★Jeeper★ - Red Blooded American - "If" by Rudyard Kipling - Never back down to the tyrants destroying the Republic under God! - Truth Researcher/Seeker/Finder!
It's imperative to understand we have always been a Constitutional REPUBLIC! Never allow DemonicRats/RINO's to lead you into believing we are anything less! They need that brainwashing to implement their Demonocracy/Bureaucracy Socialist/Marxism indoctrination! Get Educated!
🚨AMAZING
They load our food, air, and water with chemicals… that’s “okay”? But the second someone mentions borax? They warn you not to consume it. What if this simple mineral actually helps with arthritis, osteoporosis, parasites, insomnia, and more?
@MrWhiplash_ The Russia/PP tape hoax with Killary and Steale, running guns to Mexico, F'Bomba "health" care scam, moved gain of destruction virology labs to Ukraine and Wuhan causing world wide plandemics, corruption in Ukraine with Biden and Mike Carpenter, the list of crimes goes on and on!
Prompt:
"Draft a comprehensive White Paper titled 'The Lawful Jurisdiction of Courts Under Original American Jurisprudence and Natural Law' that establishes the following principles: (1) Courts lack delegated authority to create rules or interpret law under the organic U.S. Constitution; (2) Congress cannot delegate legislative power to the judiciary, violating separation of powers and the Tenth Amendment; (3) Marbury v. Madison is not law and represents judicial usurpation; (4) The Seventh Amendment preserves Common Law jury trials, making the jury—not judges—the final arbiter of controversies; (5) The living man is sovereign under Natural Law and not subject to statutory or court-made rules without consent. Include sections on Constitutional framework, Seventh Amendment analysis, unconstitutionality of court-made rules (e.g., FRCP), rejection of judicial review, Natural Law sovereignty, scriptural/maxim references, Framers’ intent, and practical remedies (e.g., Notices of Fault, objections). Use formal, precise language, cite original sources, and provide actionable templates for lawful resistance. Structure with headings, subheadings, and a logical flow from theory to application. Exclude contractions, informal language, and disclaimers. Prioritize clarity, rigor, and adherence to Natural Law principles."
I tend to be more in favor of “hang for treason” as the remedy. Especially if legislators have a bad habit of passing unjust statutes and tying up courts with constant battles to remain free. Then there is the matter of corrupt statutory courts with corporate administrators presiding.
Robert La Follette
a forgotten hero who forsaw the dark future that lay ahead for the USA, once it lost it's Central Bank
The Last Senator Who Voted Against the Federal Reserve
La Follette was the most prominent voice amongst the 25 senators who voted against the US Fed Bank
Most people have never heard of the Cantillon Effect.
But once you understand it, you’ll see the world of investing differently.
What is it?
In the early 1700s, Richard Cantillon noticed a simple pattern:
When new money enters an economy, it doesn’t reach everyone at once.
And whoever gets it first benefits the most.
Here’s how it works today:
New liquidity enters through the Fed and through bank lending.
Both follow a similar pattern:
→ Markets and large balance sheets get first access
→ Large corporations and well-connected borrowers tap cheap credit next, they invest and expand at today’s prices
→ Asset prices tend to rise as new liquidity chases finite assets
→ Consumer prices often follow
→ Wages rise last, usually after purchasing power has already declined
Fed data shows how lopsided the playing field is:
- The top 10% hold nearly 90% of equities.
- The bottom 50% holds about 1%.
It’s a simple but powerful monetary transmission.
Understanding this won’t change the system.
But it might change how you think about where to store your savings.
For those of you who don't know, I write all about topics like this every week in The Informationist. Last week, we dove deep on this one.
Link in bio if you want to read the full explanation.
The Cantillon Effect reveals how newly created credit moves through an economy; birth certificate securitization reveals what makes that movement possible.
Together, they expose a quiet architecture in which credit is issued first to institutions, assets reprice early, and the cost is ultimately borne by the population, long after the benefit has been captured elsewhere.
The living man/woman is not the first borrower.
An artificial legal estate is created, registered, and treated as collateral. Credit is issued against said estate, then leveraged and expanded.
Inflation is not an accident; it is a transfer mechanism.
Designed so that purchasing power is drawn forward from future labor, while wages lag behind prices.
What appears as economic inequality is, at its root, a matter of jurisdiction and capacity. Losses do not arise because the system is malfunctioning; they arise because presumptions go unchallenged. The flow persists only where identity, status, and obligation remain unexamined.
Wisdom is found in discernment.
One cannot stop the issuance of credit, but one can understand where it flows.
One can understand where its burdens are placed.
One can understand the assumptions under which those burdens are enforced.
The silent extraction can only be interrupted by status.
Awareness restores agency.
A clear understanding of all that was not taught transforms what seems inevitable into something consciously navigable.
"For nothing is secret, that shall not be evident: neither anything hid, that shall not be known, and come to light."
🧐 The Cantillon Effect is in Effect | River.
The Cantillon Effect, where those closest to new money creation gain the most, is fueling modern disparity.
Wealth concentrates among elites while inflation erodes the middle class, creating a system reminiscent of feudalism.
As corporations and billionaires consolidate power, a new digital serfdom emerges...
This is nothing short of a miracle.
Dr John Campbell breaks down the study of an 83yr old woman with stage 4 breast cancer that had metastasised to the liver, spine and bones.
Usually a death sentence.
She took a daily dose of 222mg of FenBen for 8 months. Which normalised her liver enzymes. The tumor marker dropped from 316 to 36.
There was an absence of any abnormal metabolic activity indicative of cancer. Please like, share, and follow my page. Information like this need to be heard and seen by everyone.
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA vs
CLIFF [LAST NAME]
Alleged Defendant
MARION COUNTY COURT HEADING
Alleged Docket No MCC-CR21-987654321
NOTICE & DEMAND
Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD: … — Isaiah 1:18 KJV
No personal consent is granted for court jurisdiction by appearance, and this communication is not to be construed as granting such. Any forced appearance or order is under threat, duress, coercion, and is repugnant to The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America (“Declaration”) of July 4, A.D. 1776 as the first Organic Law of The United States of America.
As a living, breathing, flesh-and-blood man (see Attachment 1, “Declaration of Identity”), hereinafter “I,” “me,” “my,” I make my habitation on the soil of the Sovereign, Free and Independent State of The United States of America, Pennsylvania, hereinafter “Do-Right,” “his,” as I travel on the soil of Pennsylvania located without the exterior boundaries of State of Pennsylvania and United States, did the following, hereinafter “injure me”:
(a) stop me,
(b) exact my signature from me under [THIS] threatening to kidnap me if I didn’t affix it on his alleged Complaint ticket,
(c) take my private automobile against [THIS] held for ransom, and
(d) allegedly charge Alleged Defendant alleged offenses of “No Registration” and “Speeding.”
[Footnotes:]
1 P.L. 97-280, 96 Stat. 1211. The Bible, the Word of God, … the Holy Scriptures … is ‘the rock on which our Republic rests’…
[Additional footnotes 2–10 with “For illustration purposes only” citations regarding Organic Laws, governments as corporations, duress, kidnapping, etc.]
All written law must identify the territory to which it applies. This—territorial jurisdiction—is necessary and must be proven upon demand when interacting with any alleged governmental or quasi-governmental entity or employee (see Attachment 2, “Memorandum of Law”).
I hereby challenge
(a) Do-Right’s alleged jurisdictions—territorial and extraterritorial—to injure me on the soil of Florida as I so travel, and therefore
(b) the alleged authority of the Assistant District Attorney (“A.D.A.”) to prosecute this alleged instant matter.
United States acknowledges that its territorial jurisdiction is limited by virtue of the Organic Laws. These Laws clearly define that United States’ territorial jurisdiction—a United States “property”—includes [is limited to] that territory owned by or otherwise subject to the exclusive legislative jurisdiction of The United States of America, sc. United States territory, in this instance “State of Florida,” NOT Florida.
This Notice and Demand is limited to examining whether or not State of Florida, hereinafter “the State,” can present evidence the State has territorial or extraterritorial jurisdiction over the physical, geographical location where Do-Right did injure me, hereinafter “this location.”
My relationship to Do-Right is an issue of
(a) whether or not this location is on State of Florida (“in this state,” “in the state”) or any other United States territory, and if not,
(b) what purported law that Do-Right acts pursuant to confers his extraterritorial jurisdiction to injure me at this location.
When jurisdiction is challenged, it must be proven before a court may proceed. For illustration purposes only, at least three United States courts concur, viz.:
[Space with “THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK” and “EVEN” highlighted]
1 Stat. 1-22, 51-53.
18 United States Statutes at Large, The Organic Laws of The United States of America…
[Multiple “For illustration purposes only” legal citations continue through point 18.]
“[A] police … officer’s role is ministerial and mechanical …” Gerhardt v. Mares… (emphasis added).
[Multiple long case quotations on jurisdiction, burden of proof, etc.]
Therefore, it would be a trespass against this location for anyone to proceed or attempt to proceed before territorial or extraterritorial jurisdiction is proven.
A claimant has the burden of proof…