@markoah For us to be united we have to deny English ethnicity? This is nonsense, this island has had multiple ethnicities living together (mostly) happily for centuries, the Welsh, the Scotts, the English.
@michael0c@ItsTaz1989 Sure, but lines are drawn, things have beginnings, distinctions that are made, time is a factor. Otherwise we just conclude - there's no such thing as ethnicity bc if you go back far enough we're all just Africans.
@michael0c@ItsTaz1989 In that example it's much clearer that someone might be Colombian without being mestiza, but living in Colombia, being born there, isn't going to make them Mestiza.
@michael0c@ItsTaz1989 For example. My gf is Colombian. Colombian isn't an ethnicity. Her ethnicity is mestiza (mix of Indigenous American and European).
@michael0c@ItsTaz1989 I think a big part of the issue around this is that England the nation doesn't have a separate word that isn't an ethnicity that confers membership. It just has 'English', which also happens to be an ethnicity.
@KarlPritch86 They either deny it exists, or they think that all it takes to become of that ethnicity is being born in England, sometimes they seem to require an amount of time spent here too or certain sports. (Grew up in England, plays cricket etc.)
@SamCKx It's not because of the colour of his skin, it's because of his ethnicity. I'd say the same thing to a white Russian.
Is your argument that English isn't an ethnicity, or that it is an ethnicity, but ancestry is not required to be of that ethnicity?