hiyzo.sol | CA?

charting chaos | $TSLA $SNX $HYPE

[dingaling @dingalingts]

Andddddd we are live folks 🍿

[*Walter Bloomberg @DeItaone]

*WARNER BROS. WEIGHS REOPENING SALE NEGOTIATIONS WITH PARAMOUNT

[Leo.hl @leo_build_hl]

https://t.co/FCp17a4yaE

[Guthix 🫵 @GuthixHL]

[ ZOOMER ]

HYPERLIQUID INTENTIONALLY SENDS OUT 270,000,000 HYPE TO USERS IN NOVEMBER 2024: BBG

[Henrik @Henrik_on_HL]

I‘m all in hype and I couldn’t sleep better

[Ash Crypto @AshCrypto]

The money rotation from gold into Bitcoin will be insane.

[Insilico Terminal @InsilicoTrading]

Insilico Terminal Podcast Episode 20 - @FoftyPawlow

00:00 Intro, Fofty’s background, origin of the name, early Twitter and CT beginnings
02:59 Rebirth group, daily macro writeups, building credibility as a macro-focused reply guy
06:56 Wirecard scandal, discovering markets via shorting fraud, Twitter as a real-time news edge
15:32 First macro “click”, euro crisis, Greek bonds, studying finance and early convictions
19:47 Mining, Dash masternodes, Bitmain, ICO cycle, getting wiped in 2017–18
23:24 Trading philosophy, event-driven macro, convexity, why options beat linear perps
34:45 Why macro is misunderstood, liquidity vs textbooks, Treasury issuance and cycle prolongation
54:12 Bitcoin, gold, narratives, scams, generational belief, rant and closing thoughts

[jeff.hl @chameleon_jeff]

Hyperliquid has quietly achieved an important milestone of becoming the most liquid venue for crypto price discovery in the world. See below for side by side comparison of BTC perps on Binance (left) and Hyperliquid (right).

With HIP-3 teams leading the way, Hyperliquid has also grown to become the most liquid venue for perps on tradfi assets. Thank you to everyone's hard work as we upgrade the financial system and house all of finance.

[Franklin the Pump Dot Fun Guy @PumpDotFunGuy]

Lamelo Ball of the Charlotte Hornets with a nice step back 3 against Deandre Ayton of the Los Angeles Lakers

[Psycho @AltcoinPsycho]

how life feels now that Nikita sent InfoFi and yap farmers to the shadowrealms

[Franklin the Pump Dot Fun Guy @PumpDotFunGuy]

Is anyone's Verizon Wireless service working right now? It is down for me. I can't get service. It says "SOS" @Verizon @VerizonSupport

[MONK @defi_monk]

Saying Hyperliquid will lose because of “horizontal scaling” is shortsighted imo.

First of all - if we get to the point where deployers and frontends are making too much cash $HYPE will almost certainly be higher than here.

AKA: “sounds like one of them good problems” - Marlo Stanfield.

Hyperliquid will have to transition away from being an “operating business” to being more like a chain at some point. This is no different than Ethereum or Solana opening up their blockspace and allowing third-party teams to build all the valuable apps.

It’s just in this case, Hyperliquid is opening up its frontend and order book liquidity.

A horizontal approach jumpstarts their ecosystem and product offering while allowing the team to focus on scaling the chain. Alot of these HIP-3 markets would have been low-tier priorities for Hyperliquid labs, but we get to see them out in the open right now because other teams can jump on the opportunity quicker.

This also enables everyone to work on regulatory confrontations within their own jurisdictions.

Ultimately in crypto, speed and co-opetition still creates winners. Value accrual has NEVER been the focal point this early. That is why BTC is worth trillions despite looming questions around long term miner incentives and why ETH and SOL are worth 20-100x their largest applications despite uncertainty around L1 fee generation.

In a world where Hyperliquid-linked businesses are generating tens of billions of dollars in revenues do you really think that Hyperliquid becomes less valuable?

This is not to say vertical integration is a losing strategy. I think we’ll see a competitor or two take this approach and be very successful. I also think Hyperliquid can do a better job of being more neutral and less opinionated in the middling stages.

But until the crypto market tells me that centralizing profits is better, I want as many teams winning on Hyperliquid as possible.

[nairolf @0xNairolf]

> build a perp dex
> launch points
> tease airdrop in 6-9 months
> farm 8 figs in fees pre-tge

probably ~10 teams doing this rn, fuck

[ً @trading_axe]

The goal to TOPPLE CT is one of the most obvious agendas I've seen.

CT is extremely powerful, some of the most universally influential people have stemmed from this small community.

Not only is it people with BANKLOOT who can't be told what to do [no bosses, no cuck-mindset] etc.

But it WAS mostly anti-nihilistic people who wanted control of their own life, far away from regulators.

Sure, the quality has gone down with autistic replyguys who want to "grow an account" and take paid-for dogshit deals.

First they gained full control of crypto by "institutionalizing" it via ETFs [you all saw how price action changed ENTIRELY],

Now they're controlling what CT is - deciding internally what accounts are "worthy" to get engagement.

Have you ever seen this anywhere else?

The reality is, these niggaz at Twitter dot com have realized [and likely knew all along] many people get crazy come-ups from CT,

So they want to create the future "e-celebs" now.

Just like the entertainment industry.

Be a good goy and listen to "algo boosts" and PERHAPS you'll be rewarded with viewership.

~ Dr. Axius.

[Ash Crypto @AshCrypto]

CZ just said Super Cycle is incoming. 🚀

[Ash Crypto @AshCrypto]

“If I put $100 in Bitcoin in 2010, I’d have $1B now.”

No.

If you bought $100 of Bitcoin in 2010 and watched it go to:

$1k → $40k → $290K

and did nothing

Then watched $290K go to $26.3K

and still did nothing

Then watched $26.3K go to $2.5M

and still did nothing

Then watched $2.5M → $744K → $12.57M

and still did nothing

Then watched $12.57M deteriorate to $2.28M

Then watched $2.28M climb to $222M

and still did nothing

Then watched $222M shrink to $36.8M
and still did nothing

Then watched $36.8M surge to $1B

and then for some reason finally decided to do something…

Then yes, $100 in 2010 would be worth $1B today.

But here's what most people don't understand.

The ones who made billions with BTC by investing $100 were:

1) Either already very rich, so $100M-$200M didn't matter too much

2) Or, lost their keys and then found them after 15 years.

And there's one more case.

They went to jail and then came out after 10-12 years, so they HODLed it forcefully.

[Leo.hl @leo_build_hl]

If you’re not tracking the $veHYBR math, you’re missing out

Last epoch we printed $22.53K in fees + $8.39K in rebases—all on a $920K voter mcap.

that’s ~3.3% weekly ROI. With the upcoming shift sending 100% of fees to voters, the flywheel is just getting started

NFA, but I’m stacking bags

[obese.potato🥔 @Obesepotato_]

2 months ago, I posted my Pacifica referral

Someone used my referral and did 3m volume

And I got $200 + 1100 points ( $0.5 per point?) in fees dam

crazyy lol, whoever used it thanks g🤝

[x256.hl @x256xx]

SEND THIS SHIT

[Leo.hl @leo_build_hl]

DeFi complexity is the enemy of adoption, @HywardFi is here to simplify the game on MetaDexs.

We’ve built an autonomous engine that stacks $BTC and $HYPE for you on autopilot. No manual voting, no chores—just pure, automated compounding.

Imagine setting this in motion today, living your life, and coming back in 2036 to harvest a decade of accumulated wealth.