@mattvanswol@BasedMikeLee HYBRID MODEL. They choose the curriculum but you still get to be part of your Childs education. You homeschool on certain days but it's is a very good option for parents stepping into homeschooling.
@CandaceOwensPod Bro….this just CONFIRMED the crazy ex allegations. The amount of time this took to watch all her content to make this…not the win you thought it was😬 this has moved to obsession
@RealCandaceO Is it really that hard to just admit “I WAS WRONG” and the metadata aligned with his statements? You purposely wrote this and rather than addressing the metadata, you left it out completely, and then ended by blaming him for not responding? Narcissism 101 folks..
Watching Candace Owens demand that people hand over their phone metadata to “prove innocence” is . . . childish.
You don’t get to float serious accusations or insinuations without evidence and then flip the burden of proof by saying:
“Give me your private data or you’re hiding something.”
That’s not journalism.
That’s not investigation.
That’s circular reasoning
Refusing to surrender personal metadata doesn’t imply guilt . . . it implies boundaries.
Privacy isn’t suspicious just because it’s inconvenient to an unproven narrative.
And here’s the problem with that logic:
Someone could accuse Candace of taking money from Andrew Tate’s webcam business in exchange for that softball, PR massage interview she gave him on her old podcast …
And then demand she release her bank statements and every private text she has ever exchanged with him to “prove” she didn’t.
And if she doesn’t release that information, it PROVES she’s hiding something. 🧐
Candace Logic:
“My theory is correct because the proof exists somewhere, and the fact that I don’t have it proves someone is hiding it.”
Grow up.
Watching Candace Owens demand that people hand over their phone metadata to “prove innocence” is . . . childish.
You don’t get to float serious accusations or insinuations without evidence and then flip the burden of proof by saying:
“Give me your private data or you’re hiding something.”
That’s not journalism.
That’s not investigation.
That’s circular reasoning
Refusing to surrender personal metadata doesn’t imply guilt . . . it implies boundaries.
Privacy isn’t suspicious just because it’s inconvenient to an unproven narrative.
And here’s the problem with that logic:
Someone could accuse Candace of taking money from Andrew Tate’s webcam business in exchange for that softball, PR massage interview she gave him on her old podcast …
And then demand she release her bank statements and every private text she has ever exchanged with him to “prove” she didn’t.
And if she doesn’t release that information, it PROVES she’s hiding something. 🧐
Candace Logic:
“My theory is correct because the proof exists somewhere, and the fact that I don’t have it proves someone is hiding it.”
Grow up.
@RealCandaceO You forgot the part where you say:”Sorry, I was wrong and lead millions of individuals to assassinate a mans character for no reason.”
All because he didn't reply to princess quickly enough. Jus a reminder, some peoples lives don't revolve around 24-7 X drama like @RealCandaceO
@EvanAKilgore@Heather13588376 Quietly sitting back watching this entire thing unfold. I have been a Candace fan for years but the narcissistic behavior and gaslighting towards anyone who disagrees with her is grotesque. @evan you gained a new follower. Many people are on your side. This is getting insane.
My response to @RealCandaceO:
I was not at Ft. Huachuca on 9/8 or 9/9. I’ve never been.
I was home in Nashville both days. On the afternoon of the 8th, I attended an ultrasound with my wife and stopped to get balloons for a gender reveal with our son that evening. It’s a boy if anyone was wondering!
The following morning, I was at work as usual.
Here are photos and surveillance footage below to “prove my whereabouts.”
Go touch some grass, folks. You are being lied to.
Actually, @LauraLoomer she DOES speak for a portion of the MAGA/Trump base.
More critically, she is the undeniable voice for the majority of the younger conservative generation: the generation fed up with the Zionist-driven lobbyist-controlled corruption of this government.
Believe it or not, the young conservatives don’t look at Gaza and think “a byproduct of war” we think “a planned genocide of a people group”
We don’t listen to the talking points, we let the FACTS talk. The facts are stacked against the Netanyahu government. They are up against a wall and outrages like this prove it.
I literally had THIS EXACT SAME conversation with someone within the past hour.
It’s coming, it’s here, and it’s unpreventable. It’s being allowed on purpose. Watch as digital “IDs” begin to roll out and be pushed as the “solution”. It’s all part of the larger-scale push to mass identification. Bookmark this.
It’s heartbreaking.
I am fiercely pro-Jewish, but undoubtedly anti-Nentenyahus government. And many young conservatives hold my conviction. However, when you label anyone who disagrees with the Netanyahu government as an “antisemite” like @LauraLoomer does, it pushes a generation into the true antisemitic camp because they feel like they are getting attacked by the very PEOPLE they once defended.
Stop attacking people for calling out the corruption of a foreign government!! Or you will lose an entire generation on the Israel issue.
Bookmark This. I hope I’m wrong .
It’s hard not to see the hypocrisy here. @LauraLoomer if you are concerned about a foreign nation funneling in money to promote their agenda within the US, you in fact should be just as concerned about any other foreign governments who do the same….
Please tell me you see the hypocrisy here.
The hypocrisy is staggering: these people are more worried about silencing @RealCandaceO than anyone in the Kirk family.
Candace was clear: if Erika Kirk wanted her to stop, she would stop. Erika's silence isn't grief; it's a profound statement. It is a tacit endorsement.
I won't accept the 'grieving widow' defense. She knows the truth. She knew her husband. There is video evidence of Charlie Kirk, just weeks before his death, explicitly saying, 'Candace is a good friend' and protecting her.
@DBrodyReports, why the panic?
If Candace comes forward with evidence that Charlie was done defending Israel, and was even planning to bring Candace back to TPUSA less than 48 hours before his death, you, sir, will have a serious reckoning on your hands.
The hypocrisy is staggering: @pastorlocke is more worried about silencing @RealCandaceO than anyone in the Kirk family.
Candace was clear: if Erika Kirk wanted her to stop, she would stop. Erika's silence isn't grief, it's a profound statement. It is a tacit endorsement.
I won't accept the 'grieving widow' defense. She knows the truth. She knew her husband. There is video evidence of Charlie Kirk, just weeks before his death, explicitly saying, 'Candace is a good friend' and protecting her. Look it up for YOURSELF. Don't believe what they are telling you.
@pastorlocke, why the panic?
If Candace comes forward with evidence that Charlie was done defending Israel, and was even planning to bring her back to TPUSA less than 48 hours before his death, you, sir, will have a serious reckoning on your hands.