It's "trust me, bro" on top of "trust what I previously said too, bro" on top of "trust all of these rainbow sticks that someone else did, bro" without any outside evidence or an expert to back it up. There's a circle of 7 total people that originated this hoax and any and all "evidence" they have is circular.
Baker has never once shown the forensic gait analysis, analyst or the video he used to obtain it. Not once has he explained how it was done or the controls used to obtain it. Therefore, it doesn't really exist or have any evidentiary value. He blocks everyone or anyone that asks for it or doesn't fall in line with his supposition and hearsay.
We're all well aware that forensic gait analysis is used for different purposes, it's just that Baker doesn't have any gait analysis whatsoever for anyone to see or analyze. He won't provide the analysis or the analyst. He won't take it for a secondary analysis because he knows it will fail.
To be specific, he said "attempting to grift." Most people realize that everything Baker says is BS. That's why he's never going to get to the grift target number of 250k. Plus, every dollar of that is going to go to @ClareLockeLLP and SK, so I hope people keep donating.
He lost his job because everyone told him he had no actual evidence but he refused to listen. Every singke time someone tried to tell him that, he twisted it into another conspiracy theory just to continue the grift. He's like 17 layers in on his conspiracy theories. Now he's bringing up the Oath Keepers to deflect from the lack of evidence he has in his crazy conspiracy theory that someone else planted the J5 bombs. I'm able to keep track of all of his lies and omissions. I've already given a few uncontested examples.
You'd be better off asking Steve to provide an iota of direct evidence of his gait analysis, Cole's actual foot size, and every other piece of hearsay he's regurgitating that he has no actual evidence of.
Ask him what happened to his earlier evidence and reporting that the bomber was wearing headphones, and the bomber had squeaky shoes. He stopped reporting everything that he previously had that confirmed it was Cole after he targeted an innocent person.
Ask him how he's now sure it was Cole's vehicle getting on 395 when the bombs were being placed but in January he wasn't sure at all if it was Cole's car because the video and lighting wasn't clear enough to determine with any certainty.
Some of us see the scam Baker is running because we have a lifetime of experience in this field, and others (like you, apparently) are too warped into his conspiracy theories to see the light.
https://t.co/wH9iJxuLtC
Cool story about Nike Air Max Speed Turfs, but what happened to the "squeaky, worn out Nikes" that you, @SteveBakerUSA and @accabbat used to talk about last year and why isn't anything about them being worn out in this "shoe size" story? Those are some important details you left out. Did that research about "worn out shoes" that you guys did get scrubbed after Cole, Jr. confessed to owning the same Nike Air Max Speed Turfshoes and discarding them because "they were old and they were coming apart." ???
From Brian Cole, Jr.'s Court Documents:
"...when the defendant was shown a picture of a Nike Air Max Speed Turfshoe, he admitted that he “used to have a pair” and stated that he “threw them away” because “they were old and they were coming apart.”"
How would Brian Cole, Jr. know that the shoes were old and falling apart if he didn't plant the bombs and it's not him on video planting them with the squeaky shoes on J5? Do you no longer report on it because it destroys your narrative and your grift?
There are more examples of you guys hiding and withholding "evidence" that you have in order to sell your fake narrative and fool your audience, this is just one example.
Steve Baker, on a podcast in January 2026, about the vehicle getting on 395 that he now claims is Cole's:
"In terms of the actual vehicle itself it would be absolutely inappropriate for us to say with absolute certainty 100% that that automobile that we see at 8:03:25, whatever it was, literally driving straight into the cell phone tower where it pings the minute or so before that and then we see it turning on to Interstate 395 and departing the area Can we say with absolute certainly certainty that that was Brian Cole's car? No, we can't because because of the nature of the lighting and the camera angles we can't see who's driving it."
Lol. You like falling into traps today.
The headphones part was actually @stevebakerusa and @accabbat reporting it over a year ago. But they don't tell you about that anymore. See, it doesn't fit their narrative or their suspect and it incriminates Cole even more than he's already incriminated. That's the shell game they're playing with their gullible audience, like you.
They know the bomber had "something wrapped around their neck." As it turns out, Cole is a habitual headphone wearer and was apparently wearing them while he planted the bombs on J5. Ask THEM directly why they stopped reporting this stuff or why they no longer include it in any stories, not me. They'll probably block you if you start showing them their own contradicting evidence. That's what they did with me.
Just like their reporting on the "squeaky shoes" that were worn out. That also disappeared from their reporting after Cole, Jr. admitted, in his confession, to having the exact Nikes but threw them away because they were worn out. How would Cole know they were worn out (as only reported by Baker/Armitas) if it wasn't him planting the bombs on J5???
@FXRegan@ThomasAnde62572@kelzo90@carie_boyce@HeyMattM@SteveBakerUSA I like how they're always trying to show Cole's feet with that body cam pic and they don't realize that they're showing the exact body structure, physique and posture of the J5 bomber (Cole) when he was on South Capitol Street. 🤣
🤣Reminds me of the Desantis boots. Lol. Here's what the experts said about those:
"The toe spring — a technical shoemaking term for how the toes curl up — is also much more pronounced than normal, says Ebner, suggesting to the bootmaker that DeSantis’ toes are too far back in the boot and there’s nothing inside to hold them down."
Cool story about Nike Air Max Speed Turfs, but what happened to the "squeaky, worn out Nikes" that you, @SteveBakerUSA and @accabbat used to talk about last year and why isn't anything about them being worn out in this "shoe size" story? Those are some important details you left out. Did that research about "worn out shoes" that you guys did get scrubbed after Cole, Jr. confessed to owning the same Nike Air Max Speed Turfshoes and discarding them because "they were old and they were coming apart." ???
From Brian Cole, Jr.'s Court Documents:
"...when the defendant was shown a picture of a Nike Air Max Speed Turfshoe, he admitted that he “used to have a pair” and stated that he “threw them away” because “they were old and they were coming apart.”"
How would Brian Cole, Jr. know that the shoes were old and falling apart if he didn't plant the bombs and it's not him on video planting them with the squeaky shoes on J5? Do you no longer report on it because it destroys your narrative and your grift?
There are more examples of you guys hiding and withholding "evidence" that you have in order to sell your fake narrative and fool your audience, this is just one example.
Lol. You like falling into traps today.
The headphones part was actually @stevebakerusa and @accabbat reporting it over a year ago. But they don't tell you about that anymore. See, it doesn't fit their narrative or their suspect and it incriminates Cole even more than he's already incriminated. That's the shell game they're playing with their gullible audience, like you.
They know the bomber had "something wrapped around their neck." As it turns out, Cole is a habitual headphone wearer and was apparently wearing them while he planted the bombs on J5. Ask THEM directly why they stopped reporting this stuff or why they no longer include it in any stories, not me. They'll probably block you if you start showing them their own contradicting evidence. That's what they did with me.
Just like their reporting on the "squeaky shoes" that were worn out. That also disappeared from their reporting after Cole, Jr. admitted, in his confession, to having the exact Nikes but threw them away because they were worn out. How would Cole know they were worn out (as only reported by Baker/Armitas) if it wasn't him planting the bombs on J5???