@Abba_Annabelle@LumberLaw Maybe if the prosecution presented any evidence he was hit by a car, I would agree with you. As it stands, I don’t think anyone can really know what happened and the only that is clear is that she has to be found not guilty.
@Torettos@Leopardo8 I think that would be a bad thing overall. If you ask the jury midway through if there is reasonable doubt and they say no, they are more likely to anchor to that opinion at the end of the trial.
@ScottStories If Hershey’s containing the word “she” is something you can’t unsee and it somehow ruins the chocolate for you…I think you are the problem, not Hershey’s
@MrsHoegLaw I am so, so happy that you can feel the support and take comfort! I know this must be so difficult to deal with and we all want the best for you and your family ❤️
@kageorge_13@HustusMichael You don’t want that to be the rule, because it will lead to more situations like this. People will refuse to acknowledge symptoms knowing it will get them yanked for 6 weeks, no question. You need better testing that is harder to fool.
@LumberLaw This feels like it falls under “never attribute to malice that which can be reasonably explained by stupidity.” Most journalists are probably not going to realize that “appealed” is correct but “filed an appeal” is not.