@zarahussain999 Blood is on the hands of those that encourage and allow it to continue: French government, British government, facilitators in France, facilitators in Britain, incl. RNLI, and those like you.
Heartbreak is for accidents, not those choosing to put themselves at risk
๐จ MEET LABOUR MINISTER JENNY RIDDELL CARPENTER WHO THINKS PUBS AND DOGS ARE FAR RIGHT!
Look closely at the face in this photo to understand how much the Westminster ruling class despises ordinary British life.
This is the actual Nature Minister in charge of rural affairs, representing Suffolk Coastal while actively waging ideological war on village culture:
*Confessed on camera that she lies awake at night terrified of traditional country pubs, pints of ale, and pet black labradors.
*Publicly smeared centuries of English rural heritage as a dangerous far right fantasy that never really existed.
*Backs Rachel Reeves and her brutal twenty percent inheritance tax raid designed to drive multi generational family farms into bankruptcy.
*Supports punitive business taxes and green levies that are forcing two local British pubs to close their doors forever every single day.
Labour politicians do not just want to tax you into poverty, they genuinely despise your traditions, your pets, and your local community.
How on earth did an urban snob who hates the countryside this much get put in charge of British nature?
Retweet this immediately to expose Jenny Riddell Carpenter and show every rural voter in Britain the contempt running Whitehall. ๐ฌ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๐ฅ
@BLAIMGame Nope. Unrealistic cheer leaders prommising everything can be solved by taxing.
Ironically, it may lower 'net' immigration, but only by persuading those that can to leave the UK.
@belloinuwa@JuliaHB1 Sadly, it is truth that pushed him to this.
Cambridge University were exploitative, and so lacking in basic common sense that they didn't see the risk of this outcome. Blinded by DEI at all costs.
Terrible for his children. But doesn't make it anyone else's responsibility.
@narindertweets@andyburnham People, don't fuel gaslighting grifter that is @narindertweets by replying.
If Arday story is about race, it's how fuelled by DEI, he was able to get ahead of more worthy candidates simply by being willing to make more extravagant claims that were not subject to due diligence.
Jason Ardayโs death is tragic. But please spare us the sanctimonious complaints that he was merely an โobscureโ academic who was the victim of a racist witch-hunt. The probing and questioning and exposure were entirely legitimate.
Arday was plainly guilty of plagiarism. He had also made a series of fantastical claims about his life and career. He ended up being appointed as a professor at one of the worldโs most august seats of learning โ where his students, who had worked extremely hard to get there, were paying large fees for the privilege of being taught by him.
Far from being obscure, Arday had happily engaged with the media over many years, often repeating his false claims. He appeared on numerous TV shows and guest edited Radio 4โs flagship Today programme. He even carried the Olympic torch.
Moreover, he had secured a major publishing deal for his autobiography, which was set to be released in Britain and the US just as the scandal broke. By no measure was this man โobscureโ.
When a fellow academic in Plymouth began to question his credentials, Arday (or someone close to him) made a complaint to the police. When a journalist from Times Higher Education started investigating, he was subjected to a police inquiry and also received a threatening letter from the leading libel solicitors, Carter Ruck.
Arday and those around him were clearly not averse to hounding others when they felt like it.
Itโs very possible that Arday did not have sufficient support measures in place when he was finally exposed โ but thatโs on others. The investigation and questions amounted to legitimate journalistic inquiry.
This was never just about Ardayโs fabulism. It was also about the increasingly controversial philosophy of DEI, the obsession of our political, corporate and educational institutions with pushing that philosophy, and how it might have led to someone with Ardayโs subpar credentials being appointed in the first place.
These are all valid questions to ask โ and, by asking them, journalists are simply doing their jobs.
@HistorianHa I think @chengweilai2 a bot account.
No human would fail to recognise such a very poor attempt at grifting and gaslighting.
I recommend blocking to avoid accidently reading its rubbish output
@AdamSinger81@DKLarge2 @ChengWeiLai2 Eddie Izzard didn't keep his achievement secret. He had medical support and live GPS tracking. He didn't nhave a broken leg'.
Fundraising achievements not normally kept secret.
So why no-one coming forward to corroborate Ardays 30 marathons?
@AdamSinger81@DKLarge2 @ChengWeiLai2 Izzard was apparently supported by several doctors monitoring his health and with live GPS tracking ensuring maximum publicity for good causes.
Rule 1 of fundraising, you make sure the public are aware.
So why is nobody coming forward to corroborate Ardays 30 marathons?