Banning CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House because the president hates the coverage is not “accountability.”
It’s the state picking who counts as press.
You don’t have to call it Beijing for it to be a First Amendment problem. You only have to notice who holds the keys.
Try knowing what you are talking about before insulting. Cleaning up 400 inactive, expired security badges for people who weren't even showing up to work isn't a press ban it's basic office administration. Not a single outlet was blocked from coverage.
Unilaterally revoking credentials for active news outlets because a politician can't handle tough reporting is targeted censorship.
Try reading past the headline next time before slapping "Facts" on complete fiction.
Their First Amendment rights are intact, they just got kicked out of the room is a wild redefinition of free press protections.
The First Amendment exists specifically to stop politicians from acting as judge, jury, and executioner over who counts as "truthful."
The moment you let the government declare critical journalists "liars" and revoke their physical access to audit power, you don't have a free press—you have state-approved press access. Giving the government a remote control over who gets to sit in the room sets a precedent that every future President will use against your favorite news sources.
Claims of "illegal activities" or a "sham election" in Maricopa County have been thoroughly debunked by multiple audits, courts, and independent investigations including the state Senate's own hand recount.
The partisan review conducted by Cyber Ninjas actually re-confirmed that the certified ballot count was accurate. Furthermore, election officials conducted full forensic audits of the voting equipment, and dozens of legal challenges brought before state and federal judges were dismissed for lack of evidence.
Certifying an election after verifying the results through legal protocols isn't an "admission of a sham" it is fulfilling a mandatory constitutional duty. If there were actual evidence of illegal activity, it would be presented in a court of law under oath, not teased on social media.
Calling nearly 2 billion people "tools of Satan" isn't a holy mission it's basic prejudice masked as piety.
The vast majority of Muslims live normal, peaceful lives, raising families and serving their communities. Reducing an entire global faith to a cartoonish villain story is just weaponized fearmongering.
If your worldview requires you to hate two billion neighbors to feel righteous, the problem isn't their religion it's your bigotry.
They weren’t secretly drenching your kale in farm pesticides.
ProduceMaxx is an EPA-registered antimicrobial dilute hypochlorous acid (a chlorine compound) used in grocery misting systems to kill E. coli, Salmonella, and Listeria and keep produce from rotting. Same class of sanitizer used throughout the produce supply chain. Not Roundup. Not a field insecticide.
When Washington politicians talk about economic growth, @SherrodBrown talks about the people who actually build it.
For decades, Sherrod’s "Dignity of Work" mindset hasn't been a campaign catchphrase it’s been an action plan for Ohio. He brought historic chip manufacturing back to Central Ohio through the CHIPS Act, passed the Butch Lewis Act to restore hard-earned pensions for over 100,000 Ohio workers, and stood shoulder-to-shoulder with East Palestine to demand real freight rail safety standards.
Whether it’s fighting for veterans under the PACT Act or keeping Ohio steel on American job sites through Buy America provisions, Sherrod Brown always puts the Ohio worker first. That’s why he’s earned our vote.
Quoting "nonpublic forum" rules backfires completely.
A "nonpublic forum" means the government can set reasonable boundaries on time and safety it does NOT mean the government gets to censor opposition.
The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that viewpoint discrimination is illegal in every forum public, limited, or nonpublic. If the executive branch lets friendly outlets into a press brief but bars critical ones, that isn't "managing a restricted space" it is state-mandated political censorship masquerading as administration.
The DOJ is about to prove it isn't evidence it's a promise to produce evidence later because none exists right now.
We have dozens of state-level audits, strict federal citizenship laws, and comprehensive data reviews. Every single deep-dive investigation finds the exact same thing: non-citizens voting is extraordinarily rare because nobody is risking a felony conviction, prison time, and immediate deportation just to cast one illegal ballot.
If you're confident in this claim: Show us the data. What is the official count of non-citizens who actually voted in the last election? Give us the case numbers, the state audit reports, or the DOJ court docs.
Hey, curious, doesn't this description completely misrepresents basic immunology and tissue biology.
First, I didn't think muscle injections were designed to stay isolated like a sealed box they interact directly with your lymphatic system. I also thought the vast majority of lipid nanoparticles stayed at the injection site or drained into local lymph nodes, where dendritic cells and macrophages pick them up to generate antibodies.
Second, I didn't know immune cells went on a "random cell execution spree." Antigen-presenting cells express the protein locally to train T-cells and B-cells. Don't trace amounts that reach circulation get rapidly cleared by the liver, not randomly fusing with brain or cardiac tissue?
Absolutely @funder ! Calling 760,000 Americans "frauds" to justify stripping their healthcare is an outrage.
When the government wants to cut costs, it doesn't go after corporate price-gouging by private insurance execs it removes hundreds of thousands of working families from public exchanges.
In a country where healthcare is already overwhelmingly expensive, using "fraud" as a blanket excuse to throw families off coverage is pure political cruelty. November is the time to vote out anyone who views healthcare as a privilege to be revoked rather than a basic right.
The New York Post is a tabloid in both format and style: compact pages, screaming headlines, Page Six gossip, and a consistent conservative editorial slant under News Corp. You may as well get your news from the National Enquirer. But, even The New York Post is protected by the US constitution.
Resorting to primary-school name-calling ("weird," "dangerous," "socialist") is what happens when you can't defend your record on healthcare, jobs, or wages.
Labeling doctors who treat public health crises and loggers who fight corporate monopolies as "people who want a different country" is classic fearmongering. Voters aren't rejecting opposition because it's "weird." They're rejecting politicians who pretend that standing up for working people, union jobs, and healthcare access is somehow un-American.