A Progressive Libertarian

Of the people, by the people, for the people… when the people are morons.

[A Progressive Libertarian @Tiggersdad2]

Just because.

Thank you https://t.co/FRjiMAddGZ

[A Progressive Libertarian @Tiggersdad2]

@Hawkglock1 @Ohitskaykay_St 🤣🤣🤣

[A Progressive Libertarian @Tiggersdad2]

@Hawkglock1 @Ohitskaykay_St With your refusal of basic facts you're essentially asking me to prove Bigfoot doesn't exist. Provide your step by step mechanics for how the tangible data doesn't represent what it purports to and I'll walk you through how you're wrong.

[A Progressive Libertarian @Tiggersdad2]

@Hawkglock1 @Ohitskaykay_St those trades would be FREE money. Why would they ignore free money in favor of open ended risk?

[A Progressive Libertarian @Tiggersdad2]

@Hawkglock1 @Ohitskaykay_St You couldn't be more wrong, though I can't tell if it's because you can't follow the logic or don't want to. You say naked shorts are sUpPrEsSiNg GNS. In the real world that makes no sense. The AMC and reversal cases disprove your claim because if they existed as you claim...1/

[A Progressive Libertarian @Tiggersdad2]

@Hawkglock1 @Ohitskaykay_St in the East are open to interpretation. They're not. I said you wouldn't back up your claims. You didn't disappoint.

[A Progressive Libertarian @Tiggersdad2]

@Hawkglock1 @Ohitskaykay_St You're right. Calling it fraud and grifter nonsense doesn't make what I say right. What makes it right is its accuracy. You're the one who's making claims based on nothing and you've yet to back up any of them other than saying things that are as immutable as the sun rising...1/

[A Progressive Libertarian @Tiggersdad2]

@Hawkglock1 @Ohitskaykay_St buyers have agency and demand is elastic. If what you were claiming was even close to remotely true, there never would've been such a wide and persistent spread in AMC & APR and reversals would NEVER trade at a discount when short seller demand outstripped borrow availability.

[A Progressive Libertarian @Tiggersdad2]

@Hawkglock1 @Ohitskaykay_St Nope. That's a bunch of fraud and grifter nonsense. All made up to circumvent the tangible data that makes your assertions fairytales. What I'm saying is based on tangible data. What you're claiming is based on imagination. Moreover, short sellers don't set price because...1/

[A Progressive Libertarian @Tiggersdad2]

@Hawkglock1 @Ohitskaykay_St There is literally ZERO evidence to support your claims. Moreover, anyone who understands market mechanics immediately recognizes those claims are not only baseless but impossible and make no sense. That’s why, as opposed to me, you’ll provide ZERO evidence to back them up.

[A Progressive Libertarian @Tiggersdad2]

@Hawkglock1 @Ohitskaykay_St By the way, I have plenty more examples.

[A Progressive Libertarian @Tiggersdad2]

@Hawkglock1 @Ohitskaykay_St It is intent. Just like using intangible NAV is misleading. Just like not using pro forma when it’s called for is misleading and just like lying about naked shorts is misleading. I’ve provided evidence to support every one of my statements. You simply refuse to accept the truth.

[A Progressive Libertarian @Tiggersdad2]

@Hawkglock1 @Ohitskaykay_St YOU provided the definition. If you're not willing to abide by what YOU wrote, then bad faith is a statement, not an insult. Income from operations is not a malleable term. If Roger didn't intend to mislead he would've said net income, not net income from operations.

[A Progressive Libertarian @Tiggersdad2]

@Hawkglock1 @Ohitskaykay_St The headline clearly states net income from operations. The body of the PR clearly demonstrates this is misleading using the proper definitions as outlined in your previous tweet. Under bad faith in the dictionary is a picture of you.

[A Progressive Libertarian @Tiggersdad2]

@Hawkglock1 @Ohitskaykay_St It did. It clearly states the "income" came from "debt write offs" and "closure of unprofitable divisions." Both of those are extraordinary items and neither falls under under "operating income." It's right there in your tweet.

[A Progressive Libertarian @Tiggersdad2]

@Hawkglock1 @Ohitskaykay_St 🤣🤣🤣

Awww. What happened? You got scared? You were smart to run away.

[A Progressive Libertarian @Tiggersdad2]

@Hawkglock1 @Ohitskaykay_St Project much? Why are you afraid to answer a simple question? 😂

[A Progressive Libertarian @Tiggersdad2]

@Hawkglock1 @Ohitskaykay_St If you know what it means, tell me, because otherwise you'll just deny what I'm saying even though I'm 100% correct. Define net income from operations. What does it include and what does it exclude?

[A Progressive Libertarian @Tiggersdad2]

@Hawkglock1 @Ohitskaykay_St It is easy to prove but I'm not gonna let you weasel out of it, so answer this question before I point out how Roger is lying.
https://t.co/RGe5goC4mN

[A Progressive Libertarian @Tiggersdad2]

@Hawkglock1 @Ohitskaykay_St Before I answer, let me ask you a question. Do you even know what net income from operations means? It's ok to say you don't but if you do, please provide the definition. At the very least, please detail what items would not fall under net income from operations.

[A Progressive Libertarian @Tiggersdad2]

@Hawkglock1 @Ohitskaykay_St Before I answer, let me ask you a question. Do you even know what net income from operations means? It's ok to say you don't but if you do, please provide the definition. At the very least, please detail what items would not fall under net income from operations.

[A Progressive Libertarian @Tiggersdad2]

@Hawkglock1 @Ohitskaykay_St The PR text contradicts the headline and if you knew what you were talking about or had experience in corporate finance this wouldn't be a discussion.