@willjohnsonbf1 the validity of your simple question unravels when you consider pratt not making the general election is exactly what bass and raman didn’t want to happen. both would destroy pratt, and now both have to spend a lot of money and effort to run a very competitive campaign.
@BretWeinstein both raman and bass would prefer to face pratt in the general election for an easy win. yet you want people to believe dems rigged the election to prevent that from happening? are you dumb?
@lakeboating2021@GerryCallahan all three los angeles mayoral candidates wanted pratt to be in the general election. yet the democrats rigged a primary to keep him out? hilarious.
@ksorbs you think either democrat wants to face the other in the general? even an idiot knows that either democrat wanted pratt. in fact, all three candidates wanted pratt in the general. only certifiable morons and disingenuous hacks think that this election’s outcome was manipulated.
@SteveKrak so raman is stealing the election? instead of ensuring a raman v pratt general election (which she’d easily win), she’s ensuring a raman v bass general election (which she’d likely lose). how does this make sense to you?
@ZeekArkham so, we’re expected to believe that dems in los angeles stole a primary election to exclude a repub when their dem vs repub general election would be a landslide victory. they stole an election to create a dem vs dem toss up rather than have a dem vs repub landslide? are you dumb?
@GerryCallahan here’s the problem. why would the “democratic machine” want two democrats running in the general election of a predominantly democratic city? if the “machine” stole an election, pratt would have easily advanced.
@JustineBateman brilliant move to have the established, progressive city councilwoman run against the established, liberal mayor.
imagine orchestrating an election against a conservative reality d-list celebrity whereas the left would coalesce against him. that would have been super dumb, yeah?