The people who spent ten years following the 2016 election claiming Trump won because of Russia collusion would like you to stop questioning the LA mayor race.
I’ve referred these allegations to DOJ’s new Fraud Division for criminal investigation. Minnesota state officials are not above the law, and if they facilitated fraud, lied under oath about what they knew, or harassed and intimated whistleblowers, they must face justice.
Saying that the Supreme Court “committed violence” in its ruling, which you disagree with for political reasons, is exactly the type of hyperbolic rhetoric that has put several of the justices in harm’s way.
We’re still waiting on the NYT to report on the swatting incident at Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s home...
Part of what's hard about beating the Democrats is that their policy initiatives are so bizarre that it's hard to persuade normies that we aren't making them up
My most black-pilled thought is we won’t have this same country 100 years from now because there’s no long-term future for any country where half the citizens hate the place.
You just can’t keep a house when half the residents want to burn it down.
There are good that comes with bad things. Like the communists stealing another election is bad. But them being so brazen about it (cause communists can never control their demonic urges) is bringing this issue into the mainstream. In the long run, that’s a good thing.
This shows 12,350 more votes for the LA mayor race than the high profile California Governor race. If anything you’d expect the opposite, as some people only vote for Governor but skip local races. The reverse is absurd. California elections seem as trustworthy as North Korea’s.
The Save America Act isn't going to pass. Fine.
The simplest remedy for California's third-world elections is to simply refuse to seat any members of their House caucus who weren't ahead on Election Day.
No new legislation needed. No Senate consent needed.