This back and forth on Blue vs Red RW is interesting, but it's also frustrating because many seem to get caught up in the text of the argument and not the implications.
The principals involved here almost certainly know this, but all arguments on X are effectively swarm vs swarm, so the particular knowledge of any party is irrelevant to the gestalt knowledge of the swarm. This is my attempt to raise that level.
~The Archetypes~
First, the preconditions:
1. "Red" here indicates the type of RW person produced by an intact and locally hegemonic American culture, while "Blue" indicates the type of RW person produced by a degraded or besieged American culture.
2. Because of this, Blues can emerge in Red States (especially in urban areas) where locally dominated by the progressive monoculture or by hostile diversity or through exposure to Blue memes online conveying the threat level. Simultaneously, Reds can emerge where a locally hegemonic and intact American culture exists, even within a hostile environment. This is most reliably produced by strong church and kin structures. Additionally, there are occasionally sporadic and temperamental Blues and Reds which emerge despite a completely alien environment. However, as a rule: Blue structures produce Blue RWs and Red structures produce Red RWs.
@JNico62@HomericFuturist The OP, is an elite leftist who essentially lives in an ethnostate with all of its benefits while proudly proclaiming herself a hostile, AntiWhite political actor whose goal is to destroy any vestiges of a real (White) America left.
@stoiciticus@WomanDefiner The worst content on the internet is non Whites slurping down copious amounts of processed slop with their fucking mouths open.
You may be wondering why immigrants hate us so much.
After all, they were allowed to come to America, and prosper greatly by doing so, and a large portion of the population bent over backwards to welcome them and make them feel at home.
If you don't understand realpsych, you would expect them to be grateful.
But that's not how people actually work.
Human beings are grateful for gifts and favors only up to the point where they feel they can no longer repay them.
Once that point is passed, once a person can no longer repay his debts, then he has a choice between two narratives for understanding the rest of his life.
"I am a charity recipient, not a self-sustaining human being."
"I was entitled to what I took from those people, because they are bad, or weak, or horrible, or something."
In other words, if you give someone too much, more than they deserve, more than they can possibly earn, they become ungrateful little swine, precisely in order to preserve their own psychological well being.
And they will surround themselves with others who participate with them in that collaborative lie.
Sometimes people can make entire careers out of pandering to the over-privileged and under-deserving. Careers like "publicist". Or "immigration lawyer".
And they will invent an entire mythos to preserve their self-worth. They will convince themselves that thriving off undeserved gifts makes them the elite of humanity, while those whose inheritance was taken from them are some mental stereotype of drunken "Biff", who partied his way through a second rate IT school.
There's just one small problem that they must handwave away or ignore if they can.
Biff's great-grandparents build America into the greatest nation on Earth.
Biff's grandparents won WW2.
Biff's parents invented the internet, and flew astronauts to the moon.
Biff's entire tribe was thriving. Otherwise there would have been nothing to give to immigrants, and no reason for them to come here.
Meanwhile, all of the places that the immigrants are coming from have existed a lot longer than America, and been filled with the ancestors of those immigrants, and lots of other people who are like them in every way.
They had centuries, sometimes millennia, to get their shit together and build something where they were.
They didn't.
They had to go live in someone else's country, for "opportunities".
Of course they have to pretend that they "deserve" those "opportunities" more than the very people whose ancestors created the "opportunities" in the first place.
Because otherwise they would have to admit the one thing their self-esteem could never endure....
Leaving their own nations, and their tribes, was an admission of abject failure.