π¨ There is now one rape or attempted rape reported in Glasgow around every 18 hours.
New figures show almost 500 cases were recorded in the city in the last year, with sexual crimes overall up 20% over the past five years.
Read the full story β¬οΈ
Finding differences with each other is easy.
We should all rejoice in Christ, contend for truth with charity, and turn our attention to spreading the gospel to the lost.
On secondary matters, we may disagree strongly and still recognise one another as brothers and sisters in Christ.
Sproul and Graham disagreed profoundly on aspects of soteriology, yet Sproul could still speak of Graham with deep affection and humility.
Truth matters. Doctrine matters. But so does remembering who the real enemy is.
We are not saved by having every theological category perfectly arranged.
We are saved by Christ.
Back in the day RC Sproul was asked if he would see Billy Graham in heaven because they disagreed via Calvinism/ Arminianism
He simply said βnoββ¦.and let that sit while people processed it
Then he said:
βbecause he will be so near to the throne and I will be so far I may not get a glimpse of him!β
This is the attitude we need in these disagreements. There are rabids on both sides, and itβs just not necessary.
βGod saves as many people as He possibly canβ πππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππ
βUnbelievably bad theology.β
Then your problem is not with John Piper.
Your problem is with Paul.
βFor the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth...β (Romans 9:11 KJV)
Before Jacob and Esau were born.
Before either had done good or evil.
Godβs purpose according to election already stood.
Paul then continues:
βJacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.β (Romans 9:13)
And he immediately anticipates the objection:
βWhat shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness with God? God forbid.β (Romans 9:14)
Why would Paul even need to answer the charge of injustice if he were merely teaching that God looked ahead and chose people based on what they would freely decide?
He continues:
βI will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion.β (Romans 9:15)
Then comes the conclusion:
βSo then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy.β (Romans 9:16)
Not of human willing.
Not of human effort.
But of God who has mercy.
And lest anyone think election is based on foreseen merit, Paul says elsewhere that God:
βHath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world.β (Ephesians 1:4)
And:
βHaving predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will.β (Ephesians 1:5)
According to what?
Our future decision?
Our foreseen faith?
Our goodness?
No.
βAccording to the good pleasure of his will.β
Again:
βBeing predestinated according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will.β (Ephesians 1:11)
Paul even tells Timothy that God:
βHath saved us, and called us with an holy calling, not according to our works, but according to his own purpose and grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus before the world began.β (2 Timothy 1:9)
So yes.
Before you were born.
Before you had done anything good or evil.
Before the foundation of the world.
Godβs electing purpose stood.
You can dislike Piperβs wording if you want.
But βmark and avoidβ Romans 9, Ephesians 1, and 2 Timothy 1?
That may prove considerably more difficult.
2 signs that your nation is under Godβs judgment.
Your nation is ruled by foreigners.
(Deut. 28:43)
Your nation is ruled by women.
(Isaiah 3:12)
We are a nation under judgement.
May God grant us repentance.
Restore Britain should run on introducing βnative rightsβ for White British people. The English, Scottish, Northern Irish and Welsh.
Whilst it pains me to endorse the politics of victimhood, it is the best way, in my opinion, to get through the most pro-White policy with the least resistance when we enter parliament.
The right to self determination, land rights, anti-DEI laws, compensation.
These are the first steps towards regaining our sovereignty.
There is no such thing as Islamism.
They're talking about Islam.
An "Islamist" is just a practising Muslim.
Their book tells them to conquer and rape and oppress.
They don't belong here.
Christ is King βοΈ
PINK LADIES OF SCOTLAND π΄σ §σ ’σ ³σ £σ ΄σ Ώ LOOK π they are demonstrating AGAINST us. Against MOTHERS who donβt want their CHILDREN RAPED !
Shout out to the SCUMBAG LEFTY RAPE APOLOGISTSβ¦ Weβll see you on the 12th ππ»@AntiRacismDay@SUTRScotland