Classic game theory - an incentive to the major players (community) while at the same time writing vague words like 'clients' and offering to do some things that can only be done if we trust him which is beyond a possibility now.
Over the next couple of days, I am going to write down my thoughts on this proposal, consolidate multiple viewpoints & aim to explain how #prop16 led to one of the most intense discussions and a divided vote with fascinating implications for years to come.
It's almost time for #prop16 voting to end. Have read so many interesting views over the past week.
In the end, I agree with @Core1_official that a better proposal needs to be drafted for the community to provide a benchmark in on-chain crypto governance.
1/3 🧵
We as Core-1 sincerely ask the $JUNO community to down-vote #prop16.
The text of the proposal was rushed. Parts do not reflect core principals that Juno holds dear. After a period of gathering more information and consulting with the community
👇
@Johnmessy_atom @nodes_smart@ChandraStation@binaryholdings @frensvalidator @diffusion_fi @stakecito@EarthValidator@QuantumNodeIo Snapshot was supposed to be in Feb. If you were staking ATOM/OSMO/AKASH/JUNO then you should be eligible. There will be bonuses if you were staking with certain validators at the time of snapshot.
A thread 🧵on 'validator specific' #airdrops in #Cosmos -- my views on such airdrops, a list of some validators I stake with, and planned airdrop info for some of them.
First, my views...
1/15)
#CosmosEcosystem#ATOM#JUNO#OSMO
@360bilalkhan @Disperze_@keplrwallet I see... they should have communicated on Twitter at least given that they are doing a network upgrade. I need to get onto their discord now, haha. Thanks!
@Disperze_ getting network error when trying to access https://t.co/PCkU8NBKvH
Also, trying to claim rewards via @keplrwallet shows "pubkey doesn't match signer address".
Any idea what's going on? Thanks!